모든 템플릿

Physical Therapy Progress & Experience Evaluation

Tracks a patient's pain, functional ability, home exercise adherence, and satisfaction with their physical therapy plan of care, with an AI follow-up that digs into what's really getting in the way of progress. Built for outpatient PT clinics running periodic check-ins or discharge reviews.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to check in on your physical therapy. Your answers help your care team adjust your plan and help us improve. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This takes about 4-5 minutes and there are no wrong answers.

Q02
객관식필수

What body area or condition are you currently receiving physical therapy for?

  • Low back
  • Neck or upper back
  • Shoulder
  • Knee
  • Hip
  • Ankle or foot
  • Wrist or hand
  • Post-surgical recovery
  • Balance or fall prevention
Q03
의견 척도필수

Right now, how would you rate your pain?

척도: 010
최소:No pain최대:Worst pain imaginable
Q04
매트릭스필수

In the last 7 days, how much difficulty have you had with each of the following?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Walking short distances
  • Climbing stairs
  • Getting up from a chair or bed
  • Reaching overhead
  • Lifting or carrying objects
  • 외 1개
: No difficulty · Slight difficulty · Moderate difficulty · Severe difficulty · Unable to do
Q05
의견 척도필수

How much progress do you feel you've made toward the personal goals you set with your therapist?

척도: 17
최소:No progress at all최대:Fully achieved my goals
Q06
객관식필수

In the past 7 days, on how many days did you complete your prescribed home exercises?

  • 0 days
  • 1-2 days
  • 3-4 days
  • 5-6 days
  • 7 days (every day)
Q07
객관식

What has made it hardest to keep up with your home exercises? Select all that apply.

  • Exercises caused too much pain
  • Not enough time
  • Forgot to do them
  • Instructions weren't clear
  • Not sure they're helping
  • Lack of motivation
Q08
평점 척도필수

How clearly has your therapist explained your condition and how to do your exercises correctly?

범위: 15
최소:Not clear at all최대:Extremely clear
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Explore the gap between the patient's reported pain/functional difficulty and their sense of progress toward goals. If they reported low home-exercise adherence or specific barriers, probe concretely which exercises they skip, why, and whether pain during exercise is a factor versus time or motivation. If they report high adherence but low progress, probe whether the exercises feel matched to their goals or need to be adjusted. Anchor on specific recent sessions rather than general impressions.

Q10
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this physical therapy clinic to a friend or family member?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q11
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 18
  • 18-29
  • 30-44
  • 45-59
  • 60-74
  • 75 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for sharing this update. Your responses go directly to your care team to help fine-tune your treatment plan and are also used, in aggregate, to improve how we support patients like you.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static pain/function ratings with an AI follow-up interview specifically designed to dig into what's really blocking progress, not just capture a score
  • Combines a pain rating, a matrix of functional difficulty items, home exercise adherence tracking, and reasons for non-adherence in one flow rather than a single generic evaluation form
  • Includes clinician-relevant clarity questions (how well the therapist explained the condition and exercises) alongside outcome and satisfaction/recommendation measures
  • Opens and closes with clear chat messages framing the check-in and confirming responses go to the patient's care team, which builds trust and context missing from plain form fields

Jotform

Physical Therapy Evaluation Form Template

A standard fillable form template for capturing physical therapy evaluation details, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's fielding-ready out of the box and easy to customize with their editor, but it's a static field-based form rather than a conversational or adaptive survey. No mechanism to probe deeper into a patient's specific barriers to progress.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately
  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's ecosystem
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form/e-signature/workflow tools

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to explore why a patient's pain or function isn't improving
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • No voice AI interview option for patients who prefer speaking over typing

SurveySparrow

Physical Therapy Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style survey template aimed at healthcare use cases, which fits the same audience as this template. It offers a more engaging one-question-at-a-time format than a plain form, but its 'conversational' feel is templated and scripted rather than a true adaptive interview that reacts to what the patient says.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, one-at-a-time UI likely improves completion rates versus a dense form
  • Positioned specifically for healthcare templates, suggesting relevant field types
  • Fielding-ready template for quick deployment

아쉬운 점

  • No genuine adaptive AI questioning — flow is pre-scripted rather than dynamically probing individual answers
  • No per-response automated quality scoring reported
  • No published methodology for how follow-up questions (if any) are generated

Typeform

Physical Therapy Evaluation Form Template

Typeform's well-known conversational form format applied to a physical therapy evaluation, offering a polished, mobile-friendly respondent experience. It's a strong fielding-ready template, but like other form builders it lacks true adaptive branching driven by an AI reading and reacting to open-ended answers in real time.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, mobile-friendly conversational interface
  • Fielding-ready template within a widely used survey platform
  • Logic-based branching for basic conditional flows

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview that adapts based on the substance of a patient's answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.