모든 템플릿

Stakeholder Satisfaction & Relationship Health Survey

Measures how satisfied external and internal stakeholders (board members, funders, suppliers, community partners) are with your organization's communication, transparency, and responsiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision behind their rating instead of settling for a generic score.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your perspective as one of our stakeholders. Your honest feedback shapes how we work with partners like you going forward. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your relationship to (Replace with organization name)? (Template note: replace with your own stakeholder categories before launching.)

  • Board member or governance role
  • Investor or funder
  • Supplier or vendor
  • Community or advocacy partner
  • Employee representative / union rep
  • Regulatory or government contact
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how satisfied are you with your relationship with (Replace with organization name) over the last 12 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
매트릭스필수

How satisfied are you with each of the following aspects of the relationship?

7개 행 × 5개 열
  • Clarity and frequency of communication
  • Responsiveness to your concerns or requests
  • Transparency in decision-making
  • Value or benefit you receive from the relationship
  • Alignment with your organization's interests and goals
  • 외 2개
: Very dissatisfied · Dissatisfied · Neutral · Satisfied · Very satisfied
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

When you think about what matters most in this relationship, which of these matter most and least to you?

  • Clear, timely communication
  • Financial or operational transparency
  • Responsiveness to feedback or issues
  • Alignment with your organization's goals
  • Opportunities for real input in decisions
  • Consistency of updates over time
  • Fair treatment relative to other stakeholders
  • Long-term strategic vision
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q06
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to continue or renew this relationship over the next 12 months?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
점수 배분

If (Replace with organization name) could only improve in a few areas this year, how would you distribute 100 points across these to reflect where investment matters most to you?

  • Communication frequency and clarity
  • Decision-making transparency
  • Financial or performance reporting
  • Speed of response to issues
  • Recognition of your contributions
100점 배분
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall satisfaction rating and their lowest-rated item in the aspect ratings above. Ask for a specific recent example or interaction that shaped their view, what a better version of that interaction would have looked like, and if their renewal likelihood was low, what single change would most increase it. If they rate everything positively with no specifics, gently push for one thing that could still be improved.

Q09
장문형

Is there anything else about your experience as a stakeholder you'd like us to know?

Q10
객관식

How long have you been a stakeholder in this relationship?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-7 years
  • More than 7 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

What is the size of the organization you represent, if applicable?

  • Individual / not affiliated
  • Small (under 50 people)
  • Medium (50-500 people)
  • Large (500+ people)
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for your candor. Your responses will be reviewed by our leadership team and used to strengthen how we communicate and work with stakeholders like you.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning and specific moment or decision behind a stakeholder's rating
  • Segments respondents by relationship type, tenure, and organization size so results can be broken out by board members, funders, suppliers, or community partners
  • Uses a matrix and max-diff to identify which specific aspects of the relationship (communication, transparency, responsiveness) matter most and where satisfaction lags
  • Includes a constant-sum question forcing stakeholders to prioritize a limited set of improvement areas, plus an open-ended long-text question and closing chat messages that set expectations for leadership review

SurveySparrow

Stakeholder Satisfaction Survey Template | Measure Stakeholder Engagement

This is a directly comparable, fielding-ready stakeholder satisfaction template covering similar relationship and engagement themes. It appears to rely on standard static question types rather than adaptive follow-up interviews. As with most template-library entries, the page doesn't disclose scoring methodology or how responses are analyzed beyond basic reporting.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built specifically for stakeholder satisfaction/engagement, so questions are pre-aligned to that use case
  • Part of a broader survey platform with omnichannel distribution options
  • Likely offers quick customization and deployment for common stakeholder-survey scenarios

아쉬운 점

  • No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning to dig into the reasoning behind a rating — appears to be a fixed question set
  • No evidence of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent, published prompts
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks mentioned

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.