모든 템플릿

Nonprofit Donor Experience & Giving Motivation Survey

Measures why donors give, what shapes their satisfaction with the giving experience, and how likely they are to give again — covering motivations, program allocation preferences, and price sensitivity for asks. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the real story behind each donor's likelihood-to-give-again score.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for supporting our work! We'd love to understand your experience as a donor so we can serve you and our mission better. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 8 minutes, and your honest answers help the most.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, how many times have you donated to us?

  • Never (first-time prospective donor)
  • Once
  • 2-3 times
  • 4-6 times
  • More than 6 times
Q03
객관식필수

Which best describes how you usually give?

  • One-time gift
  • Recurring monthly gift
  • Workplace giving or payroll deduction
  • Gift in honor or memory of someone
  • Event-based giving (e.g., gala, fun run)
  • Other
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

For each set, tell us which factor matters most and which matters least in your decision to donate.

  • Alignment with a cause I personally care about
  • Tax deduction benefits
  • Personal connection to someone affected
  • Recommendation from a friend or family member
  • Confidence that funds are used effectively
  • Recognition or acknowledgment for giving
  • A matching gift or challenge campaign
  • An emotionally compelling story or appeal
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most in my decision to donate최악:Matters least in my decision to donate
Q05
매트릭스필수

How satisfied are you with each part of your donation experience?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Ease of making a donation online or by phone
  • Clarity of how your donation is being used
  • Frequency of updates from the organization
  • Personalization of thank-you and acknowledgment
  • Trustworthiness of impact reporting
: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to donate to us again in the next 12 months?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
가격 민감도(Van Westendorp)

Thinking about a one-time gift to us, please answer honestly for each amount question below.

  • At what one-time donation amount would you feel it's too small to make a meaningful difference?
  • At what one-time donation amount would you feel you're getting great impact for your money (a real bargain)?
  • At what one-time donation amount would it start to feel like a stretch for your budget, though still worth giving?
  • At what one-time donation amount would you feel it's too much for you to consider giving right now?
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-give-again score: what specific experience, interaction, or piece of communication shaped that number, and whether it ties back to how funds were used, how they were communicated with, or personal circumstances. If they gave a low score (0-6), probe what would need to change for them to consider giving again; if their giving history suggests they've lapsed or only given once, ask what caused that and what would re-engage them.

Q09
점수 배분

If you were making a $100 gift to us today, how would you split it across these program areas? (Template note: replace the placeholder program areas with your organization's real programs before launching.)

  • (Replace with Program Area A, e.g., Direct Services)
  • (Replace with Program Area B, e.g., Research)
  • (Replace with Program Area C, e.g., Advocacy)
  • (Replace with Program Area D, e.g., Community Outreach)
  • General operating support
100점 배분
Q10
객관식

Which method do you prefer for hearing about how your donations are used?

  • Email
  • Physical mail
  • Phone call
  • Text message
  • Social media
  • No further contact needed
  • Other
Q11
단문형

What's one thing we could change to improve your donation experience?

Q12
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which range best reflects your household income?

  • Under $50,000
  • $50,000-$99,999
  • $100,000-$149,999
  • $150,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your generosity and your time! Your answers go directly into how we shape our donor communications, giving options, and program priorities.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs standard quantitative measures (max-diff on giving motivations, a satisfaction matrix, constant-sum budget allocation across programs, and Van Westendorp pricing for asks) with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the actual reasoning behind each donor's likelihood-to-give-again score.
  • Covers the full donor journey in one flow — giving frequency and preferred giving method, satisfaction across specific touchpoints, program allocation preferences, and reporting/communication preferences — rather than isolated questions.
  • Goes beyond a single open-ended box: the adaptive AI interview probes each respondent individually on their score, so low scores and high scores get different, personalized follow-up questions instead of one generic 'why' field.
  • Ends with an automated report generation step, so nonprofit teams get synthesized donor-motivation insights without manually coding open-text responses.

QuestionPro

Nonprofit Donor Feedback Survey Questions + Sample Survey Template

A genuinely comparable, fielding-ready donor feedback survey template with sample questions on giving experience and satisfaction. It's built on QuestionPro's standard survey engine, so it's strong on distribution and reporting basics but static in question flow. Good like-for-like comparison for a nonprofit donor survey use case.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built donor feedback template with sample questions ready to adapt
  • Backed by a full survey platform with standard analytics and reporting
  • Established template library covering common nonprofit research needs

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual donor reasoning in real time
  • No voice AI interview option or screen-share guided tasks for richer qualitative context
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology behind any analysis or scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.