Employee Internet Usage & Access at Work Survey
Measures how employees actually use the internet during the workday, how well current access and content policies support their jobs, and where blocked sites or unclear rules slow people down. Built for HR and IT teams reviewing acceptable-use policies, with an AI follow-up that digs into the specific moment access got in someone's way instead of a generic complaint.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In a typical workday, which of these do you use the internet at work for?
- Core job tasks and research
- Internal communication tools (email, chat, video calls)
- Coordinating with external partners or clients
- Professional development or learning
- Social media
- News or entertainment during breaks
- Personal errands (banking, shopping, appointments)
Roughly how much of your work-day internet time goes toward each of these?
- Work-related tasks and research
- Internal communication tools
- Social media
- News or entertainment
- Personal errands or shopping
How much does your internet access at work support you in doing your job well?
How much do you agree with each statement about internet access and policy where you work?
- Our internet and website policies are clearly communicated
- I can access the sites and tools I need for my job
- Blocked or restricted sites regularly get in the way of my work
- I understand what internet activity, if any, is monitored
In the last 30 days, how often have you been unable to access a site or tool you needed for work?
- Never
- Rarely (once or twice)
- Occasionally (a few times a week)
- Frequently (almost daily)
Anchor on whichever is more relevant to this respondent: their agreement level with 'blocked or restricted sites get in the way of my work' or their reported frequency of being unable to access something needed for the job. Get a specific, recent example — what site or tool, what task it blocked, and what they did instead (worked around it, asked IT, gave up, used a personal device). If they say access is fine, probe whether that's because policy is well-designed or because they simply don't test its limits.
How comfortable are you with the company's current approach to monitoring internet use at work?
What device do you primarily use to access the internet for work tasks?
- Company-issued laptop or desktop
- Personal computer
- Company-issued mobile device
- Personal mobile device
- A mix of company and personal devices
Which department are you part of?
- (Replace with Department A)
- (Replace with Department B)
- (Replace with Department C)
- (Replace with Department D)
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been with the company?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 2 years
- 2-5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
All done — thank you! Your responses will be combined with your colleagues' to help us shape clearer, fairer internet and access policies. No individual answers are shared outside the HR/IT review team.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a static questionnaire with an AI follow-up interview that anchors on each respondent's actual agreement level or reported access barrier, so IT/HR get the specific moment a blocked site or unclear rule slowed someone down rather than a generic complaint.
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales on job support and monitoring comfort, a slider matrix on how work-day internet time is actually spent, a matrix of policy agreement statements) with the qualitative depth of an adaptive interview.
- Captures context needed for policy review — device used, department, tenure, and frequency of access failures in the last 30 days — so results can be segmented by team and role.
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean HR/IT don't have to manually sift open-text responses to find the useful signal.
SurveyMonkey
General Internet Usage Survey TemplateA ready-to-field, general-purpose internet usage template rather than one tuned to workplace acceptable-use policy review. Good for a quick pulse-check on internet habits, but not built around HR/IT policy questions like blocked-site friction or monitoring comfort. Standard SurveyMonkey deployment, sharing, and reporting tools apply.
잘하는 점
- Established, easy-to-deploy survey platform with broad distribution options
- Built-in analytics and benchmarking dashboards
- Simple to customize question wording and branching for general use cases
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual answers
- No mechanism to automatically score response quality or flag vague/low-effort answers
- Not framed around workplace acceptable-use policy or access-blocking specifics
Jotform
Internet Usage Survey TemplateA customizable, ready-to-field form-builder template for general internet usage data collection. Strong on form design flexibility and integrations, but it's a fixed question flow with no interview-style probing of individual responses. Suited to simple data capture rather than deep policy diagnosis.
잘하는 점
- Drag-and-drop form customization with Jotform's wide integration ecosystem
- Fast to launch and embed across channels
- Supports conditional logic for basic branching
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to dig into why a specific access issue occurred
- No automated per-response quality scoring
- No published methodology or prompt transparency behind question logic
SurveySparrow
Internet Usage Survey Questionnaire TemplateA conversational-style, chat-like survey template for general internet usage, listed under SurveySparrow's marketing templates rather than HR/IT policy tooling. The conversational UI is friendlier than a plain form but still runs a fixed script rather than adapting questions to what a respondent says.
잘하는 점
- Chat-style conversational format that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
- Mobile-friendly presentation
- Quick to customize for marketing or general-audience surveys
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question flow — no true adaptive AI follow-up based on individual responses
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
- Positioned for marketing use cases, not built for HR/IT acceptable-use policy review
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.