Employee Computer Security Awareness & Behavior Survey
Measures how employees actually handle passwords, multi-factor authentication, updates, and suspicious messages day to day — not just what they know in theory. Built for IT and security teams auditing awareness programs, with an AI follow-up that reconstructs a real near-miss or incident instead of a hypothetical one.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
How often do you do each of the following at work?
- Use a different password for each work account
- Turn on multi-factor authentication when it's offered
- Lock your screen when stepping away from your desk
- Install security updates within a few days of release
- Report suspicious emails or messages to IT/security
How confident are you that you could spot a phishing email or message aimed at you?
In the last 12 months, which of the following happened to you at work? (Select all that apply)
- Clicked a link or opened an attachment I later suspected was malicious
- Got a suspicious login alert or had an account temporarily locked
- Used a personal device or workaround to get around a security restriction
- Reported a phishing attempt to IT/security
- None of the above
Which of these would do the most, and the least, to improve security where you work?
- Company-provided password manager
- Mandatory multi-factor authentication on all systems
- Regular phishing simulation exercises
- Shorter, more frequent security training sessions
- Faster patching/updates on company devices
- A clearer process for reporting suspicious activity
- Stronger endpoint protection/antivirus tools
How would you rate the support you get from IT/security when you have a question or concern?
In the last 12 months, how many times has your company provided security training (e.g., phishing simulations, workshops, mandatory modules)?
- None
- Once
- Two or three times
- Four or more times
- Not sure
Reconstruct the respondent's most recent security incident or near-miss at work — what happened, how they noticed something was off (or didn't), what they did next, and whether they reported it. Anchor on specifics: the type of message or event, the time pressure they were under, and what tool or step (if any) would have stopped it earlier. If they say nothing has ever happened to them, probe what would make them pause before clicking a link or attachment today.
What's the one thing that would make it easier for you to follow good security practices at work?
Which best describes your team or department?
- Engineering/IT
- Sales/Marketing
- Finance/Operations
- Customer Support
- HR/People
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How large is your organization?
- Under 50
- 50-250
- 251-1,000
- 1,001-5,000
- More than 5,000
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thank you! Your responses feed into a report on real-world security habits and gaps, which IT and security teams will use to shape upcoming training and tools.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a matrix question on how often employees actually perform day-to-day security behaviors (password habits, updates, etc.), not just attitudes
- Uses an AI follow-up interview to reconstruct a real recent near-miss or incident instead of relying on a generic hypothetical scenario
- Pairs a self-rated confidence scale on spotting phishing with a max-diff question ranking what would most improve security, giving both perception and priority data
- Closes with an open short-text question on what would make good security practices easier, plus context questions (team, org size) so IT/security teams can segment the auto-generated report
QuestionPro
Computer security survey questions + sample questionnaire templateThis is a sample questionnaire and question-bank page rather than a single fielding-ready survey instance, aimed at giving survey builders a starting question set. It covers general computer security topics but reads more like reference content than a purpose-built behavior audit. Useful for browsing question ideas, less so as a ready-to-send employee survey.
잘하는 점
- Provides a broad bank of computer security question examples
- Backed by an established survey platform with standard reporting/analytics tooling
아쉬운 점
- Static question list with no adaptive follow-up to probe individual incidents
- No mechanism to reconstruct a specific near-miss or automatically score response quality
Jotform
Security Awareness Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, oriented toward quick internal distribution. It's a static question set that can be edited but doesn't adapt based on answers. Good for basic awareness check-ins, not for deep behavioral or incident-level detail.
잘하는 점
- Easy to customize and deploy quickly via a familiar form builder
- Supports standard form logic like conditional show/hide fields
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interviewing or voice interview option to dig into real incidents
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
SurveyMonkey
Security Awareness Survey TemplateA prebuilt static template on a mainstream survey platform, likely covering general awareness and training-recall questions similar to a standard knowledge check. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's broad distribution and analytics features, but the questionnaire itself is fixed once deployed. There's no indication of incident reconstruction or behavior-specific drill-down.
잘하는 점
- Widely used platform with strong distribution and baseline analytics
- Quick to launch with minimal setup for general awareness pulse checks
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question set with no adaptive follow-up questioning
- No voice-based interview option or automated quality scoring of open responses
SurveySparrow
Information Security Risk Assessment QuestionnaireThis template is framed as a risk assessment questionnaire, which overlaps with security awareness but leans more toward organizational/compliance risk scoring than individual day-to-day behavior. It's a static form, though SurveySparrow's platform does support conversational-style UI for surveys. It's a reasonable adjacent option but not purpose-built to capture personal near-miss incidents.
잘하는 점
- Conversational chat-style survey UI can feel less clinical than a plain form
- Template framing suits broader risk/compliance assessment use cases
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI-driven follow-up to reconstruct a specific incident
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or interpreted
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.