QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Conference & Webinar Presenter Feedback Survey

Captures how attendees rate a specific speaker or session — clarity, pacing, expertise, and Q&A handling — plus an AI follow-up that digs into the moment that most shaped their opinion. Built for event organizers, training teams, and internal speaker programs who need actionable feedback beyond a star rating.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for attending! We'd love your honest feedback on the presenter and session you just saw — it helps us book great speakers and help them improve. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 7 minutes.

Q02
단문형필수

Which session and presenter are you giving feedback on? (Replace with your event's actual session/speaker list, or convert this to a dropdown. Template note: replace with your own session name before launching.)

Q03
객관식

How did you attend this session?

  • In person
  • Virtual / livestream
  • Recorded or on-demand
Q04
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate this presentation?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Poor presentation최대:Outstanding presentation
Q05
매트릭스필수

Rate the presenter on each of the following:

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Clarity of explanations
  • Pace of delivery
  • Depth of subject knowledge
  • Engagement with the audience
  • Quality of slides or visual aids
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q06
객관식

Compared to what you expected going in, how did the content land?

  • Exceeded my expectations
  • Met my expectations
  • Fell short of my expectations
  • I wasn't sure what to expect
Q07
평점 척도

How well did the presenter handle audience questions?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Handled poorly최대:Handled excellently
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this presenter to a colleague for a future event?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct the specific moment in the session that most shaped this attendee's rating — a slide, an answer to a question, a story, or a stretch that lost their attention. Anchor on their overall rating and recommendation score: if either was low, probe exactly what broke down and whether it was the content, the delivery, or the format; if both were high, probe what specifically they'd want the presenter to keep doing. If they mention the Q&A, ask for the actual question and answer exchanged.

Q10
장문형

What's one thing this presenter could do differently to make the session more valuable next time?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role?

  • Individual contributor
  • People manager
  • Senior leader / executive
  • Student / academic
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you! Your feedback goes directly to the presenter and our events team to shape future sessions.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond star ratings with a matrix rating block covering clarity, pacing, expertise, and other presenter dimensions in one structured question.
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment that most shaped an attendee's opinion — something no static form field can do.
  • Captures context (attendance mode, expectations vs. reality, role) so organizers can segment feedback, not just average it.
  • Ends with an open-ended improvement question and a clear hand-off message, so the presenter gets direct, actionable takeaways alongside the auto-generated report.

Jotform

Presenter Feedback Survey Form Template

A ready-to-use, customizable form template built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, with the usual Jotform integrations and styling options. It's a static question set focused on basic presenter ratings rather than deeper follow-up on attendee experience.

잘하는 점

  • Easy to customize and embed via Jotform's widely-used form builder
  • Fielding-ready out of the box with no setup needed

아쉬운 점

  • Static form with fixed questions — no adaptive follow-up based on an individual's answers
  • No mechanism to probe the specific moment that shaped an attendee's rating
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report

SurveySparrow

Presenter Feedback Form

A conversational-style form template that presents questions one at a time for a more engaging feel than a traditional grid form. The flow is still pre-scripted, so every respondent sees the same fixed question path regardless of their answers.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, one-question-at-a-time interface that can feel less like a form
  • Ready-to-deploy template for quick fielding

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI probing — logic branches are pre-set, not generated from the response content
  • No voice AI interview option or screen-share guided tasks
  • No transparent, published prompt methodology behind the question flow

QuestionPro

Conference Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is primarily a question-bank/guide page listing sample conference evaluation questions rather than a single fielding-ready template — useful as a reference for writing your own survey. It covers general conference evaluation, not a focused single-presenter feedback flow.

잘하는 점

  • Broad library of sample questions covering multiple aspects of a conference
  • Backed by QuestionPro's established survey platform for building out a full survey

아쉬운 점

  • Guide/sample-question format rather than a plug-and-play, ready-to-send template
  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into what shaped an attendee's opinion
  • No automated per-response scoring or auto-generated report

Typeform

Free Webinar Feedback Form Template

A polished, conversational webinar feedback template with Typeform's signature clean single-question screens. It's built for general webinar feedback rather than presenter-specific evaluation, and the logic is limited to standard branching rather than dynamic follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Clean, mobile-friendly conversational design
  • Simple logic jumps for basic branching based on answers

아쉬운 점

  • General webinar-feedback focus rather than session/presenter-specific evaluation (clarity, pacing, Q&A handling)
  • No adaptive AI or voice interview follow-up to dig into a respondent's key moment
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated report on responses

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기