모든 템플릿

Student Gentrification and Neighborhood Change Survey

Captures how residents, students, and local business owners experience neighborhood change linked to growing student populations — rents, displacement, local business shifts, and town-gown relations — with an AI follow-up that digs into specific, lived examples behind the numbers instead of vague impressions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience of how student population growth has affected your neighborhood. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right answers — we want your honest view. This should take about 5-6 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your relationship to this neighborhood?

  • Long-term resident (10+ years)
  • Newer resident (under 10 years)
  • Local business owner or employee
  • Current student
  • Landlord or property owner
  • Other
Q03
숫자

How many years have you lived, worked, or studied in this neighborhood?

Q04
의견 척도필수

How much has this neighborhood changed because of a growing student population?

척도: 010
최소:No noticeable change최대:Completely transformed
Q05
매트릭스필수

Thinking about the growth of the student population here, how has it affected each of the following?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Housing affordability
  • Availability of long-term rental housing
  • Mix of local shops and restaurants
  • Noise and late-night activity
  • Sense of community or neighborliness
  • 외 1개
: Very negative · Somewhat negative · No real impact · Somewhat positive · Very positive
Q06
객관식필수

In the last 3 years, how has your own housing cost (rent or mortgage-related expenses) changed?

  • Decreased
  • Stayed about the same
  • Increased slightly
  • Increased significantly
  • Not applicable / prefer not to say
Q07
순위 매기기필수

Rank these concerns about student-driven neighborhood change from most to least pressing for you.

  1. Rising rents or home prices
  2. Displacement of long-term residents
  3. Loss of neighborhood character
  4. Increased noise or parties
  5. Parking and traffic congestion
  6. Decline of family-oriented businesses
  7. Overcrowded shared housing
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
객관식필수

Over the past year, has the balance between long-term residents and students in your area shifted?

  • More students than before
  • More long-term residents than before
  • About the same
  • Not sure
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Probe the 'why' behind the respondent's rating of how much the neighborhood has changed and the impact ratings on housing, business mix, and community. Ask for one or two specific, concrete examples they've personally witnessed (a business closing, a longtime neighbor moving out, a new type of housing being built) rather than general impressions. If their overall view is negative, ask what single change would most improve relations between students and long-term residents; if positive, ask what makes the integration work well here.

Q10
객관식필수

How would you describe the day-to-day relationship between students and long-term residents in your neighborhood today?

  • Improving
  • Worsening
  • Staying about the same
  • Little to no interaction either way
Q11
객관식

Which of the following measures would you support to manage the effects of student gentrification in your area? Select all that apply.

  • Caps or controls on rent increases
  • Purpose-built student housing located away from residential streets
  • Licensing requirements for shared student rental properties
  • Community liaison programs between students and residents
  • Limits on how many student rentals are allowed per street
  • No changes needed
Q12
객관식

What is your housing situation?

  • Own my home
  • Rent privately
  • Rent through social or affordable housing
  • Live with family or roommates rent-free
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

What is your age range?

  • 18-24
  • 25-34
  • 35-49
  • 50-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for sharing your perspective. Your answers will feed into a report on how student population growth is reshaping local neighborhoods and what might ease the tension between students and long-term residents.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Opens with a plain-language framing message so respondents (residents, students, or business owners) understand the purpose before answering
  • Combines structured measures — a matrix on how student growth affects specific aspects of the neighborhood, a ranking of top concerns, and multiple-choice questions on housing cost trends and resident-student relations — with an AI follow-up interview that probes the 'why' behind a respondent's change rating
  • Uses a numeric tenure question and housing/age/relationship-to-neighborhood classifiers so reports can be segmented by how long someone has lived there and their stake in the area
  • Closes with a transparent chat message telling respondents their answers feed into a report, and results are compiled into an auto-generated report rather than requiring manual tabulation

QuestionPro

Student Gentrification Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a genuinely comparable template covering the same student-gentrification topic, but it reads as a static sample questionnaire rather than a fielding-ready adaptive instrument. It's useful as a question bank/reference but doesn't include any dynamic follow-up mechanism.

잘하는 점

  • Directly on-topic with pre-written question examples specific to student gentrification
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform with broad distribution and analytics tooling
  • Likely free to browse and copy as a starting question list

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — all respondents see the same fixed question set regardless of their answers, so nuance behind ratings goes uncaptured
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks for deeper qualitative context
  • No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology for how questions were derived

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.