모든 템플릿

Weekly Workload & Support Pulse Survey

A recurring pulse instrument measuring employee workload manageability, pace sustainability, support quality, and improvement priorities. Designed for weekly fielding to track burnout risk and inform resourcing decisions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 15개 · 약 8분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this week's pulse check. This brief survey asks about your workload and support over the last 7 days. It should take about 8 minutes to complete. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate — no individual answers will be shared with your manager. Participation is voluntary, and there are no right or wrong answers. Your honest feedback helps us improve how we support our teams.

Q02
의견 척도

Overall, how manageable did your workload feel over the last 7 days?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all manageable최대:Completely manageable
Q03
의견 척도

How supported did you feel by your direct manager over the last 7 days?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all supported최대:Very well supported
Q04
순위 매기기

For next week, rank the improvements that would help you most (top = most helpful).

  1. Clearer priorities
  2. Fewer meetings
  3. Dedicated focus-time blocks
  4. More reliable tooling
  5. Faster cross-team decisions
  6. Temporary workload coverage
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
장문형

Based on your responses, is there anything else you'd like to share about your workload or support experience this week?

Q06
드롭다운

Which department or function do you primarily work in?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design
  • Data/Analytics
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support
  • Operations
  • People/HR
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지

Thank you for completing this week's pulse check. Your feedback is reviewed in aggregate and directly informs how we plan resourcing and support. See you next week!

Q08
의견 척도

How sustainable did the pace of your work feel over the last 7 days?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all sustainable최대:Completely sustainable
Q09
의견 척도

How supported did you feel by your team or peers over the last 7 days?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all supported최대:Very well supported
Q10
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand more about your experience this week. An AI interviewer will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q11
객관식

What is your current work arrangement?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Fully remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
드롭다운

How many of the last 7 days did you work beyond your usual hours?

  • 0 days
  • 1 day
  • 2 days
  • 3 days
  • 4 days
  • 5 days
  • 6 days
  • 7 days
Q13
드롭다운

How long have you been at the company?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3 to 12 months
  • 1 to 3 years
  • 3 to 5 years
  • 5+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
객관식

What made your workload harder to manage in the last 7 days? Select all that apply.

  • Unclear or shifting priorities
  • Too many meetings or interruptions
  • Staffing constraints or handoffs
  • Urgent or last-minute requests
  • Cross-team dependencies
  • Tooling or environment issues
  • Process friction (e.g., reviews, approvals)
  • Nothing in particular
Q15
객관식

What region do you primarily work in?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes two dedicated opinion-scale questions tracking workload manageability and pace sustainability week over week, not just a single generic satisfaction score
  • Pairs manager-support and peer-support ratings with a ranking question so respondents prioritize which improvements would help most next week
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe the reasons behind low scores in the respondent's own words, with transparent prompts and an automated report, rather than leaving that context to a single open-text box
  • Captures workload-hardship drivers via a multi-select question and contextual fields (department, work arrangement, tenure, region) so resourcing decisions can be segmented

QuestionPro

Employee pulse sample questionnaire and survey template

A sample pulse questionnaire covering general employee sentiment topics, presented as a static template to copy into their survey builder. It's a reasonable starting point for recurring engagement pulses but isn't purpose-built around weekly workload/pace/support tracking or burnout-risk resourcing decisions.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with broad question-type library and reporting dashboards
  • Template is framed specifically around recurring employee pulse checks
  • Likely supports basic branching logic for segmentation

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing or voice AI follow-up to probe low scores in respondents' own words
  • Static question set with no automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published transparent-prompt methodology for how open-text responses are interpreted

SurveyMonkey

Pulse Survey Template

A general-purpose employee pulse template from a widely used survey tool, useful for quick sentiment checks but not tailored to the specific workload/pace/support/priority structure of a burnout-tracking pulse. It's a fielding-ready form rather than an adaptive interview instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Recognizable, easy-to-deploy survey builder with strong distribution and analytics features
  • Template covers general pulse/engagement question areas
  • Likely offers benchmarking against SurveyMonkey's own norms

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed-question format with no adaptive AI or voice follow-up probing
  • No automated response-quality scoring per submission
  • No ranking-based prioritization of improvement actions built into the template

SurveySparrow

Weekly Team Update Template | To collect weekly status updates

Designed for collecting weekly status updates (progress, blockers, plans) rather than measuring workload manageability, pace sustainability, or burnout risk, so it addresses a different use case with only surface-level overlap in cadence. It is a static, fielding-ready form rather than a workload/support diagnostic.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational chat-style survey format that may feel quick to fill out weekly
  • Purpose-built for a recurring weekly cadence
  • Simple structure suited to status reporting rather than deep diagnostics

아쉬운 점

  • Not designed to measure workload/pace/support constructs or rank improvement priorities
  • No adaptive AI or voice interviewing to explore reasons behind status changes
  • No automated quality scoring or burnout-risk-oriented reporting

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.