QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Employee Performance Self-Assessment & Growth Survey

A structured self-assessment covering goal achievement, manager support, and growth priorities for the current review period, for use in performance reviews or pulse check-ins. An AI follow-up interview reconstructs the specific achievement or obstacle behind the respondent's self-rating instead of leaving it as an abstract number.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 14개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on this review period. Your honest input helps shape coaching, goals, and recognition going forward. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 5-6 minutes and your individual responses are shared only with HR and your manager as part of the review process.

Q02
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate your own performance during this review period?

척도: 1 – 10
최소:Well below expectations최대:Far exceeded expectations
Q03
매트릭스필수

How would you rate yourself on each of the following this period?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Quality of work
  • Meeting deadlines
  • Collaboration with teammates
  • Taking initiative
  • Communication with stakeholders
열: Needs improvement · Developing · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations · Outstanding
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 90 days, how often did you receive specific, actionable feedback from your manager (not just general praise)?

  • Never
  • Rarely (once or twice total)
  • Sometimes (about monthly)
  • Often (about biweekly)
  • Every week or more
Q05
평점 척도필수

How supported do you feel by your manager in achieving your goals?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not supported at all최대:Extremely well supported
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these would do the most to improve your performance and growth going forward? Pick the most and least impactful each round.

  • More skill-building or training
  • More mentorship or coaching
  • More autonomy over how I work
  • More recognition for good work
  • Clearer career path or promotion criteria
  • Better tools or resources
  • More reasonable workload
  • Clearer, more specific goals
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most impactful최악:Least impactful
Q07
점수 배분필수

Distribute 100 points across the factors that most drove your performance this period, based on how much each helped or hurt.

  • Manager support
  • Team collaboration
  • Tools and resources
  • Workload and capacity
  • Clarity of goals
  • My own motivation and effort
100점 배분
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct one specific, concrete moment from this review period that best explains the respondent's self-rating: a project, decision, or interaction, what they did, and the outcome. If they rated themselves highly, probe what made it possible and whether it's repeatable; if they rated themselves lower, probe the single biggest obstacle and whether it was within their control, their manager's control, or neither. Anchor on specifics, not general impressions.

Q09
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend your team as a great place to work to a friend or former colleague?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q10
메시지

Almost done — just a few optional background questions to help us look at patterns fairly across teams. Feel free to skip any of these.

Q11
드롭다운

Which department or function are you part of?

  • Engineering / Product
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Success / Support
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • People / HR
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been in your current role?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 3-5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
객관식

Which best describes your current level?

  • Individual contributor
  • Team lead / senior IC
  • People manager
  • Director or above
  • Prefer not to say
Q14
메시지

Thank you for reflecting so openly on your performance. Your ratings and comments will feed directly into your upcoming review conversation and help us spot where more support or recognition is needed.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an opinion-scale self-rating plus a matrix breakdown across specific performance dimensions, so the review captures both an overall number and category-level detail
  • Pairs a constant-sum allocation and max-diff prioritization exercise to quantify which factors actually drove performance and what would most improve growth going forward, rather than relying on open text alone
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct the concrete achievement or obstacle behind the respondent's self-rating, turning an abstract number into a specific story
  • Adds manager-support and eNPS-style questions alongside optional department/tenure/level background questions, enabling segment-level reporting without lengthening the core survey

QuestionPro

Short Employee Performance Review Survey

A short, static employee performance review survey aimed at identifying growth opportunities. It's a fielding-ready template with standard rating and feedback questions, but it relies on fixed question text with no mechanism to probe deeper into any single response.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use template focused specifically on growth opportunities
  • Backed by a broad established survey platform with reporting/analytics tools
  • Short format likely to have low completion friction

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up to dig into a specific rating
  • No published methodology for how questions were validated or scored
  • No voice-based interview option for richer qualitative detail

Jotform

Pharmacy Employee Performance Review Form Template

A form template built specifically for pharmacy employee evaluations rather than general employee self-assessment, so it's narrower in scope than a cross-functional performance review. It's a fillable form template, easily customized via Jotform's builder, but it is a static evaluation form rather than an interview-driven survey.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for a specific industry use case (pharmacy)
  • Easy to customize using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
  • Fielding-ready as a standard evaluation form

아쉬운 점

  • Industry-specific framing makes it a poor fit for general employee self-assessment
  • No adaptive follow-up or AI-driven probing of responses
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative reports

SurveyMonkey

Employee Performance Survey Template

A general-purpose employee performance survey template from a major survey platform, fielding-ready with standard rating and multiple-choice questions. It covers common performance review dimensions but, like other static templates, doesn't adapt to individual answers.

잘하는 점

  • Well-known platform with strong distribution and reporting features
  • Template covers standard performance review dimensions
  • Easy to launch and customize quickly

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to reconstruct the story behind a self-rating
  • No voice AI interview option for qualitative depth
  • No transparent, publishable question/prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Sample Product Manager Performance Review Template

A role-specific performance review template designed for evaluating product managers, typically completed by a manager or peer rather than as an employee self-assessment. It's a fielding-ready template but narrower in audience and framed around a single job role rather than general self-reflection.

잘하는 점

  • Tailored questions specific to product manager responsibilities
  • Conversational survey format that can feel more engaging than plain forms
  • Fielding-ready template requiring minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • Built for evaluating one specific role rather than general employee self-assessment
  • No adaptive AI interview to surface the concrete moment behind a rating
  • No stated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기