모든 템플릿

Online Recruitment & Candidate Experience Survey

Captures how candidates actually experience your online hiring process — from finding the posting to receiving a decision — including friction points, communication gaps, and employer brand impact. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific moment that shaped their impression, not just a generic rating.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your experience applying with us online! Your feedback helps us make the hiring process smoother for future candidates. This should take about 8 minutes, and your responses will be kept confidential.

Q02
객관식필수

Which channel led you to this job opportunity?

  • Company careers website
  • LinkedIn
  • Job board (e.g., Indeed, Glassdoor)
  • Employee referral
  • Recruiter outreach
  • Social media
Q03
의견 척도필수

How clear was the job posting about the role's responsibilities and requirements?

척도: 15
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q04
평점 척도필수

How easy was it to complete the online application itself (forms, uploads, account creation)?

범위: 15
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q05
매트릭스

Please rate each part of your recruitment experience:

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Online application portal
  • Communication/updates during the process
  • Interview scheduling
  • Assessment or skills test
  • Interviewer preparedness
: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q06
의견 척도필수

Based on this recruitment experience, how likely are you to recommend applying to (Replace with Company Name) to a friend or colleague?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q07
객관식필수

What was the single biggest source of friction in your application process?

  • Unclear job requirements
  • Slow response times
  • Confusing online application system
  • Too many steps or interview rounds
  • Lack of communication or status updates
  • Technical issues with the portal
  • None — the process was smooth
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific moment that most shaped this candidate's overall impression — anchor on the friction point they selected and the recommendation score they gave. Ask what exactly happened, when in the process it occurred, and what a better experience would have looked like. If they said the process was smooth, probe what stood out positively and whether anything still felt slow or unclear even if not a dealbreaker.

Q09
객관식필수

What was the outcome of your application?

  • Received and accepted an offer
  • Received an offer but declined
  • Rejected after one or more interviews
  • Rejected without an interview
  • Withdrew my application
  • Still in process
Q10
장문형

If you could change one thing about our online recruitment process, what would it be?

Q11
숫자

Roughly how many days passed between submitting your application and receiving a final decision (or today, if still in process)?

Q12
객관식

Which age range do you fall into?

  • Under 25
  • 25-34
  • 35-44
  • 45-54
  • 55-64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

That wraps up the survey — thank you for your honesty! Your answers will feed directly into a report on where our online recruitment process succeeds and where we need to improve for future candidates.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the specific moment that shaped the candidate's impression, rather than stopping at a generic rating
  • Combines structured metrics (opinion scales, a matrix rating of each recruitment stage, a numeric time-to-decision question) with open-ended and conversational follow-up for richer context
  • Pinpoints friction with a direct multiple-choice question on the biggest source of friction, then lets the AI probe deeper only where it matters
  • Captures the full funnel from channel discovery through outcome and employer-brand recommendation likelihood, with transparent chat-style framing for respondents

SurveyMonkey

Online Employee Recruitment Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready template covering recruitment channel effectiveness and applicant impressions with SurveyMonkey's usual question bank and reporting. It's built for broad benchmarking rather than reconstructing individual candidate moments. Good for quick deployment but relies on fixed question sets.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use template backed by a mature survey platform
  • Established reporting and benchmarking tools
  • Easy distribution across channels

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent gets the same static items regardless of answers
  • No voice interview or screen-share task option for candidates to demonstrate friction points
  • No transparent, per-question prompt methodology or automated qualitative scoring of open responses

SurveySparrow

Candidate Experience Survey Template

A conversational-style template focused on candidate experience feedback, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like survey format. It emphasizes a friendlier respondent experience but still uses predetermined question flows. There's no indication of AI-driven follow-up probing into specific moments.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format improves completion rates
  • Purpose-built for candidate experience feedback
  • Mobile-friendly presentation

아쉬운 점

  • Conversational UI is scripted, not adaptive — it cannot dynamically probe a candidate's specific answer with AI-generated follow-ups
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task capability
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of qualitative answers

Jotform

Candidate Experience Survey Form Template

A customizable form-builder template for gathering candidate experience feedback, well suited to quick setup and integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem. It's a static form rather than an interview experience, so all respondents see the same fixed questions. Strong for basic data collection, weaker for narrative depth.

잘하는 점

  • Highly customizable form fields and design via Jotform's builder
  • Easy integrations with other Jotform workflows and apps
  • Simple setup for teams already using Jotform

아쉬운 점

  • Static form structure with no adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore a candidate's specific experience
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports beyond standard form analytics

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.