QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Manager Performance And Leadership Effectiveness Survey

Captures direct reports' candid ratings of their manager's communication, feedback, recognition, and follow-through, plus a best-worst trade-off on which leadership qualities most need development. The AI follow-up interview digs into the concrete story behind the lowest-rated behavior instead of settling for a number.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on your manager. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your responses are used to support their development, not to penalize them — this should take about 5 minutes.

Q02
매트릭스필수

Thinking about the last few months, how often has your manager done each of the following?

6개 행 × 5개 열
  • Gives clear direction on priorities
  • Provides timely, actionable feedback
  • Recognizes good work
  • Advocates for the team's needs
  • Handles conflict fairly
  • 외 1개
열: Never · Rarely · Sometimes · Often · Always
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how effective is your manager at leading and supporting your team?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not effective at all최대:Extremely effective
Q04
객관식필수

In the last 30 days, how often did your manager give you feedback on your work (positive or constructive)?

  • Not at all
  • Once
  • A few times
  • About weekly
  • More than once a week
Q05
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the clarity of your manager's communication about goals and expectations?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q06
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these qualities matter most for your manager to develop further?

  • Clear communication of goals
  • Recognizing good work
  • Fair distribution of workload
  • Supporting career growth
  • Making timely decisions
  • Resolving conflicts fairly
  • Being approachable
  • Setting a clear strategic direction
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important to develop최악:Least important to develop
Q07
객관식

In the last 3 months, how has your manager recognized your good work? (Select all that apply)

  • Public praise in team meetings
  • Private thank-you or note
  • Formal recognition program or award
  • Extra opportunities or interesting projects
  • Pay or bonus adjustment
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Reconstruct a specific recent moment that shaped the respondent's overall effectiveness rating for their manager, especially if it diverges from their frequency ratings. Probe the lowest-rated behavior area (feedback, recognition, conflict resolution, follow-through) for a concrete example of what happened and what the manager could have done differently. If the respondent rated everything high, ask what one thing would make an already-good manager even better; if they rated most things low, ask what single change would most improve their day-to-day experience.

Q09
드롭다운

How long have you reported to your current manager?

  • Less than 3 months
  • 3–6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • More than 2 years
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
객관식

Which department do you work in? (Template note: replace these department options with your own organizational list before launching.)

  • (Replace with Department A)
  • (Replace with Department B)
  • (Replace with Department C)
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

What is your employment type?

  • Full-time
  • Part-time
  • Contractor
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for your honest feedback! Your ratings and comments will be aggregated with your team's responses to support your manager's development plan — individual answers are never shared verbatim.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes a matrix of specific manager behaviors (communication, feedback, recognition, follow-through) plus a direct opinion-scale rating of overall leadership effectiveness
  • Uses a best-worst (max-diff) trade-off to force-rank which leadership qualities most need development, avoiding flat 'everything is important' results
  • Pairs the quantitative ratings with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific recent moment behind the respondent's lowest-rated behavior, turning a number into a concrete story
  • Captures context (tenure with manager, department, employment type) so results can be segmented, and closes with a transparent note on how responses will be aggregated

Jotform

Management Performance Survey Form Template

A ready-to-field static form for gathering feedback on a manager's performance, built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder. Good for quick deployment and basic customization, but it relies on fixed question sets with no mechanism to probe deeper into any single answer. There's no published scoring methodology for responses.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template usable immediately
  • Familiar drag-and-drop customization via Jotform's builder
  • Easy integration with Jotform's broader form ecosystem (payments, notifications, etc.)

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive follow-up when a rating is low
  • No voice interview or screen-share task option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

SurveyMonkey

Management Performance Survey Template

A standard fielding-ready survey template from an established survey platform, likely covering common manager-effectiveness dimensions with SurveyMonkey's usual analytics dashboard. It's built for broad distribution and benchmarking rather than deep qualitative follow-up. Reporting is templated rather than generated per respondent story.

잘하는 점

  • Established platform with strong distribution and panel options
  • Built-in analytics and benchmarking dashboards
  • Quick to launch with minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to dig into the story behind a low rating
  • No voice AI interview or guided screen-share task option
  • No transparent, response-level prompt or scoring methodology published

Typeform

Performance Management Survey Template

A conversational-style static template from Typeform focused on performance management generally; it may need adaptation to specifically target direct-report ratings of a manager's leadership. Typeform's format is friendly and mobile-first, but questions are fixed once published. There is no mechanism to automatically follow up on a specific low score with further questioning.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UX
  • Mobile-friendly design that can improve completion rates
  • Easy visual customization to match branding

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview or voice interview capability
  • No guided screen-share task option for gathering evidence
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt disclosure

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기