Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
360-Degree Peer & Manager Feedback Review
Gathers structured multi-rater feedback—from managers, peers, direct reports, and self—on an employee's core competencies and overall effectiveness. An AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete behavioral examples behind the ratings, turning vague impressions into specific, actionable evidence for development conversations.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q02
객관식필수
What is your working relationship with (Employee Name)?
- Manager
- Direct report
- Peer / colleague
- Cross-functional partner
- Self-assessment (this is my own review)
Q03
매트릭스필수
Rate (Employee Name) on each area based on what you've directly observed in the last review period.
6개 행 × 5개 열
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- 외 1개
열: Needs improvement · Below expectations · Meets expectations · Exceeds expectations · Outstanding
Q04
의견 척도필수
Overall, how effective is (Employee Name) in their current role?
척도: 1 – 10
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q05
객관식필수
Which one area best describes (Employee Name)'s greatest strength right now?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Q06
객관식필수
Which one area is the biggest opportunity for (Employee Name) to grow?
- Communication
- Collaboration & teamwork
- Leadership & influence
- Problem-solving & judgment
- Reliability & follow-through
- Adaptability to change
Q07
AI 인터뷰
Probe for a specific, recent example that illustrates both the strength and the growth area the respondent selected: what exactly did (Employee Name) do, in what situation, and what was the observable impact on the team or work? Anchor back to their overall effectiveness rating and ask what would need to change for that score to go up. If the respondent gave uniformly high ratings with no concrete detail, push gently for one real moment rather than a general impression; if they gave low ratings, ask what they'd want (Employee Name) to try differently in the next 30 days.
Q08
장문형
Describe one specific, recent example where you saw (Employee Name) demonstrate the strength you selected above. What did they do, and what was the impact?
Q09
장문형
What's one thing (Employee Name) could start, stop, or do differently to be more effective in their role?
Q10
의견 척도
How likely would you be to choose to work with (Employee Name) again on a future project or team?
척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q11
객관식
How long have you worked with (Employee Name)?
- Less than 6 months
- 6-12 months
- 1-2 years
- More than 2 years
- Prefer not to say
Q12
드롭다운
Which department are you in? (Template note: replace with your own department list before launching.)
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Operations
- Customer Support
- People / HR
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지
That completes (Employee Name)'s 360-degree review. Thank you for the thoughtful feedback — it will be synthesized alongside other reviewers' input and shared with the employee's manager to support their development plan.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that specifically probes for a recent, concrete example illustrating both the rated strength and growth area — turning vague ratings into actionable evidence, not just a static comment box
- Combines structured multi-rater inputs (manager, peer, direct report, self) via a working-relationship question with matrix competency ratings, an overall effectiveness opinion scale, and open strength/growth pickers in one flow
- Pairs quantitative signals (competency matrix, effectiveness scale, 'work with again' likelihood scale) with qualitative long-text prompts on specific behaviors and one thing to start/stop/do differently — built for real development conversations, not just scoring
- Uses transparent, visible prompts throughout (the AI follow-up interview's probing intent is stated in plain language) rather than a black-box adaptive engine
Jotform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA ready-to-use, customizable 360 review form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, likely with rating fields and comment boxes. Good for quick deployment and integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a static form template rather than an interview-driven feedback tool. No indication of adaptive follow-up or automated qualitative analysis of open responses.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Likely supports standard rating scales and comment fields for quick setup
- Broad integrations with Jotform's app ecosystem (e.g., for storage, notifications)
아쉬운 점
- Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up to probe vague ratings for concrete behavioral examples
- No published methodology or prompt transparency for how responses are structured or scored
- No voice AI interview option for raters who prefer speaking over typing
QuestionPro
360-degree Review Survey TemplateA survey-platform template for 360 reviews with QuestionPro's standard survey logic (branching, scales, reporting dashboards). It's positioned as a fielding-ready enterprise survey template with decent reporting depth, but like most survey tools it relies on fixed question sets rather than dynamic interviewing. No mention of AI-driven probing or per-response quality scoring.
잘하는 점
- Enterprise-grade survey platform with established reporting and dashboard tools
- Likely supports skip logic and multiple rater types within one survey
- Established analytics suite for aggregating multi-rater scores
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question sequence — no adaptive AI interview to dig deeper into individual answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring of open-text feedback
- No transparent, visible AI prompt methodology published on the page
SurveySparrow
Manager 360 Feedback TemplateA conversational-style survey template focused specifically on manager 360 feedback, using SurveySparrow's chat-like UI to make form-filling feel more natural. It's a fielding-ready template but scoped to manager feedback rather than full multi-rater (peer/direct-report/self) review, and the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptively AI-driven.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, chat-style interface that may feel more engaging than a static form
- Purpose-built framing for manager-specific feedback
- Mobile-friendly presentation typical of SurveySparrow's product
아쉬운 점
- Narrower scope (manager feedback) versus a full multi-rater 360 including peers, direct reports, and self
- Conversational UI is pre-scripted, not adaptive — no AI follow-up that probes individual answers for specifics
- No indication of automated quality scoring or voice AI interview capability
Typeform
360 Degree Review Form TemplateA polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time form template well-suited to 360 reviews, leveraging Typeform's known strength in respondent experience. It's fielding-ready out of the box, but it's a fixed form flow — there's no dynamic AI interviewing to follow up on vague or generic answers with targeted probing.
잘하는 점
- Clean, one-question-at-a-time UX that Typeform is well known for
- Easy to customize branding and question wording
- Likely mobile-responsive and quick to deploy
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interview — all questions are fixed regardless of how a rater answers
- No automated per-response quality scoring or structured behavioral-evidence extraction
- No published prompt transparency or voice AI interview option
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.