모든 템플릿

Internal Knowledge Findability & Trust Audit

Assesses how employees find, evaluate, and trust internal knowledge resources—measuring findability, content quality, ownership clarity, and tool effectiveness to prioritize knowledge management improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey asks about your experience finding and trusting internal information over the last 30 days. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. All responses are anonymous and will be reported in aggregate to improve our knowledge management practices. There are no right or wrong answers—we value your honest experience. Estimated time: 7–9 minutes.

Q02
객관식

In the last 30 days, how often did you look up internal information to do your work?

  • Several times a day
  • About once a day
  • A few times a week
  • About once a week
  • Less than weekly
  • Not in the last 30 days
Q03
드롭다운

In the last 30 days, how often did you encounter information that was outdated, inaccurate, or inconsistent?

  • Never
  • Rarely
  • Sometimes
  • Often
  • Very often
Q04
순위 매기기

Please rank the following potential improvements from most to least helpful for you.

  1. Better search relevance
  2. Fewer duplicate pages
  3. Clearer ownership and contacts
  4. Standardized templates
  5. Regular content reviews
  6. Faster site performance
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
의견 척도

How likely are you to recommend our internal knowledge systems to a new teammate?

척도: 010
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q06
드롭다운

Which department or function best describes your role?

  • Engineering
  • Product
  • Design
  • Data / Analytics
  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Customer Support
  • Operations
  • HR / People
  • Finance
  • Legal
  • Other (please specify)
Q07
메시지

Thank you for your time. Your feedback will directly inform how we improve the creation, organization, and maintenance of internal knowledge.

Q08
객관식

Where do you usually start when searching for internal information? (Select the one you use most often.)

  • Company wiki / knowledge base
  • Shared drive or cloud folders
  • Chat channels (e.g., Slack, Teams)
  • Project management tool
  • Email archives
  • Ask a colleague directly
  • Internal search portal
  • Team or product docs
  • Other (please specify)
Q09
의견 척도

How would you rate the accuracy of the internal content you used recently?

척도: 17
최소:Very inaccurate최대:Very accurate
Q10
객관식

Which of the following search behaviors do you use regularly? (Select all that apply.)

  • Use filters (type, space, date)
  • Search operators (quotes, AND/OR)
  • Browse by team or project space
  • Saved searches or bookmarks
  • Rely on shared links from others
  • I don't use any of these
Q11
장문형

Briefly describe the biggest blocker you faced in the last 30 days when finding or trusting internal information.

Q12
드롭다운

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • More than 5 years
Q13
드롭다운

On average, how long does it take you to find the internal information you need?

  • Less than 2 minutes
  • 2–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • 11–20 minutes
  • 21–30 minutes
  • More than 30 minutes
  • I usually can't find what I need
Q14
의견 척도

How would you rate the clarity and readability of the internal content you used recently?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q15
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts or feelings about how internal knowledge is managed at our organization. An AI moderator may ask a brief follow-up question.

Q16
드롭다운

In which region do you primarily work?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other / Multiple regions
Q17
의견 척도

Overall, how easy was it to find the right information in the last 30 days?

척도: 17
최소:Extremely difficult최대:Extremely easy
Q18
의견 척도

How would you rate the completeness of the internal content you used recently?

척도: 17
최소:Very incomplete최대:Very complete
Q19
드롭다운

What is your employment type?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contractor
  • Intern
Q20
드롭다운

When you find internal content, how clear is it who owns and maintains it?

  • Always clear
  • Often clear
  • Sometimes clear
  • Rarely clear
  • Never clear
Q21
드롭다운

What is your current work arrangement?

  • On-site
  • Hybrid
  • Remote
Q22
객관식

When content ownership is unclear, what do you most often do?

  • Ask in a team channel or chat
  • Create duplicate content
  • Abandon or postpone the task
  • Open a ticket or request
  • Edit the page and move on
  • Other (please specify)

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview that asks respondents to elaborate on their own answers, not just fixed close-ended questions
  • Pairs quantitative ratings (accuracy, clarity, completeness, ease of finding information) with an open-text question on the biggest blocker faced, giving both scores and context
  • Separates ownership clarity from content quality and findability, and asks what employees actually do when ownership is unclear—useful for prioritizing fixes
  • Segments results by department, tenure, region, employment type, and work arrangement, plus a ranking question on which improvements matter most

QuestionPro

Company - Knowledge Management Survey Template

This is a standard knowledge management survey template covering how employees access and rate internal knowledge resources, built on QuestionPro's established survey platform. It appears to be a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than one that adapts based on individual answers. Good for benchmarking basic KM satisfaction but likely lighter on root-cause diagnosis of ownership and blockers.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by an established, full-featured survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Template is pre-built and likely quick to deploy for a standard KM satisfaction pulse
  • Part of a large template library, so it can be easily paired with other HR/ops surveys

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe deeper into low scores or vague answers
  • No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompts
  • As a fixed-question template, it likely can't dynamically explore why ownership is unclear or what blockers respondents actually hit

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.