모든 템플릿

Community Microgrid Attitudes & Governance Preferences Survey

Measures resident support for community microgrids, preferred ownership models, participation willingness, and priority tradeoffs. Designed for municipal planners and civic organizations assessing community readiness for local energy infrastructure.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 21개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This brief survey (about 10 minutes) asks for your views on community energy options. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate to inform local energy planning. Participation is voluntary, and you may skip any question or stop at any time.

Q02
객관식

How familiar are you with the idea of "microgrids"?

  • Very familiar
  • Somewhat familiar
  • Heard the term, not sure what it means
  • Not at all familiar
Q03
의견 척도

If your community proposed building a microgrid within the next 3 years, how much would you support or oppose it?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly oppose최대:Strongly support
Q04
객관식

Which ownership or management model would you most prefer for a community microgrid?

  • City or public agency ownership
  • Electric utility ownership
  • Community cooperative
  • Private company under regulation
  • Public–private partnership
  • Not sure
Q05
객관식

If a community microgrid were offered locally, how would you prefer to participate? Select up to three.

  • Join as a subscriber or customer
  • Host rooftop solar and/or a battery if eligible
  • Allow use of smart thermostat/appliances for demand response
  • Share my energy data for planning (with privacy safeguards)
  • Attend community meetings or advisory group
  • Prefer not to participate
  • Other (please specify)
Q06
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your views on community energy in a bit more depth. An AI interviewer will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier answers.

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for participating! Your input will help inform local energy planning and community engagement on microgrids. Results will be shared in aggregate with community stakeholders.

Q09
메시지

For this survey, a microgrid is a local energy network with its own power sources (such as solar panels) and storage (such as batteries). It can operate with the main electric grid or independently during outages to keep power on for a neighborhood, campus, or critical facilities.

Q10
의견 척도

How likely would you be to recommend a community microgrid project to your neighbors?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q11
의견 척도

How much do you trust your local electric utility to operate a community microgrid effectively?

척도: 17
최소:Do not trust at all최대:Trust completely
Q12
순위 매기기

Please rank the following priorities for a community microgrid from most to least important.

  1. Reliability during outages
  2. Affordability for households
  3. Reducing greenhouse gas emissions
  4. Fair and inclusive access
  5. Local decision-making
  6. Speed of deployment
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q13
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else local officials should consider about microgrids in your area?

Q14
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

What concerns, if any, would you have about a local microgrid? Select all that apply.

  • Higher utility bills
  • Equity or fairness across neighborhoods
  • Noise or siting impacts
  • Privacy or data-sharing concerns
  • Visual impact of equipment
  • Distrust in the organizations running it
  • Prefer other community investments
  • Not enough information to decide
  • No concerns
  • Other (please specify)
Q16
객관식

If a microgrid provided at least 4 hours of backup power for key services during an outage, what change to your monthly electric bill would be acceptable to you?

  • $0 (no increase)
  • Up to $5
  • $6–$10
  • $11–$20
  • More than $20
  • Not sure
Q17
객관식

Which best describes where you live?

  • Urban
  • Suburban
  • Small town
  • Rural
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
객관식

Which potential benefits of a community microgrid matter most to you? Select up to three.

  • Improved reliability during outages
  • Lower monthly energy bills
  • Cleaner local energy
  • Local decision-making and control
  • Economic development and local jobs
  • Resilience for critical services (e.g., water, shelters)
  • None of these
  • Other (please specify)
Q19
드롭다운

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school diploma or GED
  • Some college or associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Graduate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q20
드롭다운

What best describes your current employment status?

  • Employed full time
  • Employed part time
  • Self-employed
  • Unemployed and looking for work
  • Unemployed and not looking for work
  • Student
  • Homemaker or caregiver
  • Retired
  • Unable to work
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
객관식

What is your current housing situation?

  • Own my home
  • Rent my home
  • Live with family or guardians
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview segment that lets residents elaborate in their own words on community energy attitudes, beyond fixed-choice answers
  • Combines opinion-scale, ranking, and multiple-choice questions to capture nuanced tradeoffs (trust in utilities, ownership models, priority ranking) that static satisfaction surveys don't structure this way
  • Captures demographic context (age, housing situation, employment, education) alongside attitudinal data, enabling municipal planners to segment readiness by resident profile
  • Ends with an open-text prompt asking what local officials should know, giving qualitative signal that feeds into an auto-generated report

SurveySparrow

Resident Satisfaction Survey Template

This is a general resident satisfaction template aimed at municipalities or property managers, not an energy- or microgrid-specific instrument. It's a fielding-ready static form covering broad community services, so it would need substantial rebuilding to address microgrid ownership models, backup-power tradeoffs, or utility trust. Useful as a generic community-survey reference point rather than a direct competitor on this specific topic.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-deploy template aimed at municipal/resident audiences
  • Likely supports standard survey logic and reporting typical of SurveySparrow's platform
  • Positioned for local government or community-management use cases

아쉬운 점

  • No indication of adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe individual resident reasoning
  • Not tailored to energy infrastructure topics like microgrid ownership models or backup power priorities
  • No transparent, publishable methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted

SurveyMonkey

HOA Survey Template: Questions for Homeowners

This template is built for homeowners associations gauging resident sentiment on community rules and amenities, which overlaps only loosely with municipal energy-infrastructure planning. It's a static, fielding-ready questionnaire rather than anything microgrid- or governance-of-infrastructure specific. Best viewed as an adjacent community-feedback format rather than a true topical competitor.

잘하는 점

  • Established, ready-to-use survey format for homeowner/resident feedback
  • Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analytics tools
  • Familiar structure for gauging community sentiment on local issues

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice-AI component to explore resident reasoning in depth
  • Content is oriented to HOA governance topics, not energy infrastructure, ownership models, or backup-power tradeoffs
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology disclosed

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.