Public Records (FOIA) Request Satisfaction Survey
Measures resident satisfaction with public records/FOIA request processes—covering clarity of guidance, response timelines, fee transparency, and overall ease—to help government agencies and civic organizations identify actionable improvement priorities.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Have you submitted a public records (FOIA) request in the last 12 months?
- Yes
- No
- Not sure
How clear was the information about how to submit a public records request?
Approximately how many calendar days passed between submitting your request and receiving the initial response?
- 1–5 days
- 6–10 days
- 11–20 days
- 21–30 days
- More than 30 days
- I have not yet received a response
- Don't remember
Which types of fees, if any, did you encounter? Select all that apply.
- Per-page copying
- Electronic processing
- Hourly labor
- Mailing or shipping
- Certification or notarization
- I did not incur any fees
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how easy or difficult was the public records request process in your jurisdiction?
What is your age group?
- 18–24
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey! Your input will help improve the clarity, timelines, and costs of public records request processes. Your responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.
How did you submit your most recent public records request?
- Online portal
- In person
- Fax
- Other (please specify)
How clear was the information about what records are available for request?
How clear was the communication about the expected timeline for your request?
Approximately how much did you pay in total fees for your most recent public records request?
- $0 (no fees)
- $1–$10
- $11–$25
- $26–$50
- $51–$100
- More than $100
- Don't remember
Overall, how satisfied are you with the public records request process in your jurisdiction?
Which best describes your gender?
- Man
- Woman
- Non-binary
- Self-describe (please specify)
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the information about the fee structure and estimated costs?
Which of the following would be most helpful for tracking the status of a public records request? Select up to 3.
- Email updates
- Online portal status page
- Phone support
- Text/SMS alerts
- Assigned contact person
- Other (please specify)
Overall, how reasonable were the fees you paid for your public records request?
How likely are you to file a public records request in the next 12 months?
What is the highest level of education you have completed?
- Less than high school
- High school or equivalent
- Some college or associate degree
- Bachelor's degree
- Graduate or professional degree
- Prefer not to say
How clear was the information about exemptions and reasons records might be denied or redacted?
Did the costs associated with your request lead you to change your plans?
- No, costs did not affect my request
- Yes, I narrowed the scope of my request
- Yes, I canceled my request entirely
- Not applicable—I did not incur fees
If you could change one thing to improve the public records request process (clarity, timelines, or costs), what would it be?
What is your current employment status?
- Employed full-time
- Employed part-time
- Self-employed
- Unemployed, seeking work
- Not working by choice (student, caregiver, etc.)
- Retired
- Prefer not to say
How satisfied were you with any explanations provided for denials or redactions in your request?
Based on your responses in this survey, is there anything else you would like to share about your experience with public records (FOIA) requests?
Which U.S. state or territory do you live in?
- Alabama
- Alaska
- Arizona
- Arkansas
- California
- Colorado
- Connecticut
- Delaware
- District of Columbia
- Florida
- Georgia
- Hawaii
- Idaho
- Illinois
- Indiana
- Iowa
- Kansas
- Kentucky
- Louisiana
- Maine
- Maryland
- Massachusetts
- Michigan
- Minnesota
- Mississippi
- Missouri
- Montana
- Nebraska
- Nevada
- New Hampshire
- New Jersey
- New Mexico
- New York
- North Carolina
- North Dakota
- Ohio
- Oklahoma
- Oregon
- Pennsylvania
- Rhode Island
- South Carolina
- South Dakota
- Tennessee
- Texas
- Utah
- Vermont
- Virginia
- Washington
- West Virginia
- Wisconsin
- Wyoming
- American Samoa
- Guam
- Northern Mariana Islands
- Puerto Rico
- U.S. Virgin Islands
- Other U.S. territory
- Prefer not to say
We'd like to learn more about your experience with public records requests. An AI moderator will ask a couple of brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes dedicated opinion-scale questions on clarity of submission guidance, records availability, fee structure, and exemption/denial explanations—not just generic satisfaction
- Captures the full request lifecycle: submission channel, elapsed calendar days, timeline communication clarity, fees encountered, and whether costs changed the requester's plans
- Adds an AI follow-up interview to probe open-ended feedback beyond the two open-text questions, surfacing specifics that fixed-choice scales miss
- Ends with demographic breakdowns (age, gender, education, employment, state) so agencies can segment satisfaction and identify equity gaps in access to records
SurveyMonkey
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateA general-purpose resident satisfaction template aimed at local government services broadly, not specifically at public records or FOIA request experiences. It would need substantial rewriting to cover fee transparency, exemption clarity, and request timelines. Useful as a generic starting point but not fielding-ready for FOIA-specific measurement.
잘하는 점
- Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics platform
- Likely easy to customize for broad municipal satisfaction topics
- Familiar interface for government staff already using SurveyMonkey
아쉬운 점
- No FOIA-specific questions on fee structure, exemptions, or request timelines out of the box
- Static question format with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a resident was dissatisfied
- No published methodology or per-response quality scoring for open-ended answers
SurveySparrow
Resident Satisfaction Survey TemplateAnother general resident satisfaction template covering local services broadly rather than the public records request process specifically. It lacks the granular fee, timeline, and denial-explanation questions needed to diagnose FOIA process friction. Would serve as a generic community feedback tool rather than a purpose-built FOIA satisfaction instrument.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style survey format that may improve completion rates
- Part of a broader community/civic template library
- Supports standard multiple-choice and rating question types
아쉬운 점
- No built-in questions addressing FOIA-specific pain points like fee transparency or exemption clarity
- No adaptive AI interviewing to dig deeper into low satisfaction scores
- No transparent, publishable prompt/methodology documentation for any AI-assisted elements
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.