QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Employee Probationary Period Performance Evaluation

A structured manager assessment of how a new hire is performing during their probationary period, covering core competencies, training support, and readiness for confirmed employment. An AI follow-up interview probes the concrete incidents and evidence behind the manager's recommendation rather than just the rating, producing feedback the employee can actually act on.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking the time to complete this probationary period evaluation. Your honest, specific feedback helps determine the right next step for this employee and gives them clear, fair input. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This should take about 6-8 minutes.

Q02
매트릭스필수

Rate this employee's performance during the probationary period on each of the following:

7개 행 × 4개 열
  • Job knowledge and skills
  • Quality of work
  • Reliability and attendance
  • Communication
  • Teamwork and collaboration
  • 외 2개
열: Below expectations · Approaching expectations · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate this employee's performance during the probationary period?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Far below expectations최대:Far exceeds expectations
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did this employee complete assigned tasks without needing significant rework or correction?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Always
Q05
객관식필수

Did this employee receive the training, tools, and support they needed to succeed in this role?

  • Yes, fully
  • Mostly
  • Partially
  • No
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these areas is most in need of development for this employee, and which is least in need?

  • Technical or job-specific skills
  • Communication
  • Time management
  • Attention to detail
  • Collaboration with the team
  • Initiative
  • Responsiveness to feedback
  • Professionalism
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most in need of development최악:Least in need of development
Q07
객관식필수

Based on this employee's performance, what is your recommendation for their employment status?

  • Confirm employment - performance meets or exceeds expectations
  • Extend the probationary period to allow more time for improvement
  • Terminate employment - performance has not met expectations
  • Undecided - I need further discussion before deciding
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Anchor on the manager's recommendation for this employee's employment status and ask them to walk through 1-2 specific, concrete incidents or examples that best illustrate why. Probe for what changed (or didn't) over the probationary period, and if the recommendation is 'extend' or 'undecided', ask exactly what measurable improvement would need to happen and by when. If the manager rated performance highly but recommends termination or extension (or vice versa), gently surface and clarify that inconsistency.

Q09
평점 척도필수

How confident are you in this recommendation?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not confident at all최대:Extremely confident
Q10
장문형

What specific feedback would help this employee understand your evaluation and know how to improve or what to keep doing? (This may be shared with them.)

Q11
객관식

How long have you directly supervised this employee?

  • Less than 30 days
  • 30-60 days
  • 60-90 days
  • More than 90 days
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

What department does this employee work in?

  • Operations
  • Sales
  • Customer Support
  • Engineering/Technical
  • Administration
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thank you for completing this evaluation. Your responses will be used to finalize the employment decision and shared with HR to support consistent, well-documented probationary reviews.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines a structured competency matrix, overall rating, and task-completion frequency with a max-diff exercise to pinpoint the single most urgent development area, rather than leaving managers to describe it unprompted
  • Includes an AI follow-up interview that anchors on the manager's stated employment recommendation and probes for the concrete incidents and evidence behind it, turning a checkbox rating into something the employee can actually act on
  • Pairs the recommendation with a confidence rating and an open long-text feedback question, plus screening questions on tenure and training/support received, so the report captures both the decision and its justification
  • Purpose-built for the probationary-review workflow specifically (training support adequacy, employment-status recommendation) rather than a generic annual performance form

Jotform

Pharmacy Employee Performance Review Form Template

A static, fielding-ready form built for pharmacy-role performance reviews rather than general probationary evaluations, so it would need reworking to fit a new-hire probation workflow. It benefits from Jotform's mature drag-and-drop builder and integrations, but is industry-specific and not adaptive. No mention of automated interview follow-up or quality scoring.

잘하는 점

  • Established, easy-to-customize form builder with wide integration support
  • Pre-built structure tailored to a specific industry (pharmacy) role review
  • Likely supports file uploads, e-signatures, and standard form logic

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind ratings
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated evaluation reports
  • Built for pharmacy roles specifically, not general probationary-period assessment

Typeform

Employee Performance Evaluation Form Template

A general-purpose, conversational one-question-at-a-time performance evaluation template, fielding-ready but generic rather than probation-specific. Typeform's format is friendly for respondents, but the template is a static survey rather than a system that follows up on individual answers. No indication of voice interviews or automated scoring.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface that's easy for managers to complete
  • Broad general-purpose performance evaluation structure applicable across roles
  • Simple to customize question wording and branching logic

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific incidents behind a rating or recommendation
  • No automated response quality scoring or auto-generated reports
  • Not tailored to probationary-period specifics like training support adequacy or employment-status recommendations

SurveyMonkey

Employee Self-Evaluation Form Template

This is a self-evaluation template where the employee assesses their own performance, which is a different workflow from a manager's probationary assessment of a new hire. It's a fielding-ready static survey on a well-known platform, useful as a reference point but not a direct substitute for a manager-driven probation review.

잘하는 점

  • Recognizable, trusted survey platform with straightforward deployment
  • Ready-to-use self-assessment question set
  • Standard survey logic and reporting dashboard

아쉬운 점

  • Designed for employee self-assessment, not manager evaluation of a new hire's probationary performance
  • Static questions only — no adaptive AI interview to probe evidence behind self-ratings
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기