QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

System Usability Scale (SUS) with AI Debrief

The standard 10-item SUS questionnaire, scored 0–100 and benchmarkable against decades of published research — with correct alternating positive/negative wording preserved. An AI debrief interview follows the score, so you learn what to fix, not just where you stand.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

These are the 10 standard System Usability Scale statements — the most widely used usability questionnaire in the world. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Rate your agreement with each, thinking about the product you just used. Some statements are worded positively and some negatively on purpose; read each one carefully.

Q02
의견 척도필수

I think that I would like to use this system frequently.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q03
의견 척도필수

I found the system unnecessarily complex.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도필수

I thought the system was easy to use.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
의견 척도필수

I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q06
의견 척도필수

I found the various functions in this system were well integrated.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q07
의견 척도필수

I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q08
의견 척도필수

I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q09
의견 척도필수

I found the system very cumbersome to use.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q10
의견 척도필수

I felt very confident using the system.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q11
의견 척도필수

I needed to learn a lot of things before I could get going with this system.

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q12
AI 인터뷰

Debrief the SUS responses: ask which single moment in the product most shaped their ratings, what felt unnecessarily complex or inconsistent in concrete terms, and what they had to learn before becoming productive. If their ratings suggest high confidence, probe what almost went wrong anyway.

Q13
메시지

That completes the SUS. Your ratings convert to the standard 0–100 score you can benchmark against published norms — and the debrief tells us what to actually change.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • The complete validated 10-item SUS battery with the correct alternating positive/negative wording — benchmarkable against published norms (68 is average)
  • An AI debrief follows the score, converting 'usability is 62' into the specific moments that dragged it down
  • Transparent prompts and logged parameters make results defensible in research reports

Maze

System Usability Scale (SUS) Template

A ready-to-field SUS template with all 10 standardized statements on a 1-5 agree/disagree scale, welcome and thank-you screens, and a prototype-testing path. It includes benchmark guidance (68 average, 80+ great) and best-practice tips like testing with five or more users early, making it immediately usable, though it does not layer any qualitative why behind the scores.

잘하는 점

  • All 10 standardized SUS statements prebuilt on a 1-5 strongly-disagree to strongly-agree scale
  • Provides interpretation benchmarks (68 = average, 80+ = great) so a raw score is meaningful
  • Complete flow with welcome screen, thank-you screen, and a prototype-testing path
  • Actionable methodology tips: test five or more users, run it early, keep wording clear

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up asking why a user disagreed with a statement, so low scores lack diagnostic context
  • No voice-interview option to capture usability frustrations in the participant's own words
  • Score is reported against a benchmark but not turned into a written narrative of what to fix
  • The fixed 10-item instrument does not adapt probes to the specific product being tested

QuestionPro

System Usability Scale Survey Template

QuestionPro's SUS template lists all 10 questions on a 5-point Likert scale and lets researchers amend wording as needed. It is a faithful, editable rendering of the instrument, but the page provides the standard 10 items without the SUS scoring formula or benchmark interpretation, leaving score calculation to the researcher.

잘하는 점

  • Presents the full 10-question SUS instrument with the standard alternating positive/negative wording
  • Uses the canonical 5-point strongly-agree to strongly-disagree Likert scale
  • Explicitly editable so researchers can adapt items to their system
  • Framed correctly as a quantitative, subjective usability measure

아쉬운 점

  • No SUS scoring formula or benchmark interpretation shown, so users must compute and interpret scores themselves
  • No adaptive AI follow-up on any low-scoring statement to explain the underlying issue
  • No voice administration of the questionnaire
  • No auto-generated report converting responses into a usability verdict or action list

Typeform

System Usability Survey Template

Typeform's SUS questionnaire in their signature one-question-at-a-time format. Pleasant to take and quick to deploy; scoring and interpretation against SUS norms are left to you, and there is no debrief on what drove the ratings.

잘하는 점

  • Standard SUS battery in a polished, high-completion conversational UI
  • Fast setup with Typeform's design and logic tools
  • 300+ integrations for piping results into analysis tools

아쉬운 점

  • No automatic SUS scoring or benchmark interpretation documented on the template page
  • No adaptive debrief converting the score into specific usability fixes
  • No transparent methodology logging for research reporting

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기