Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
New Hire Staff Request Intake Survey
Captures the business case, urgency, and role requirements behind a hiring manager's request for a new staff position, so HR can prioritize openings and staff the recruiting pipeline correctly. An AI follow-up interview digs into what happens if the role stays unfilled and where trade-offs on candidate qualifications are acceptable.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
단문형필수
Which department or team is this request for?
Q03
단문형필수
What is the working job title for this role?
Q04
객관식필수
What is driving this request?
- Replacing a departing employee
- Backfilling an already-open role
- New headcount for team growth
- Temporary or seasonal coverage
- Other
Q05
객관식필수
What employment type is this?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Contract or temporary
- Internship
Q06
객관식필수
Where will this person primarily work?
- Onsite
- Hybrid
- Fully remote
Q07
장문형필수
Describe the primary responsibilities of this role and the business justification for filling it now.
Q08
의견 척도필수
How urgent is filling this role?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Can wait several months최대:Business-critical, need immediately
Q09
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
When comparing candidates for this role, which qualifications matter most and least?
- Technical/functional expertise
- Relevant industry experience
- Leadership or people-management ability
- Communication and stakeholder skills
- Cultural and team fit
- Ability to start immediately
- Professional certifications or licenses
- Bilingual or multilingual ability
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to this role최악:Least important to this role
Q10
날짜
What is the target start date for this hire?
Q11
평점 척도필수
If this role stays unfilled for another quarter, how much would it impact your team's ability to deliver?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:No real impact최대:Severe impact, work stalls
Q12
AI 인터뷰
Probe the concrete business consequences of leaving this role unfilled past the target start date — what specifically slips, breaks, or falls on other people. Ask which candidate qualifications the manager would trade off (e.g. accept less experience for faster start, or remote-only over onsite) if the ideal candidate doesn't surface quickly, and anchor on the reason given for the request to check whether urgency and impact actually line up.
Q13
메시지
Thanks for the details! HR will use this to prioritize and staff the search — you'll hear from your recruiting partner about next steps.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes a dedicated AI follow-up interview that probes the concrete business consequences of leaving the role unfilled, beyond what a static form field can capture
- Pairs a rating question on quarterly impact with an urgency scale and a max-diff exercise on candidate qualification trade-offs, giving HR structured prioritization signal rather than free-text guesses
- Captures department, job title, employment type, work location, target start date, and business justification in one intake flow, so recruiting can act without a follow-up email chain
- Uses transparent, auto-scored responses and an auto-generated report, so HR sees quality-flagged submissions instead of manually reading every long-text justification
SurveySparrow
New Hire Staff Request Form TemplateA fielding-ready form template covering the basics of a new hire request. It's built on SurveySparrow's conversational form format, which is friendlier than a flat form but still follows a fixed script. No mechanism to dynamically dig into urgency or trade-offs based on what the hiring manager types.
잘하는 점
- Conversational one-question-at-a-time format for better completion rates
- Purpose-built specifically for staff request intake
- Part of a broader employee/HR template library
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe unfilled-role impact or acceptable trade-offs
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or prioritized
- Likely lacks a structured max-diff style comparison for candidate qualification trade-offs
Jotform
Staff Request Form TemplateA generic staff request form rather than one tailored to the nuances of urgency and qualification trade-offs. Jotform's strength is easy customization and integrations, but the template itself is a static field-collection form. Good for basic intake logging, not for interrogating the business case behind a request.
잘하는 점
- Highly customizable form builder with drag-and-drop fields
- Broad integration ecosystem (e-signature, payment, notifications)
- Easy to adapt field labels for different departments
아쉬운 점
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI interview to follow up on ambiguous or high-urgency answers
- No built-in quality scoring of open-ended justification responses
- No structured trade-off elicitation (e.g., which qualifications matter most vs. least)
Typeform
Request for Hire FormA clean, conversational request-for-hire form in Typeform's signature style, good for capturing basic role and justification details. It's a fixed-question template, not an interview, so it can't adapt based on how a hiring manager answers. Best suited for simple intake logging rather than deeper prioritization analysis.
잘하는 점
- Polished, conversational UI known for high completion rates
- Simple to embed and share across HR workflows
- Logic jumps can branch based on multiple-choice answers
아쉬운 점
- Branching logic is rule-based, not an AI-driven follow-up interview that probes unfilled-role consequences
- No automated quality scoring of responses or auto-generated prioritization report
- No structured method for ranking candidate qualification trade-offs
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.