모든 템플릿

Executive Director Annual Performance Evaluation

A confidential board-administered review of the Executive Director's leadership, financial stewardship, fundraising, staff culture, and governance partnership. Combines multi-area rating batteries, a prioritization exercise, and an AI follow-up interview that digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating and contract recommendation, giving the board a richer picture than scores alone.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thank you for taking part in (Replace with Organization Name)'s annual review of our Executive Director. Your honest, specific feedback helps the board support and develop strong leadership. This should take about 8-10 minutes, and your individual responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate to the board chair. (Template note: replace the organization name placeholder before launching and confirm your confidentiality process with the board.)

Q02
슬라이더 매트릭스필수

Rate the Executive Director's performance in each area below, from a significant gap to outstanding.

6개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
  • Strategic leadership and vision-setting
  • Financial management and fiscal oversight
  • Fundraising and resource development
  • Staff leadership and organizational culture
  • Support for board governance and decision-making
  • 외 1개
슬라이더 0–10최소:Significant gap최대:Outstanding
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about the Executive Director's day-to-day working relationship with the board?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • Provides the board with timely, accurate information for decision-making
  • Proactively flags risks, problems, or bad news rather than waiting to be asked
  • Follows through on commitments made to the board
  • Models the organization's stated values in their own conduct
: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effectively is the Executive Director leading (Replace with Organization Name) toward its mission right now?

척도: 110
최소:Not effectively at all최대:Extremely effectively
Q05
객관식필수

Compared to one year ago, how would you describe the Executive Director's performance?

  • Declined significantly
  • Declined somewhat
  • Stayed about the same
  • Improved somewhat
  • Improved significantly
  • I wasn't on the board / can't compare
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these areas is most important for the Executive Director to focus on developing over the next year, and which is least important right now?

  • Strategic planning and vision-setting
  • Financial oversight and budgeting discipline
  • Fundraising strategy and donor cultivation
  • Staff development and organizational culture
  • Board communication and partnership
  • Succession and leadership pipeline planning
  • Community and external relations
  • Change management and innovation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to develop최악:Least important right now
Q07
객관식필수

Based on current performance, what is your recommendation regarding the Executive Director's contract or continued tenure?

  • Renew without conditions
  • Renew with a formal development plan
  • Extend probation / revisit in 6 months
  • Do not renew
  • I don't have enough information to recommend
Q08
장문형

What should the Executive Director start doing, stop doing, and continue doing to be more effective in the next year? Please be as specific as possible.

Q09
AI 인터뷰필수

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall effectiveness rating and contract recommendation: ask for a specific recent example that anchors their score, what the Executive Director could have done differently in that situation, and how the board could better support them. If the respondent indicated a decline in performance or recommended anything short of unconditional renewal, dig into what changed, when it started, and whether it's an isolated incident or a pattern. If they say they don't have enough information, ask what would help them assess the Executive Director's performance better next cycle.

Q10
객관식

How long have you served on the board?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-6 years
  • 7+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role on the board?

  • Board chair
  • Committee chair
  • Board officer (e.g., treasurer, secretary)
  • General board member
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for your thoughtful feedback. The board chair will compile all responses into a confidential summary used to guide the Executive Director's development plan and the board's own governance practices.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes multi-area rating batteries (slider matrix and agreement matrix) covering leadership, financial stewardship, fundraising, staff culture, and governance partnership in one instrument
  • Adds a max-diff prioritization exercise so the board can rank which focus areas matter most, not just rate them in isolation
  • Uses an AI follow-up interview to probe the reasoning behind the overall effectiveness rating and contract recommendation, surfacing context static forms can't capture
  • Closes with a long-text start/stop/continue prompt plus board-role and tenure questions, so qualitative feedback and respondent context are captured alongside the scores

Jotform

Executive Director Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form builder template for evaluating an Executive Director, benefiting from Jotform's drag-and-drop form editor and integrations. It's a static questionnaire rather than an interactive interview, so all follow-up on ambiguous or noteworthy answers would need to happen manually. Good for quick deployment but limited for probing the 'why' behind ratings.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize within Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Likely supports common field types (rating scales, text, multiple choice) out of the box
  • Can integrate with Jotform's broader ecosystem (e-signatures, notifications, storage)

아쉬운 점

  • Static form with no adaptive follow-up questioning based on individual responses
  • No built-in per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, published methodology for how questions were designed or how prompts work

SurveySparrow

Executive Director Evaluation Form Template

A conversational-style survey template for ED evaluation, leveraging SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel more engaging than a traditional grid. It remains a fixed-question survey, however, with no mechanism to dynamically dig deeper into a respondent's stated rationale. Best suited for organizations wanting a friendlier front-end than a raw form.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface can improve completion rates
  • Supports typical rating and open-text question types
  • Part of a broader survey platform with reporting dashboards

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interviewing to follow up on individual answers in real time
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No published, transparent prompt methodology behind question generation

Typeform

Executive Director Evaluation Form

A polished, conversational form template from Typeform aimed at ED performance reviews, known for its clean design and one-question-per-screen flow. Like other form builders, it presents a fixed question set to every respondent regardless of their answers. It's a solid template for gathering structured feedback but not built for open-ended, adaptive follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Visually appealing, well-known conversational form format
  • Simple to customize question wording and branding
  • Good mobile completion experience

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up interviewing—every respondent sees the same static question set
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No guided screen-share tasks or voice interview option

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.