QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Team & Group Project Performance Evaluation

Captures how a group or team performed on a shared project — coordination, workload fairness, communication, and overall output quality — for managers, educators, or project leads reviewing team dynamics after a collaboration ends. The AI follow-up interview digs into the specific moment or decision that most helped or hurt the group's performance, going beyond generic ratings.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to reflect on your recent group project or team collaboration. Your honest input helps improve how teams are formed and supported going forward. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
단문형필수

Which group, team, or project are you evaluating? (Replace with your specific team/project name if this is being sent for a single group.)

Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how well did this group achieve the goals it set out to accomplish?

척도: 1 – 10
최소:Did not achieve goals최대:Fully achieved goals
Q04
매트릭스필수

Rate the group on each of the following aspects of how it worked together.

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Communication among members
  • Coordination and planning
  • Handling of disagreements or conflict
  • Quality of the final output
  • Meeting deadlines
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
객관식필수

How was the workload distributed among group members?

  • Very unevenly - a few people did most of the work
  • Somewhat unevenly
  • Fairly evenly
  • Very evenly - everyone contributed similarly
Q06
순위 매기기필수

Rank the following factors by how much they affected this group's performance, from biggest impact to smallest.

  1. Clarity of roles and responsibilities
  2. Quality of communication
  3. Leadership within the group
  4. Skills and experience of members
  5. Time and resources available
  6. Personal motivation of members
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these teamwork behaviors mattered most, and which mattered least, to how well this group performed?

  • Clear roles from the start
  • Timely, responsive communication
  • Mutual respect between members
  • Equal effort from everyone
  • Constructive conflict resolution
  • Shared decision-making
  • Accountability for missed commitments
  • Flexibility when plans changed
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Mattered most최악:Mattered least
Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely would you be to want to work with this same group again on a future project?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Probe the specific incident or decision that most shaped this respondent's rating of the group's performance — anchor on the lowest-rated item from the teamwork matrix (communication, coordination, conflict, output quality, or deadlines) and ask for a concrete example of what happened. If they flagged uneven workload, ask who they felt over- or under-contributed and what could have rebalanced it. If ratings were uniformly high, ask what specific practice the group should keep doing on its next project.

Q10
장문형

Is there anything else about how this group worked together that these questions didn't capture?

Q11
객관식

What was your role in this group?

  • Group lead / coordinator
  • Regular member/contributor
  • Supporting or advisory role
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

How large was this group?

  • 2-3 people
  • 4-6 people
  • 7-10 people
  • More than 10 people
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for sharing your perspective! Responses across the group will be combined into a summary report used to improve how future teams are set up and supported — individual answers are not shared with teammates.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific incident or decision that most shaped a respondent's scores, rather than stopping at a number.
  • Combines structured measurement (opinion scales on goal achievement, a matrix rating teamwork dimensions, ranking and max-diff on performance factors) with open reflection, giving both quantifiable and narrative data.
  • Captures context that matters for interpreting results — workload distribution, role in the group, and group size — so managers or educators can segment findings accurately.
  • Automatically compiles individual responses into a report, saving the manual synthesis work required after fielding a static form.

Jotform

Group Evaluation Form Template

A ready-to-use static form template for rating group work, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. It's easy to customize fields and branding, but it is a fixed-question form rather than an interview experience. Good for quick, low-cost data collection without deeper follow-up.

잘하는 점

  • Fast to customize and deploy via drag-and-drop builder
  • Part of a large existing template library for quick starting points
  • Familiar, simple form format for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive follow-up questioning — every respondent sees the same fixed items
  • No AI or voice interview capability to probe specific incidents
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report

Typeform

Group Evaluation Form Template

Typeform's conversational one-question-at-a-time format makes filling out a group evaluation feel more engaging than a traditional form. It still relies on pre-set static questions, so any deeper context has to come from open-text fields read manually. Best suited for a pleasant respondent experience rather than adaptive probing.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational UI that can improve completion rates
  • Simple sharing and embedding
  • Clean visual design out of the box

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up — the flow is scripted regardless of answers given
  • No voice interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No automated scoring or report generation; results still need manual interpretation

QuestionPro

Performance Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

This is a general performance evaluation questionnaire and question-bank resource rather than a template built specifically for team/group project reviews. It offers enterprise survey features and analytics dashboards, but the sample questions are broad and would need significant editing for team-collaboration context. Reads more like a guide with sample items than a fielding-ready group project template.

잘하는 점

  • Enterprise-grade survey platform with analytics dashboards
  • Large bank of sample performance-review questions to draw from
  • Established platform with broad survey logic and reporting features

아쉬운 점

  • Not purpose-built for team/group project dynamics — questions are generic performance-review items needing rework
  • No adaptive AI or voice interview to dig into specific team incidents
  • No transparent, published interview-prompt methodology or automated quality scoring per response

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기