Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Post-Viewing Property Evaluation Survey
Captures how a prospective buyer or renter evaluated a specific property right after a tour or showing — condition, price fairness, must-have features, and likelihood to move forward. An AI follow-up interview digs into the real reasons behind their interest level and any dealbreakers, giving agents and property managers insight closed-ended ratings alone can't provide.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
How did you view the property?
- In-person tour
- Live virtual tour
- Self-guided open house
- Recorded video walkthrough only
Q03
의견 척도필수
Overall, how would you rate the physical condition of the property?
척도: 1 – 5
최소:Poor condition최대:Excellent condition
Q04
매트릭스필수
Please rate the following aspects of the property.
6개 행 × 5개 열
- Layout & flow
- Natural light
- Kitchen & appliances
- Storage space
- Outdoor/yard space
- 외 1개
열: Poor · Below average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
의견 척도필수
Given the asking price (or rent), how would you rate the value of this property?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Overpriced최대:Excellent value
Q06
객관식필수
How likely are you to move forward (make an offer or apply) on this property?
- Definitely will not proceed
- Probably will not
- Undecided
- Probably will proceed
- Definitely will proceed
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)
When deciding on a property, which of these factors matter most to you?
- Location
- Asking price
- Size / square footage
- Overall condition
- Natural light
- Storage space
- Outdoor space
- School district / neighborhood reputation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most최악:Matters least
Q08
AI 인터뷰
Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's likelihood-to-proceed rating: what specifically drove that answer, and what would need to change to move them up or down a level. If they rated the property's value poorly, ask what price would feel fair. If they flagged low ratings on any single aspect in the matrix (light, storage, noise, etc.), ask whether that alone is a dealbreaker or just a minor concern. Anchor at least one question on the top factor they picked in the best-worst trade-off exercise.
Q09
단문형
Was there anything about the property that could be a dealbreaker (e.g., structural issues, odor, layout problems)? Describe briefly if so.
Q10
객관식
Compared with other properties you've viewed recently, how does this one rank overall?
- Best so far
- Above average
- About average
- Below average
- This is the only property I've viewed
Q11
객관식
Which best describes your current situation?
- First-time homebuyer
- Repeat homebuyer
- Renter looking to rent
- Property investor
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식
What is your age range?
- Under 25
- 25-34
- 35-44
- 45-54
- 55-64
- 65+
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That's everything — thank you for sharing your impressions! Your feedback goes directly to the agent/property team to improve how this and future properties are presented.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that probes the real reasoning behind a respondent's likelihood-to-proceed rating and surfaces dealbreakers in their own words
- Combines structured measurement (opinion scales on condition and value, a matrix on property aspects, and a MaxDiff on decision priorities) with open-ended context, giving agents both the 'what' and the 'why'
- Segments respondents by viewing method, current situation, and age range, plus a direct ranking against other properties viewed, so results can be sliced by buyer type
- Automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report mean property managers get clean, ready-to-use insight without manually reading every open-text answer
Jotform
Property Evaluation Form TemplateA fielding-ready static form builder template for capturing property evaluation feedback, with Jotform's typical drag-and-drop customization and integrations. It's built for form completion rather than conversational depth, so it captures ratings but not the reasoning behind them. No AI-driven follow-up or automated interview scoring is part of the offering.
잘하는 점
- Easy to customize and embed as a standard web form
- Likely integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (notifications, storage, PDF export)
- Simple, familiar form-fill experience for respondents
아쉬운 점
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe dealbreakers or reasoning
- No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated analysis report
- No transparent prompt methodology since there's no AI interviewing component
Typeform
Property Evaluation FormA conversational-style, fielding-ready template well-suited to a friendly post-viewing feedback flow, leveraging Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UX. It's still a fixed question set, so while the experience feels conversational, there's no actual adaptive branching based on respondent answers. Reporting is limited to Typeform's standard results dashboard rather than an AI-synthesized analysis.
잘하는 점
- Polished, mobile-friendly conversational question flow
- Good respondent experience and completion rates typical of Typeform forms
- Simple to brand and share after a property showing
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — question flow is fixed, not driven by a respondent's actual answers
- No automated quality scoring of individual responses
- No auto-generated qualitative report synthesizing open-ended reasoning
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.