QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Price Sensitivity & Willingness-to-Pay Assessment

Measures price fairness perceptions, value-for-money judgments, and maximum willingness to pay among recent price-exposed prospects and customers. Ideal for pricing optimization, launch pricing validation, and competitive positioning research.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 19개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This brief survey asks about your perceptions of pricing and value for a product you've recently considered. Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 9 minutes to complete.

Q02
객관식

When did you most recently encounter or look up the price for this product?

  • Within the last 7 days
  • 8–30 days ago
  • 1–3 months ago
  • More than 3 months ago
  • I have never seen a price for this product
Q03
객관식

Which of the following best describes what you did after seeing that price?

  • Purchased at that price
  • Started checkout but did not complete the purchase
  • Decided not to purchase at that time
  • Still considering / have not decided yet
Q04
의견 척도

How fair did the price feel to you?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q05
장문형

What is the most you would be willing to pay for this product (in your local currency)? Please enter a number only.

Q06
순위 매기기

Please rank the following factors by how much they influenced what you would pay for this product, from most to least influential.

  1. Product quality and features
  2. Brand reputation and trust
  3. Prices of similar or competing products
  4. Customer reviews and ratings
  5. My personal budget
  6. Urgency of my need
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about the pricing and value of this product.

Q08
객관식

What is your age group?

  • Under 18
  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for your time and thoughtful feedback! Your responses will help us better understand pricing perceptions and deliver better value. You may now close this window.

Q10
의견 척도

How familiar are you with this type of product?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all familiar최대:Extremely familiar
Q11
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the price you paid?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q12
의견 척도

Overall, how would you rate the value for money of this product?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very poor value최대:Excellent value
Q13
장문형

Below what price would you begin to question the quality of this product? Please enter a number only.

Q14
객관식

Which of the following best describes your role in deciding whether to purchase this product?

  • I am the sole decision-maker
  • I share the decision with others
  • I influence the decision but do not make it
  • I am not involved in the purchase decision
Q15
객관식

Did you use any discount, promotional offer, or coupon code on that purchase?

  • Yes
  • No
  • I don't remember
Q16
객관식

Compared with what you expected, the price you saw was…

  • Much lower than expected
  • Slightly lower than expected
  • About what I expected
  • Slightly higher than expected
  • Much higher than expected
Q17
의견 척도

How confident are you in the prices you just provided?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q18
객관식

What was the main reason you did not complete the purchase at that time?

  • Price was too high
  • Waiting for a sale or discount
  • Comparing alternatives
  • Not urgent right now
  • Payment, shipping, or checkout concerns
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
장문형

At that time, what price (in your local currency) would have felt reasonable to you for this product? Please enter a number only.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • AI interviews dynamically explore value perceptions, competitive context, and emotional drivers that static WTP questions cannot capture
  • Combines complementary pricing questions (price-quality threshold, direct willingness-to-pay, and price-fairness ratings) in a single adaptive survey flow
  • Every AI parameter is logged for replication—ideal for academic pricing research and peer-reviewed publication
  • Unique focus on pricing fairness, transparency, and trust—not just optimal price points—addresses growing consumer demand for ethical pricing
  • AI follow-ups explore emotional and ethical dimensions of price perception that static surveys fundamentally cannot reach

SurveyMonkey

Price Testing Survey Template

SurveyMonkey's 6-question price testing template focuses on gauging whether consumers feel they're over- or underpaying. It covers the basics of competitive price perception but lacks depth—no WTP methodology framework, no follow-up probing, and limited to static closed-ended questions.

잘하는 점

  • Concise 6-question format reduces respondent fatigue
  • Expert-certified template with proven question design
  • Integrated with SurveyMonkey's analytics for automatic results summaries and crosstab reports

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-powered follow-up questions to explore the 'why' behind willingness to pay
  • Static questions cannot adapt based on respondent's initial price reactions
  • No formal WTP or Van Westendorp methodology built into the template
  • Free tier limited to 10 questions per survey—advanced features require paid plans

Qualtrics

Free Pricing Survey Template

Qualtrics' pricing survey template blends multiple techniques (familiarity, value perception, budget allocation) into a single instrument with Ph.D.-designed methodology. It's comprehensive and research-grade but expensive, complex to set up, and lacks real-time conversational depth.

잘하는 점

  • Ph.D.-designed methodology blending three pricing research techniques into one instrument
  • Framework for ongoing research to continuously optimize prices
  • Part of a comprehensive marketplace with 50+ expert-built survey templates

아쉬운 점

  • No real-time AI conversational follow-ups during data collection
  • Enterprise pricing is prohibitive—paid plans start at ~$420/month
  • Complex setup may overwhelm researchers without dedicated Qualtrics expertise
  • No prompt or model transparency for any AI-assisted features

Typeform

Pricing Survey Template

Typeform's pricing survey template helps gauge how compelling prices are and identify value-for-money improvements. The conversational UX is engaging, and shareable reports with export capabilities streamline analysis. However, it's a general-purpose pricing feedback form without formal WTP methodology.

잘하는 점

  • Engaging conversational interface that keeps respondents completing surveys
  • Shareable reports with export to spreadsheets and integration with tools like HubSpot
  • Easy to customize and deploy with no coding required

아쉬운 점

  • No formal willingness-to-pay methodology (Van Westendorp, Gabor-Granger, or conjoint)
  • No AI follow-up questions to dig deeper into price sensitivity reasoning
  • General-purpose pricing feedback—not designed for rigorous pricing research
  • No built-in analytical framework for determining optimal price points

Jotform

Pricing Estimation Survey

Jotform's Pricing Estimation Survey is a basic template for checking whether prices are suitable for customers. It's free, embeddable, and easy to customize but functions as a simple feedback form rather than a methodologically sound pricing research instrument.

잘하는 점

  • Free to use with drag-and-drop builder and no coding required
  • Can be embedded on websites, shared via link, or collected via QR code
  • Integrates with 100+ tools for automatic response routing

아쉬운 점

  • No willingness-to-pay methodology—just basic pricing feedback questions
  • No AI capabilities of any kind for adaptive questioning or analysis
  • No statistical analysis tools for pricing research
  • No survey methodology guidance or academic rigor in template design

SurveySparrow

Product Pricing Survey Template

SurveySparrow's Product Pricing Survey template uses display/skip logic and Google Sheets integration for response collection. It's designed to help understand customer behavior and arrive at optimal pricing, with multi-channel distribution. However, it lacks formal pricing research methodology and AI depth.

잘하는 점

  • Display/skip logic makes the survey adaptive based on prior answers
  • Direct Google Sheets integration for real-time response collection
  • Multi-channel distribution via email, SMS, and weblinks

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-powered conversational follow-ups during survey
  • No formal WTP or pricing sensitivity methodology built in
  • Basic skip logic is no substitute for true AI-driven adaptive interviewing
  • No transparency into how AI features work or what models are used

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기