Content Moderation Appeals Experience Survey
Measures user perceptions of clarity, fairness, timeliness, and satisfaction with social media content moderation appeal processes. Designed for platform trust & safety teams seeking actionable feedback from users who have encountered moderation decisions.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which of the following best describes your experience with content moderation appeals in the past 12 months?
- Submitted 2 or more appeals
- Submitted 1 appeal
- Considered appealing but did not submit
- Received a moderation decision but did not consider appealing
- No moderation decisions about my content
- Not sure / Prefer not to say
The following questions ask about your experience in the past 12 months. If you submitted an appeal, please think about your most recent one.
What was the outcome of your most recent appeal?
- Original decision was upheld
- Decision was overturned in my favor
- Partial change (some elements adjusted)
- I withdrew or canceled the appeal
- No outcome yet
Overall, how satisfied are you with how the platform handles content moderation appeals?
Please rank the following aspects of an appeals process from most to least important to you.
- Clear reasons for decisions
- Fast review time
- Ability to add evidence
- Human reviewer involvement
- Status updates during review
- Detailed final explanation
If you could change one thing about the content moderation appeal experience, what would it be?
What is your age?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help improve the clarity and fairness of content moderation appeal processes. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.
Which type of social media platform are you mainly thinking about when answering this survey?
- General social network (e.g., Facebook)
- Photo-sharing platform (e.g., Instagram)
- Short-video platform (e.g., TikTok)
- Microblogging platform (e.g., X / Twitter)
- Discussion forum (e.g., Reddit)
- Streaming or creator platform (e.g., YouTube, Twitch)
- Messaging app (e.g., Telegram, Discord)
- Multiple platforms / varies
- Prefer not to say
Which steps of the appeal process were unclear or burdensome? Select all that apply.
- Finding where to submit an appeal
- Understanding the policy reason for the decision
- Writing the appeal message
- Providing or uploading evidence
- Submitting the appeal form
- Waiting for the review
- Tracking appeal status
- Receiving notifications or updates
- Understanding the final explanation
- None of the above
Approximately how long did it take to receive the outcome of your most recent appeal?
- Under 1 hour
- 1–24 hours
- 2–3 days
- 4–7 days
- 8–14 days
- 15–30 days
- More than 30 days
How satisfied are you with how clearly the platform communicates about moderation decisions and appeal outcomes?
Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your appeals experience in a bit more depth. Please share any additional thoughts, and our AI moderator may ask a few follow-up questions.
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the explanation of the policy your content was flagged for?
Thinking about your most recent appeal, how fair was the review process?
How likely are you to use the appeal process again if you receive a future moderation decision you disagree with?
If you selected 'Prefer to self-describe,' please share here (optional).
How clear were the instructions for submitting your appeal?
I believe the platform applied its policies consistently in my case.
In which region do you currently live?
- Africa
- Asia
- Europe
- North America
- Central America / Caribbean
- South America
- Oceania
- Prefer not to say
How clear were the status updates provided during the review of your appeal?
I felt my perspective was genuinely considered during the appeal review.
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or vocational training
- Bachelor's degree
- Master's degree
- Doctorate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the explanation of the final outcome of your appeal?
I trust that my appeal was reviewed by someone (or a process) that understood the context of my content.
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Student
- Homemaker / Caregiver
- Unemployed
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes multi-part clarity ratings (policy explanation, appeal instructions, status updates, final outcome) rather than a single generic clarity question
- Captures the actual appeal outcome and turnaround time via dedicated dropdowns, then pairs them with fairness, consistency, and trust items specific to that recent case
- Uses a ranking exercise to surface which appeals-process attributes (speed, fairness, clarity, etc.) matter most to users, plus an open-text question on the one thing they'd change
- Adds an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into each respondent's appeals experience based on their specific answers, something a static form cannot do
SurveyMonkey
Social Media Safety Survey Template & QuestionsThis is a fielding-ready template focused broadly on social media safety perceptions rather than the moderation-appeals journey specifically. It's the closest thematic match among available competitor pages, but it doesn't drill into appeal clarity, fairness, or timeliness the way a dedicated appeals survey would. Best viewed as an adjacent trust & safety template rather than a direct substitute.
잘하는 점
- Backed by an established survey platform with broad template libraries and easy deployment
- Likely includes built-in analytics/reporting dashboards for quick results review
- Positioned within a recognizable 'social media safety' category that trust & safety teams already search for
아쉬운 점
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual appeal experiences
- No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for richer qualitative detail
- No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology, and the template targets general safety perceptions rather than the specific appeal outcome/duration/fairness chain
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.