모든 템플릿

Facilities Work Order CSAT Survey

Measures employee satisfaction with facilities maintenance requests—from submission clarity to resolution speed—helping workplace operations teams identify service bottlenecks and communication gaps.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for participating in this survey about your experience with our facilities request process. Your responses will help us identify areas for improvement. This survey takes approximately 10 minutes to complete. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. Participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

Have you submitted a facilities or maintenance request in the past 3 months?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
객관식

How did you submit your most recent facilities request?

  • Helpdesk/Facilities portal
  • Email
  • Chat (Slack/Teams)
  • Phone
  • In person
  • Other (please specify)
Q04
의견 척도

The initial acknowledgment of my request was timely.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with the facilities request process over the past 3 months?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q06
객관식

While a request is in progress, how often would you prefer to receive updates?

  • Only when status changes
  • About once per week
  • Two to three times per week
  • Daily
  • No updates unless there is a delay
Q07
순위 매기기

Please rank the following potential improvements from most to least important.

  1. Clearer submission guidance
  2. Faster initial acknowledgment
  3. Quicker overall resolution
  4. More proactive status updates
  5. Transparent timelines/SLAs
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
장문형

What one change would most improve your facilities request experience?

Q09
객관식

What is your primary work arrangement?

  • Onsite
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform improvements to our facilities services.

Q11
의견 척도

For your most recent request, the steps to submit were clear.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q12
의견 척도

The quality of the completed work met my expectations.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q13
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend our facilities request process to a colleague?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q14
객관식

Which channels work best for receiving status updates on facilities requests? Select up to 3.

  • Email
  • Helpdesk portal notifications
  • Chat (Slack/Teams)
  • SMS/Text
  • Phone call
  • Onsite digital signage
  • Other (please specify)
Q15
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts about your facilities request experience. Our AI moderator may ask a few brief follow-up questions.

Q16
드롭다운

Which department best describes your role?

  • Facilities/Workplace
  • Operations
  • Engineering/IT
  • HR/People
  • Finance
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q17
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take (or has it been) from submission to resolution of your most recent request?

  • Less than 1 day
  • 1–2 days
  • 3–5 days
  • 6–10 days
  • 11–20 days
  • More than 20 days
  • Still open/unresolved
Q18
의견 척도

Communication from the facilities team was clear and helpful throughout the process.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q19
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–3 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
의견 척도

The facilities team was professional and courteous.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q21
객관식

Where is your primary work location?

  • Headquarters
  • Regional office
  • Field site
  • Fully remote
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Covers the full facilities request lifecycle—submission clarity, acknowledgment timeliness, resolution speed, work quality, and communication—in a single instrument rather than just an intake form.
  • Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes open-ended dissatisfaction, going beyond a static open-text box.
  • Segments results by work arrangement, department, tenure, and work location, letting operations teams isolate bottlenecks by employee group.
  • Uses a ranking exercise plus a preference question on update cadence/channels, giving facilities teams prioritized, actionable improvement signals rather than just a satisfaction score.

Jotform

Facilities Work Order Request Form Template

This is an intake/request form for submitting a facilities work order, not a post-service satisfaction survey. It's useful for capturing new requests but doesn't measure how employees felt about the process afterward. Best viewed as a complementary form rather than a direct competitor to a CSAT instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for quick facilities request submission
  • Likely supports file/photo attachments and routing common to Jotform's form builder
  • Simple, familiar form format for employees

아쉬운 점

  • No satisfaction, timeliness, or communication measurement—only intake fields
  • Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up to unpack dissatisfaction
  • No published methodology for scoring or segmenting responses

SurveySparrow

Free Maintenance Work Order Form Template

Positioned as an order form for logging maintenance requests rather than a satisfaction survey. It may capture basic request details but appears focused on operational intake, not resolution experience or communication quality. Useful for request logging, less so for CSAT benchmarking.

잘하는 점

  • Likely offers a conversational, mobile-friendly form format typical of SurveySparrow
  • Free template lowers barrier to quick deployment
  • Framed for maintenance/order-taking workflows

아쉬운 점

  • No apparent post-resolution satisfaction or communication questions
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing of open feedback
  • No transparent scoring methodology or auto-generated CSAT reporting evident

Typeform

Maintenance Work Order Form Template

A request-intake form template for maintenance issues, emphasizing Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time UI. It does not appear to include satisfaction, timeliness, or quality-of-resolution measurement, making it an intake tool rather than a CSAT survey competitor.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational form experience typical of Typeform
  • Likely mobile-responsive and easy to embed
  • Simple structure for quick request submission

아쉬운 점

  • No visible satisfaction, resolution-speed, or communication-quality questions
  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up on open responses
  • No transparent quality scoring or auto-generated operations report

QuestionPro

Client Service Satisfaction Survey Template

A generic client/service satisfaction survey template, not tailored to internal facilities or maintenance work orders. It could be adapted for facilities feedback but lacks facilities-specific stages like submission clarity or acknowledgment timeliness out of the box. More of a general-purpose CSAT starting point than a ready-to-field facilities survey.

잘하는 점

  • Established CSAT question structure (satisfaction, recommend likelihood) applicable across service contexts
  • Backed by QuestionPro's broader survey analytics platform
  • Flexible enough to be customized for various service types

아쉬운 점

  • Not facilities-specific—missing submission, acknowledgment, and resolution-speed questions unless manually added
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe low scores in real time
  • No stated transparent prompt methodology or automated per-response quality scoring

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.