Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Nonprofit Mentoring Program Relationship & Impact Survey
Measures how mentees experience match quality, meeting consistency, and goal progress in a nonprofit mentoring program, with an AI follow-up that digs into why relationships work or stall so program staff can improve matching and support rather than just tallying satisfaction scores.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
How long have you been matched with your current mentor?
- Less than 1 month
- 1-3 months
- 4-6 months
- 7-12 months
- More than a year
Q03
의견 척도필수
How well matched do you feel with your mentor in terms of interests, goals, and personality?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not well matched at all최대:Extremely well matched
Q04
객관식필수
In the last month, how often did you meet or talk with your mentor (in person, by phone, or video)?
- Not at all
- Once
- 2-3 times
- Weekly
- More than once a week
Q05
매트릭스필수
How much do you agree with each statement about your mentoring relationship?
5개 행 × 5개 열
- My mentor listens to me and understands my situation
- My mentor helps me set clear, specific goals
- I feel comfortable sharing challenges or setbacks with my mentor
- My mentor follows through on things they say they'll do
- This relationship is helping me make real progress
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q06
평점 척도필수
Overall, how satisfied are you with your experience in this mentoring program so far?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which types of support matter most to you in this mentoring relationship? Choose the most and least valuable each round.
- Career guidance
- Emotional support and encouragement
- Skill-building (e.g., resume, interview prep)
- Networking and introductions
- Goal-setting and accountability
- Access to resources and information
- Help navigating challenges outside the program
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable최악:Least valuable
Q08
의견 척도필수
How likely are you to recommend this mentoring program to a friend or colleague who could benefit from it?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Explore the story behind this person's match-quality and satisfaction ratings. If ratings were high, find out specifically what the mentor does or the program set up that makes it work, and whether it's the match, the structure, or both. If ratings were mediocre or low, probe concretely: what's missing from meetings, what goals feel stuck, and whether the issue is the specific mentor match or the program's structure and communication. Ask for one specific recent interaction that illustrates their experience.
Q10
장문형
What's one change that would make this mentoring program more valuable for you?
Q11
객관식
What is your age range?
- Under 18
- 18-24
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
How do you describe your gender?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Self-describe
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That's everything — thank you for sharing your experience! Your answers will be reviewed by program staff to improve mentor matching and support, and will never be shared with your mentor directly.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond a static satisfaction score with an AI follow-up interview that explores the story behind each mentee's match-quality and satisfaction ratings, surfacing why relationships work or stall.
- Combines structured measurement (opinion scales on match quality and likelihood to recommend, a matrix of relationship-agreement statements, and a MaxDiff prioritization of support types) with open-ended long-text feedback for richer, mixed-method data.
- Captures meeting frequency, match duration, and satisfaction alongside light demographic segmentation (age range, gender) so program staff can spot patterns in who thrives and who doesn't.
- Produces an auto-generated report from the full response set, including the qualitative follow-up, so staff get actionable insight without manually reading and coding every transcript.
QuestionPro
Non Profit Mentoring Programs Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateA directly comparable nonprofit mentoring survey template with sample questions covering match quality and program experience. It reads as a static questionnaire reference rather than a fielding-ready adaptive interview, aimed at giving programs a starting question set to copy or adapt. Good topical fit but limited to fixed-question data collection.
잘하는 점
- Purpose-built for the nonprofit mentoring context, not a generic form
- Comes with sample questions that can be used as a quick starting questionnaire
- Backed by an established, broad survey platform
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a mentee rated match quality or satisfaction the way they did
- No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated qualitative report
Jotform
Mentoring Program Survey Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable form-builder template for collecting mentoring program feedback, well suited to quick deployment and embedding. It's a static form rather than an interview experience, so it's easy to launch but limited in how deeply it can explore a respondent's answers. Best fit for teams wanting a simple, editable form over rich qualitative insight.
잘하는 점
- Drag-and-drop customization and easy embedding typical of Jotform's form builder
- Fast to launch with minimal setup
- Flexible field types for basic mentoring feedback collection
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questions — every respondent sees the same fixed fields
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
- No AI-generated report synthesizing open-ended feedback
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.