QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Workplace Communication Style Assessment

Maps how employees prefer to send and receive information at work — channel choices, clarity gaps, and communication traits that matter most to them — with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs a real recent miscommunication instead of relying on abstract self-ratings.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on how you communicate at work. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right answers here — we're mapping real patterns, not testing you. About 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which channel do you rely on most for day-to-day work communication?

  • Chat/messaging app (e.g. Slack, Teams)
  • Email
  • Video call
  • In-person conversation
  • Phone call
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about your own communication style?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • I prefer writing things down over discussing them verbally
  • I say what I mean directly rather than hinting at it
  • I need time to think before responding to a tough question
  • I notice tone and body language more than the words themselves
  • I'd rather over-communicate than risk being misunderstood
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
순위 매기기필수

Rank these in order of what matters most to you when someone communicates with you at work (most important first).

  1. Clarity
  2. Speed of response
  3. Tone and warmth
  4. Level of detail
  5. Honesty, even if blunt
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
의견 척도필수

In the last 30 days, how clearly has your manager or team communicated what's expected of you?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q06
슬라이더 매트릭스

How effective is each channel for getting your point across at work?

5개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • Email
  • Chat/messaging app
  • Video call
  • In-person conversation
  • Phone call
슬라이더 0–10최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q07
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did a message you sent or received get misunderstood in a way that caused friction or extra work?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more
Q08
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which communication traits matter most and least to you in a colleague?

  • Clarity
  • Brevity
  • Empathy
  • Responsiveness
  • Transparency
  • Consistent tone
  • Structure and organization
  • Follows through on what they say
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk you through the most recent time a work message was misunderstood — what was said, through which channel, what they thought it meant, and what actually happened. Probe whether the breakdown was about channel choice, tone, timing, or missing context, and what would have prevented it. If they said misunderstandings never happen, probe instead for a moment they had to over-explain something to be understood.

Q10
객관식

When someone gives you feedback, which style helps you actually hear it?

  • Direct and to the point, even if blunt
  • Softened with context and reassurance
  • Written first, discussed after
  • In-the-moment conversation, not written
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role type?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Executive/leadership
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with your current team?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the honest reflection. Your responses feed into a team-level view of communication patterns and gaps, used to shape training and channel guidelines, never to evaluate you individually.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond self-rated scales with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to reconstruct their most recent real work miscommunication, not a hypothetical one
  • Combines structured measurement (channel preference, agreement matrix, ranking, max-diff on traits, slider matrix on channel effectiveness) with open-ended probing in a single flow
  • Captures both frequency (how often messages get misunderstood, how clear manager expectations have been in the last 30 days) and root-cause detail via the interview
  • Segments results by role type and tenure so communication-style patterns can be compared across teams, with results feeding into an auto-generated report

Jotform

Communication Style Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use, drag-and-drop form template built on Jotform's general form builder. It's fielding-ready but consists of fixed questions with no adaptive logic or interview component. Best suited to teams that just want a quick, customizable static form.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Quick to deploy as a standalone fielding-ready form
  • Broad integration options typical of Jotform's ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
  • No mechanism to reconstruct a specific real incident — relies on generic self-ratings
  • No published methodology or per-response quality scoring

QuestionPro

Communication Style Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

Presented as a sample questionnaire plus supporting guidance rather than a single polished fielding-ready survey — more of a question bank with commentary. Useful as a starting reference for researchers building their own instrument, backed by QuestionPro's broader survey platform.

잘하는 점

  • Question bank framed with research-style guidance on what to ask and why
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey logic and reporting features
  • Sample questionnaire can be adapted across multiple use cases

아쉬운 점

  • Reads as a guide/sample question list rather than a turnkey fielding-ready template
  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into a specific recent miscommunication
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

Typeform

Communication Style Survey Form

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time form styled for a pleasant respondent experience. It's fielding-ready and visually polished, but the flow is still a fixed sequence of questions rather than a dynamic interview that adapts to what the respondent says.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Fielding-ready template with Typeform's typical design quality
  • Good respondent completion experience for shorter surveys

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI-driven follow-up questioning — logic branches are pre-set, not generated from responses
  • No voice interview option or guided screen-share task capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure

SurveySparrow

Communication Skills Assessment Questionnaire Template

A chat-style, conversational employee assessment template that's fielding-ready and framed for HR/workplace use. It emphasizes assessing skills through a fixed set of scored questions rather than reconstructing an actual recent communication incident.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-like survey format aimed at employee engagement
  • Fielding-ready and framed specifically for workplace communication skills
  • Consistent with SurveySparrow's broader employee-experience template library

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview capable of reconstructing a specific recent miscommunication event
  • No voice AI interview or guided task/screen-share option
  • No disclosed methodology for scoring or automated per-response quality assessment

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기