Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Academic Advising Session Satisfaction Survey
Measures student satisfaction, perceived quality, and outcomes after academic advising sessions. Designed for institutional advising offices seeking actionable feedback to improve service delivery.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q02
객관식
When was your most recent academic advising interaction?
- Within the last 2 weeks
- 2–4 weeks ago
- 1–3 months ago
- 3–6 months ago
- More than 6 months ago
- I have not met with an academic advisor
Q03
드롭다운
How many advising sessions have you had this academic term?
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 or more
Q04
의견 척도
How clearly did your advisor explain your academic options and next steps?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all clearly최대:Extremely clearly
Q05
객관식
Which of the following outcomes did you leave your advising interaction with? Select all that apply.
- A plan for next term's courses
- An updated degree audit or plan
- Referrals to campus resources
- Financial aid or policy guidance
- Steps for academic improvement
- Career or internship advice
- None of the above
Q06
AI 인터뷰
We'd like to understand your advising experience in more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about what worked well and what could be improved.
Q07
객관식
What is your current student status?
- Undergraduate—first year
- Undergraduate—second year
- Undergraduate—third year
- Undergraduate—fourth year or more
- Graduate—master's
- Graduate—doctoral
- Professional/other graduate
- Non-degree/continuing education
- Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지
Thank you for completing this survey! Your feedback is valuable and will be used to improve academic advising services at your institution.
Q09
객관식
How did your most recent advising interaction take place?
- In person
- Video call
- Phone
- Email or chat
- Group workshop
Q10
의견 척도
How knowledgeable was your advisor about your degree requirements and academic policies?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all knowledgeable최대:Extremely knowledgeable
Q11
장문형
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or suggestions about your academic advising experience.
Q12
드롭다운
Which best describes your primary field of study?
- Arts and humanities
- Business
- Education
- Engineering
- Health professions
- Natural sciences
- Social sciences
- Computer and information sciences
- Law or public policy
- Undeclared
- Other (please specify)
Q13
드롭다운
How long did you wait between booking and your advising session?
- Less than 1 day
- 1–3 days
- 4–7 days
- 8–14 days
- More than 2 weeks
- I did not need to book (walk-in)
Q14
의견 척도
How well did your advisor listen to and address your individual concerns?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all well최대:Extremely well
Q15
객관식
What is your enrollment status this term?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Prefer not to say
Q16
의견 척도
Overall, how satisfied are you with your most recent advising experience?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all satisfied최대:Extremely satisfied
Q17
객관식
What is your age range?
- Under 18
- 18–20
- 21–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도
How likely are you to recommend your advisor to another student?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q19
객관식
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q20
드롭다운
Where is your institution located?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- Latin America & Caribbean
- Middle East
- North America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
Q21
객관식
Are you a first-generation college student? (Neither parent/guardian has a bachelor's degree.)
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes five distinct opinion-scale ratings (clarity of options explained, advisor knowledge of degree requirements, listening/responsiveness, overall satisfaction, and likelihood to recommend) for granular, benchmarkable service-quality data rather than a single satisfaction score.
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that can probe deeper into a student's advising experience in their own words, going beyond a static open-text box.
- Captures session logistics and context (mode of interaction, wait time between booking and session, sessions taken this term, outcomes achieved) alongside demographic and equity-relevant fields like first-generation status and field of study, enabling segmentation advising offices actually need.
- Pairs an open-text reflection question with automated, transparent-prompt AI reporting so advising offices get a synthesized summary instead of raw unstructured comments to read manually.
Jotform
Academic Advising Form TemplateThis is a fielding-ready, customizable form template built for capturing academic advising information via Jotform's drag-and-drop builder. It's the most directly comparable of the reviewed pages since it targets the same academic advising context, though it appears structured more as a general intake/feedback form than a dedicated satisfaction-and-outcomes research instrument. No AI-driven follow-up or automated response scoring is indicated.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the academic advising use case, unlike generic service-satisfaction templates
- No-code drag-and-drop customization typical of Jotform's builder, easy to adapt field labels and layout
- Backed by Jotform's broad template library and integrations ecosystem
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice AI interview option — questions are static and identical for every respondent
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers
- No indication of transparent, publishable AI prompt methodology since the product is a form builder, not an AI-interview platform
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.