QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Vendor & Supplier Diversity Program Assessment

Evaluates how well your organization sources from certified diverse-owned suppliers — spend levels, barriers, and category priorities — for procurement and sourcing leaders. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs a real recent sourcing decision to surface what actually helped or blocked a diverse supplier from winning the business.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're assessing how vendor diversity actually works in day-to-day sourcing decisions — not just policy on paper. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 6-7 minutes, and your specific examples are the most useful part.

Q02
객관식필수

Which best describes your role in vendor or supplier selection?

  • I make or approve final sourcing decisions
  • I recommend suppliers but someone else approves
  • I manage the supplier diversity program itself
  • I influence budget/requirements but not supplier choice
  • I have no direct role in vendor selection
Q03
숫자

Roughly what percentage of your team's or business unit's procurement spend went to certified diverse-owned suppliers in the last fiscal year? (Enter your best estimate as a whole number, e.g., 15)

Q04
매트릭스필수

How much of a barrier is each of the following when trying to source from diverse-owned suppliers?

7개 행 × 4개 열
  • Finding qualified diverse suppliers in the category we need
  • Verifying or trusting diversity certifications
  • Diverse suppliers' capacity to handle our contract size
  • Budget or pricing pressure favoring incumbent vendors
  • Risk aversion from leadership or legal/compliance
  • 외 2개
열: Not a barrier · Minor barrier · Moderate barrier · Major barrier
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which supplier diversity categories should your organization prioritize expanding over the next year?

  • Women-owned businesses
  • Minority-owned businesses
  • Veteran-owned businesses
  • LGBTQ+-owned businesses
  • Businesses owned by people with disabilities
  • Small and local businesses
  • Employee-owned or worker cooperatives
  • Businesses in economically disadvantaged regions
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest priority최악:Lowest priority
Q06
점수 배분필수

If you had 100 extra points of budget to invest in growing supplier diversity, how would you allocate them across these initiatives?

  • Scouting and identifying new diverse suppliers
  • Helping suppliers get or maintain certification
  • Mentorship and capacity-building for diverse suppliers
  • Contract set-asides or reserved bids for diverse suppliers
  • Training buyers and sourcing teams on inclusive sourcing
  • Better tracking and reporting systems for diverse spend
100점 배분
Q07
의견 척도필수

Compared to your traditional vendors, how satisfied are you with the quality and reliability of the diverse-owned suppliers you've worked with?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Much worse than traditional vendors최대:Much better than traditional vendors
Q08
객관식필수

Does your organization currently have a formal supplier diversity program with defined goals?

  • Yes, with tracked goals and reporting
  • Yes, but goals are informal or untracked
  • In development
  • No formal program
  • Not sure
Q09
평점 척도필수

How would you rate leadership's actual support for vendor diversity goals (budget, time, accountability) versus stated commitment?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Talk only, little real support최대:Strong, resourced support
Q10
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific recent sourcing decision where a diverse-owned supplier was considered — what the requirement was, whether the supplier won the business, and the concrete reason for the outcome (price, capacity, relationship, risk sign-off, etc). If a diverse supplier lost, probe what would have needed to be true for them to win. If they can't recall a specific example, ask why diverse suppliers rarely make it into their consideration set at all.

Q11
메시지

A couple of quick background questions, then you're done.

Q12
객관식

Which department or function are you in?

  • Procurement / Sourcing
  • Finance
  • Operations
  • Legal / Compliance
  • Executive leadership
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How large is your organization by number of employees?

  • Fewer than 250
  • 250-999
  • 1,000-4,999
  • 5,000-19,999
  • 20,000 or more
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your answers feed directly into a report on where our vendor diversity program has real momentum and where it's stuck.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a direct spend-percentage question and a constant-sum budget allocation exercise, so you get quantified current spend and where leaders want to invest next, not just attitudes
  • A matrix question ranks specific sourcing barriers and a MaxDiff question prioritizes which supplier diversity categories to expand, giving decision-ready trade-off data
  • An AI follow-up interview asks the respondent to walk through one real, recent sourcing decision to surface what actually helped or blocked a diverse supplier from winning the business
  • Rating and opinion-scale questions on leadership support and vendor quality satisfaction are paired with role, department, and company-size questions for clean segmentation in the auto-generated report

SurveyMonkey

Vendor Workplace Diversity Survey Template

This is a ready-to-field template on an established survey platform, but its framing leans toward assessing diversity within a vendor's own workplace rather than a procurement team's sourcing spend, barriers, and category priorities. It's a fixed-question template, not an interview instrument. Useful as a quick starting point if you want a generic diversity questionnaire rather than a sourcing-decision assessment.

잘하는 점

  • Deployable immediately on a widely-used survey platform with established distribution and reporting tools
  • Simple, familiar format for respondents
  • Likely easy to customize question wording within SurveyMonkey's editor

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to probe a specific real sourcing decision
  • No mechanism to reconstruct or quantify what helped or blocked a diverse supplier in an actual deal
  • No transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI interview component

Jotform

Supplier Diversity Registration Form Template

This is a supplier-facing registration/intake form, not an internal assessment survey for procurement or sourcing leaders. It's built for collecting supplier certification and contact details, not for measuring program performance, spend levels, or internal barriers. Good for onboarding diverse suppliers, but a different tool for a different job than a program assessment.

잘하는 점

  • Drag-and-drop form builder makes it easy to customize registration fields
  • Suited for collecting structured supplier certification and contact data
  • Familiar, quick-to-complete form format for external suppliers

아쉬운 점

  • Not designed to assess internal spend levels, barriers, or category priorities at all
  • Static form fields with no adaptive follow-up questioning
  • No way to capture the narrative of a specific sourcing decision or surface what helped/blocked a supplier

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기