QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Student Perception of Course Quality Survey

Captures how students genuinely experience a course or program — clarity of teaching, fairness, workload, and engagement — paired with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment behind their overall rating. Built for instructors, program leads, and academic affairs teams who want more than end-of-term star ratings.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Hi! We'd like your honest take on this course so we can make it better for future students. This should take about 5 minutes, and your responses will be kept anonymous from your instructor's grading decisions.

Q02
객관식필수

Which course or class are you evaluating? (Replace with your actual course list before launching.)

  • (Course A)
  • (Course B)
  • (Course C)
  • (Course D)
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate the quality of this course?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this course?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The instructor explained concepts clearly
  • Course materials were well organized
  • Feedback on assignments was timely and useful
  • I felt comfortable asking questions or sharing ideas
  • Grading and assessment felt fair
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
객관식필수

In the last month, how often did you attend office hours, ask questions in class, or reach out to the instructor?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more
Q06
평점 척도

How would you rate the pacing and workload of this course relative to what you expected?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Much too heavy최대:Just right
Q07
순위 매기기필수

Rank these factors by how much they shape your overall impression of a course.

  1. Teaching clarity
  2. Workload and pacing
  3. Relevance to real skills or interests
  4. Interaction with peers
  5. Fairness of grading
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific experience behind the respondent's overall rating and recommendation score: ask for a concrete moment or assignment that shaped their view, whether it was a strength or a letdown, and why. If they flagged low agreement on clarity, feedback timing, or fairness in the earlier ratings, probe that statement directly with a real example. If their rating and recommendation scores diverge noticeably, ask what's driving the gap.

Q10
장문형

If you could change one thing about this course, what would it be?

Q11
객관식

What year or stage are you at in your studies? (Optional)

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year or beyond
  • Graduate student
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What is your general field of study? (Optional — replace with your institution's departments before launching.)

  • (Field A)
  • (Field B)
  • (Field C)
  • (Field D)
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thanks so much for sharing your perspective! Your answers will be combined with other students' responses to help improve teaching and course design — individual responses are not shared with instructors for grading purposes.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Pairs quantitative measures — an overall course quality rating, a workload/pacing rating, a matrix of agreement statements, and a likelihood-to-recommend score — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment behind each student's overall rating, not just the number itself
  • Includes a behavioral frequency question on office hours/question-asking and a ranking exercise so you learn which factors actually drive impressions, rather than guessing from a single star rating
  • A dedicated open-text question ('what one thing would you change') captures concrete, actionable feedback that static scales miss
  • Optional year-of-study and field-of-study questions let academic affairs teams segment results without forcing every respondent to answer

Jotform

Student Perception Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field static form covering standard student-perception items, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize and embed but relies entirely on fixed question sets with no adaptive probing. Good for quick deployment, less suited to teams wanting deeper qualitative insight per response.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template that can be deployed quickly
  • Drag-and-drop customization and broad integration ecosystem typical of Jotform
  • Familiar, simple form format for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind a rating
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task options
  • No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted

Typeform

Student Perception Survey Template

Typeform's version emphasizes its signature one-question-at-a-time conversational interface, which tends to boost completion rates for course-feedback surveys. It's a fixed template rather than an adaptive interview, so every respondent sees the same fixed sequence of questions. Strong on form aesthetics and UX, thinner on follow-up depth.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface known to improve completion rates
  • Simple to customize and share as a standalone link
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up questions — the flow is identical for every respondent regardless of their answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated reports
  • No voice interview or guided task with screen share option

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기