Game Day Watch Party Guest Preference Survey
Helps hosts plan a game day watch party guests will actually love — covering food, activities, budget trade-offs, and timing. An AI follow-up interview digs into what made past game day parties memorable (or forgettable) so the host can prioritize the details that matter most, not just the ones that are easiest to plan.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Thinking back on game day parties you've been to before, what was your favorite part?
- The food and snacks
- The game itself
- Halftime games or contests
- Socializing with friends
- Prize contests or side bets
- Something else
Which foods would you be excited to see at the party?
- Wings
- Chili
- Nachos/dips
- Grilled food (burgers, hot dogs)
- Vegetarian or vegan options
- Desserts
- Finger foods/snack mixes
Any dietary restrictions or allergies we should plan the menu around?
If we had 100 points to spend on the party, how would you split them across these areas? (Your split doesn't have to match the actual budget — it just tells us what matters to you.)
- Food & drinks
- TV/viewing setup
- Decorations
- Games & activities/prizes
- Comfortable seating
How important is each of these to your enjoyment of the party?
- Food quality and variety
- Comfortable seating and screen view
- Halftime games or contests
- Music/atmosphere between plays
- Prize incentives or side bets
Rank these game day activities by how much you'd enjoy them, from most to least.
- Prediction/squares pool
- Trivia about the teams or players
- Commercial or halftime-show bracket voting
- Costume or jersey contest
- Just watching the game together, no extras
How likely are you to stay for the entire game, including overtime or a postgame hangout?
When would you prefer the party to start?
- Right before kickoff (Replace with actual kickoff time)
- About an hour early for pregame hangout
- Earlier in the day, with lunch or brunch
- I'm flexible, whatever works for the group
Probe the 'why' behind what this respondent rated as most important (food, seating, activities, or prizes) — ask them to describe a specific past game day party that nailed or botched that exact thing, and what the host did differently. If they ranked 'just watching the game, no extras' highest in the activities question, explore whether that reflects genuine preference or past frustration with forced games, and what would change their mind.
Which age range are you in?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
How would you describe your connection to the host or group?
- Close friend
- Family member
- Neighbor
- Coworker
- Other
- Prefer not to say
That's everything — thanks so much! Your answers go straight into the party plan, so expect a menu and schedule that actually matches what you're hoping for.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a constant-sum budget trade-off question (splitting 100 points across food, activities, etc.) so hosts see real priorities, not just wishlist answers
- Uses an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes the 'why' behind whatever the respondent rated as most important (food, seating, atmosphere), surfacing details a static form would miss
- Pairs a matrix importance rating and activity ranking with dietary restriction free-text so hosts can plan a menu and lineup that fits real guest constraints
- Asks about past game day parties' most memorable (or forgettable) moments, giving hosts qualitative context standard checkbox surveys don't capture
SurveyMonkey
Big Game Party Planning SurveyThis is a directly comparable, fielding-ready template aimed at the same big-game watch party use case. It likely covers standard logistics questions like food and viewing preferences, but as a static template it can't adapt follow-up questions based on individual answers. No pricing tier for academic use is offered on SurveyMonkey's platform either.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the same big-game/watch-party occasion as our template
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and distribution tools
- Likely quick to deploy for hosts wanting a simple, no-setup checklist-style survey
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a respondent rated something important
- No per-response quality scoring or automated report generation described on the page
- No transparent, published interview prompts or methodology for how questions were designed
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.