QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Security Awareness and Phishing Behavior Survey

Measures how well employees recognize threats, follow security policy, and actually behave when something looks suspicious — not just what training they sat through. An AI follow-up interview digs into a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt to surface the gaps that policy audits miss.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes on this. We're checking how security training actually shows up in day-to-day decisions — there are no wrong answers, and this isn't tied to any individual review. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. About 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

In the last 12 months, which security awareness training have you completed?

  • General security awareness course
  • Phishing simulation exercise
  • Data handling / privacy training
  • Remote work security training
  • None that I can recall
Q03
의견 척도필수

How confident are you that you could correctly identify a phishing email if one landed in your inbox today?

척도: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often have you encountered an email, text, or message that seemed suspicious?

  • Never
  • Once
  • A few times
  • Weekly or more often
Q05
객관식필수

Thinking about the most recent suspicious message you saw, what did you actually do?

  • Reported it through the official channel
  • Deleted or ignored it without reporting
  • Clicked a link or opened an attachment before realizing
  • Forwarded it to a coworker to check
  • Wasn't sure what to do, so did nothing
Q06
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about security at your organization?

4개 행 × 5개 열
  • I know exactly how to report a suspected phishing attempt
  • I would feel comfortable reporting a mistake I made without fear of punishment
  • Our security policies are written in a way I can actually understand
  • My manager visibly follows good security practices
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

Which of these security topics would be most and least valuable to cover in future training?

  • Spotting phishing emails and texts
  • Creating and managing strong passwords
  • Securing home and remote work networks
  • Recognizing phone-based social engineering
  • Physical security (badges, tailgating, visitors)
  • Handling sensitive customer or company data
  • Safe use of cloud storage and file sharing
  • Mobile device and app security
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most valuable최악:Least valuable
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Ask the respondent to walk through the last time they felt even briefly unsure about a message, link, or request — what made it feel off, what they actually did in the moment, and whether they told anyone. If they say they'd always report something, probe for a specific counterexample or reason reporting felt awkward, slow, or pointless. If they can't recall any suspicious moment, ask what would make them notice one.

Q09
객관식필수

If you suspected your account had been compromised right now, would you know exactly who to contact?

  • Yes, I know exactly who
  • I have a rough idea
  • No, I would have to search for it
Q10
평점 척도

How would you rate the format and length of the security training you've received?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q11
객관식

Which best describes your department?

  • Engineering / IT
  • Sales / Marketing
  • Finance / Legal
  • Operations / HR
  • Customer Support
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How long have you been with the organization?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6 months to 2 years
  • 2 to 5 years
  • More than 5 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

That's everything — thank you. Your answers, along with everyone else's, will be used to shape more relevant, less generic security training and to fix any gaps in how easy it is to report concerns.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to walk through a real recent moment of hesitation or doubt, surfacing behavioral gaps that policy audits and static forms miss
  • Combines standard awareness questions (training completed, confidence identifying phishing, incident response know-how) with a matrix on agreement about security culture and a max-diff prioritization of future training topics
  • Asks what respondents actually did the last time they saw a suspicious message, not just what they were trained on, distinguishing stated policy knowledge from real behavior
  • Closes with a transparent chat-based explanation of how responses will be used, and produces an auto-generated report for HR/security teams without manual tallying

Jotform

Security Awareness Survey Form Template

A fielding-ready static form template covering general security awareness questions, easily customizable within Jotform's form builder. It relies on fixed multiple-choice and rating items rather than any adaptive follow-up. Good for quick deployment but not built to probe individual incidents in depth.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use, fully customizable form builder
  • Simple to deploy and embed across channels
  • Part of a broad, well-known survey/form ecosystem

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up to dig into a specific hesitation or incident
  • No automated per-response quality scoring
  • No documented methodology or transparent prompt logic

SurveyMonkey

Security Awareness Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready template of fixed questions on security training and awareness, benefiting from SurveyMonkey's mature survey infrastructure and analytics dashboard. It captures self-reported knowledge and attitudes but not real-time behavioral detail. There is no mechanism to explore a specific recent suspicious-message experience beyond a checkbox answer.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking tools
  • Easy to launch, distribute, and track responses
  • Familiar respondent experience

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to explore a specific moment of doubt
  • No voice-based interview option
  • No transparent, per-question methodology disclosure

SurveySparrow

Information Security Risk Assessment Questionnaire

This is framed more broadly as an organizational risk-assessment questionnaire rather than an employee-behavior/phishing-specific survey, so it's a partial match. It's a fielding-ready static template with SurveySparrow's conversational UI, but questions are fixed rather than adaptive. Best suited to compliance-style risk scoring rather than uncovering individual behavioral gaps.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey UI improves completion rates
  • Positioned for broader risk-assessment/compliance use cases
  • Supports standard question branching logic

아쉬운 점

  • No AI-driven follow-up interview to probe a specific recent incident
  • No automated quality scoring of open-ended responses
  • Static questionnaire structure, not adaptive to individual answers

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기