모든 템플릿

Content Moderation Appeals Experience Survey

Measures user perceptions of clarity, fairness, timeliness, and satisfaction with social media content moderation appeal processes. Designed for platform trust & safety teams seeking actionable feedback from users who have encountered moderation decisions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 28개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to this survey about content moderation appeals on social media platforms. This survey takes approximately 12 minutes. Your participation is entirely voluntary and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions and experiences. All responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only. No personally identifying information will be shared. By continuing, you consent to participate in this research.

Q02
객관식

Which of the following best describes your experience with content moderation appeals in the past 12 months?

  • Submitted 2 or more appeals
  • Submitted 1 appeal
  • Considered appealing but did not submit
  • Received a moderation decision but did not consider appealing
  • No moderation decisions about my content
  • Not sure / Prefer not to say
Q03
메시지

The following questions ask about your experience in the past 12 months. If you submitted an appeal, please think about your most recent one.

Q04
객관식

What was the outcome of your most recent appeal?

  • Original decision was upheld
  • Decision was overturned in my favor
  • Partial change (some elements adjusted)
  • I withdrew or canceled the appeal
  • No outcome yet
Q05
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with how the platform handles content moderation appeals?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q06
순위 매기기

Please rank the following aspects of an appeals process from most to least important to you.

  1. Clear reasons for decisions
  2. Fast review time
  3. Ability to add evidence
  4. Human reviewer involvement
  5. Status updates during review
  6. Detailed final explanation
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
장문형

If you could change one thing about the content moderation appeal experience, what would it be?

Q08
객관식

What is your age?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will help improve the clarity and fairness of content moderation appeal processes. Your responses are confidential and will be reported in aggregate only.

Q10
드롭다운

Which type of social media platform are you mainly thinking about when answering this survey?

  • General social network (e.g., Facebook)
  • Photo-sharing platform (e.g., Instagram)
  • Short-video platform (e.g., TikTok)
  • Microblogging platform (e.g., X / Twitter)
  • Discussion forum (e.g., Reddit)
  • Streaming or creator platform (e.g., YouTube, Twitch)
  • Messaging app (e.g., Telegram, Discord)
  • Multiple platforms / varies
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

Which steps of the appeal process were unclear or burdensome? Select all that apply.

  • Finding where to submit an appeal
  • Understanding the policy reason for the decision
  • Writing the appeal message
  • Providing or uploading evidence
  • Submitting the appeal form
  • Waiting for the review
  • Tracking appeal status
  • Receiving notifications or updates
  • Understanding the final explanation
  • None of the above
Q12
드롭다운

Approximately how long did it take to receive the outcome of your most recent appeal?

  • Under 1 hour
  • 1–24 hours
  • 2–3 days
  • 4–7 days
  • 8–14 days
  • 15–30 days
  • More than 30 days
Q13
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with how clearly the platform communicates about moderation decisions and appeal outcomes?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q14
AI 인터뷰

Based on your survey responses, we'd like to explore your appeals experience in a bit more depth. Please share any additional thoughts, and our AI moderator may ask a few follow-up questions.

Q15
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
의견 척도

How clear was the explanation of the policy your content was flagged for?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q17
의견 척도

Thinking about your most recent appeal, how fair was the review process?

척도: 15
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q18
의견 척도

How likely are you to use the appeal process again if you receive a future moderation decision you disagree with?

척도: 17
최소:Very unlikely최대:Very likely
Q19
장문형

If you selected 'Prefer to self-describe,' please share here (optional).

Q20
의견 척도

How clear were the instructions for submitting your appeal?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q21
의견 척도

I believe the platform applied its policies consistently in my case.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q22
드롭다운

In which region do you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • Central America / Caribbean
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say
Q23
의견 척도

How clear were the status updates provided during the review of your appeal?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q24
의견 척도

I felt my perspective was genuinely considered during the appeal review.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q25
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Less than high school
  • High school or equivalent
  • Some college or vocational training
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Master's degree
  • Doctorate or professional degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
의견 척도

How clear was the explanation of the final outcome of your appeal?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q27
의견 척도

I trust that my appeal was reviewed by someone (or a process) that understood the context of my content.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q28
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker / Caregiver
  • Unemployed
  • Retired
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes multi-part clarity ratings (policy explanation, appeal instructions, status updates, final outcome) rather than a single generic clarity question
  • Captures the actual appeal outcome and turnaround time via dedicated dropdowns, then pairs them with fairness, consistency, and trust items specific to that recent case
  • Uses a ranking exercise to surface which appeals-process attributes (speed, fairness, clarity, etc.) matter most to users, plus an open-text question on the one thing they'd change
  • Adds an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into each respondent's appeals experience based on their specific answers, something a static form cannot do

SurveyMonkey

Social Media Safety Survey Template & Questions

This is a fielding-ready template focused broadly on social media safety perceptions rather than the moderation-appeals journey specifically. It's the closest thematic match among available competitor pages, but it doesn't drill into appeal clarity, fairness, or timeliness the way a dedicated appeals survey would. Best viewed as an adjacent trust & safety template rather than a direct substitute.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by an established survey platform with broad template libraries and easy deployment
  • Likely includes built-in analytics/reporting dashboards for quick results review
  • Positioned within a recognizable 'social media safety' category that trust & safety teams already search for

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual appeal experiences
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option for richer qualitative detail
  • No visible per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology, and the template targets general safety perceptions rather than the specific appeal outcome/duration/fairness chain

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.