Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Soccer Player Development & Performance Evaluation
A structured evaluation form for coaches, scouts, or player-development staff to rate a soccer player's technical, tactical, physical, and mental attributes, then prioritize development areas. The AI follow-up interview digs into the single biggest development priority with a concrete recent-match example instead of a vague rating.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
Which best describes your relationship to the player you're evaluating?
- Head coach
- Assistant coach
- Scout / recruiter
- Teammate or peer
- Player self-assessment
Q03
매트릭스필수
Rate the player's current level on each technical skill.
5개 행 × 4개 열
- First touch and ball control
- Passing accuracy and range
- Finishing / shooting
- Dribbling under pressure
- 1v1 defending
열: Needs development · Developing · Solid · Strength
Q04
매트릭스필수
Rate the player's current level on each tactical / game-intelligence area.
4개 행 × 4개 열
- Positioning without the ball
- Decision-making under pressure
- Reading the game / anticipation
- Work rate transitioning between attack and defense
열: Needs development · Developing · Solid · Strength
Q05
슬라이더 매트릭스필수
Thinking about the last 5 matches or training sessions, rate the player on each physical attribute.
4개 행, 각 행마다 슬라이더 1개
- Overall physical conditioning in matches
- Speed / acceleration
- Aerial ability and strength in duels
- Recovery after high-intensity efforts
슬라이더 0–10최소:Far below level standard최대:Elite for this level
Q06
의견 척도필수
Over the last 5 matches, how consistently did the player execute their primary tactical role as instructed?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Rarely executed it최대:Executed it every match
Q07
평점 척도필수
Overall, how would you rate this player's current performance level relative to peers at the same position and level?
범위: 1 – 5
최소:Well below average최대:Well above average
Q08
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수
Which of these areas is the highest priority for this player's development right now, and which is the lowest?
- Finishing composure
- Passing range
- Defensive positioning
- Sprint speed
- Decision-making speed
- Leadership and communication
- Aerial duels
- Fitness / stamina
- Set-piece delivery
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Highest development priority최악:Lowest development priority
Q09
AI 인터뷰
Probe the area the evaluator marked as the highest development priority. Get a specific, recent match or training example that shows the gap in action — what happened, what the player did instead of the ideal action, and what got in the way (technique, decision-making, fitness, confidence). Ask what a realistic improvement would look like in the next 4-6 weeks, and if the evaluator seems unsure or gives only a generic answer, ask them to compare the player to a specific teammate or benchmark player who does it well.
Q10
객관식필수
What is your recommended next step for this player?
- Promote to a higher squad / starting role
- Maintain current role with a focused development plan
- Loan or move to a partner club for more playing time
- Release from the program
- Reassess in 3 months
Q11
객관식
Which age group does the player fall into?
- Under 16
- 16-18
- 19-21
- 22-25
- 26 and older
- Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지
Thank you for the detailed evaluation. Your ratings and follow-up interview responses will feed directly into this player's individual development plan.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes matrix and slider-matrix ratings across technical, tactical, and physical/mental attributes rather than a single generic scorecard
- Uses a MaxDiff question to force a clear top development priority instead of leaving all areas rated equally important
- Follows up the flagged priority area with an adaptive AI interview that asks for a concrete recent-match example, not just a numeric score
- Closes with a clear recommended-next-step question and auto-generated report, so coaches get a decision, not just raw ratings
Jotform
Soccer Player Evaluation Form TemplateA static, form-builder style soccer player evaluation template covering standard rating categories. It's built for quick customization and embedding (e.g., in club websites or PDFs) rather than for structured interview-style data collection. No mechanism to probe deeper into any single rated area.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization of fields and layout
- Familiar Jotform ecosystem for embedding, notifications, and PDF export
- Likely quick to set up for coaches unfamiliar with survey tools
아쉬운 점
- Static rating fields only — no adaptive follow-up to dig into a specific weak area
- No built-in mechanism to force prioritization among competing development areas
- No transparent methodology or per-response quality scoring
SurveySparrow
Soccer Player Evaluation Form Template | For High Schools & ClubsA conversational-style survey template aimed at high school and club-level soccer evaluations. It benefits from SurveySparrow's chat-like UI for a friendlier fill-out experience, but the questions themselves remain fixed rather than adaptive to what an evaluator writes or selects. Positioned more for casual club use than rigorous development-priority scouting.
잘하는 점
- Conversational one-question-at-a-time UI improves completion experience
- Explicitly targeted at high schools and clubs, suggesting practical field-readiness
- Likely supports basic branching logic typical of SurveySparrow forms
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe a flagged development priority with real examples
- No structured prioritization step (like a forced-choice ranking) to isolate the single biggest development need
- No transparent, publishable interview prompts or automated quality scoring of responses
Typeform
Soccer Player Evaluation Form TemplateA visually polished, conversational form template in Typeform's signature style, good for capturing basic ratings and comments on a player's performance. It's a fixed-question template with no logic beyond simple branching, and it isn't designed to extract a concrete recent-match example from evaluators. Best suited for lightweight, one-off evaluations rather than structured development planning.
잘하는 점
- Polished, engaging one-question-per-screen design likely improves response rates
- Easy to customize question wording and branding within Typeform's editor
- Familiar tool for many coaches/scouts already using Typeform for other forms
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to follow up on whichever area an evaluator flags as the top priority
- No slider-matrix or MaxDiff-style prioritization mechanism to force ranking of development areas
- No automated quality scoring or auto-generated development report
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.