QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Pay Increase Fairness and Impact Survey

Captures how employees actually experienced their most recent pay increase — whether it felt fair, how it compares to expectations, and what should drive future raises — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind fairness and retention ratings. Built for HR and compensation teams evaluating a recent pay cycle.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your honest perspective on your most recent pay increase. This helps us make future pay decisions fairer and clearer. It should take about 5 minutes, and your individual answers are kept confidential.

Q02
객관식필수

Did you receive a pay increase in the most recent review cycle?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Not sure / can't recall
Q03
의견 척도필수

Thinking about your role, performance, and market pay for similar positions, how fair do you feel your most recent pay increase (or lack of one) was?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q04
평점 척도필수

How satisfied are you with the size of your most recent pay increase?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not satisfied at all최대:Extremely satisfied
Q05
매트릭스

How much do you agree with each of the following statements about how your pay increase was handled?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • I understood how the increase amount was decided
  • My manager explained the reasoning behind the decision
  • I received the news with enough advance notice
  • The process felt consistent with how others were treated
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
객관식필수

How did your most recent pay increase compare to what you were expecting?

  • Much less than expected
  • Somewhat less than expected
  • About what I expected
  • Somewhat more than expected
  • Much more than expected
Q07
점수 배분필수

If you had to allocate 100 points across the factors that SHOULD matter most when deciding pay increases, how would you split them?

  • Individual performance
  • Time in role / tenure
  • External market benchmarks
  • Scope of responsibilities
  • Internal pay equity across the team
  • Company financial performance
100점 배분
Q08
의견 척도필수

Given your current pay trajectory, how likely are you to still be working here in 12 months?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Very unlikely to stay최대:Very likely to stay
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the reasoning behind the respondent's fairness rating and retention likelihood. If they rated fairness low, probe specifically what would have made it feel fair — the amount, the explanation, the timing, or comparison to peers. If they rated retention likelihood low, ask whether pay is the main driver or one of several factors, and what change (if any) would shift their answer. If they said they didn't receive an increase, ask what they were told about why and how that landed.

Q10
객관식

Did you have a direct conversation with your manager about your pay increase decision?

  • Yes, a detailed discussion
  • Yes, but only briefly
  • No conversation happened
  • Not applicable
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your department or function?

  • Engineering / Technical
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Operations
  • Customer Support
  • Finance / Legal
  • HR / People
  • Other
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-2 years
  • 3-5 years
  • 6-10 years
  • More than 10 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for your candor. Your responses will be combined with others to help leadership review how pay increase decisions are made and communicated going forward.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a satisfaction score with a constant-sum allocation exercise that forces employees to weigh what SHOULD drive future raises (performance, market rate, tenure, etc.)
  • Pairs a fairness/retention opinion scale with an AI follow-up interview that actively digs into the reasoning behind those ratings, rather than leaving low scores unexplained
  • Includes a matrix on pay process agreement plus a direct question on whether a manager conversation happened, giving HR both the outcome and the process context
  • Automatically compiles responses into a report, so compensation teams get synthesized themes on fairness and retention risk instead of raw spreadsheet exports

Jotform

Pay Increase Form Template

This is a static, drag-and-drop form template aimed at documenting or requesting a pay increase rather than surveying employee sentiment about one. It's fielding-ready in Jotform's builder but structurally a request/approval form, not an attitudinal research instrument. Useful for HR admin workflows, less so for understanding perceived fairness.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder
  • Easy to embed in existing HR approval workflows
  • Free to start using like other Jotform templates

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — all fields are fixed at design time
  • No mechanism to probe the reasoning behind a fairness or retention rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or synthesized report generation

SurveySparrow

Pay Increase Form Template | Streamline Employee Raises

SurveySparrow's version leans on its conversational, chat-style form format, which makes it feel more engaging than a plain form. It's still a fixed-question template geared at streamlining the raise process, not specifically at unpacking fairness perceptions or retention risk. Fielding-ready, but the depth stops where the pre-written questions end.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion rates
  • Template is positioned specifically around employee raises, not generic forms
  • Likely supports basic branching logic typical of SurveySparrow forms

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up that adapts based on a respondent's fairness rating
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were designed
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses

Typeform

Pay Increase Form Template

Typeform offers its signature clean, conversational form experience for this template, which is pleasant to fill out but fixed once published. It's a ready-to-field static template rather than an interview instrument, so it can capture what employees select but not why they selected it. No indication of voice interaction or task-based components.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, distraction-free one-question-per-screen design
  • Simple to publish and share via link or embed
  • Familiar builder for teams already using Typeform elsewhere

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI probing into fairness or retention reasoning
  • No voice interview option or guided task/screen-share capability
  • No automated report synthesis — results are raw response data for manual analysis

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기