모든 템플릿

API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey

Measures developer sentiment toward API deprecation timelines, guidance clarity, and migration burden to inform improvements in API lifecycle communication and support practices.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the API Deprecation & Migration Experience Survey. This survey explores your experience with API or platform deprecations, including timeline fairness, guidance quality, and migration effort. Your responses will help improve how deprecations are communicated and managed. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers — we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. Estimated time: 6–8 minutes.

Q02
객관식

When did you most recently encounter an API or platform deprecation that affected your work?

  • In the last 30 days
  • 31–90 days ago
  • 3–6 months ago
  • 7–12 months ago
  • Over 12 months ago
  • I have not encountered one
Q03
객관식

Was a specific removal or sunset date provided for the deprecation?

  • Yes, a specific date
  • No, only general timing (e.g., 'later this year')
  • Not sure / wasn't stated
Q04
의견 척도

How clear was the deprecation guidance you received (e.g., migration documentation, changelogs)?

척도: 17
최소:Very unclear최대:Very clear
Q05
의견 척도

How much effort did the migration require for your codebase?

척도: 17
최소:Minimal effort최대:Extreme effort
Q06
객관식

Where did you first learn about the deprecation?

  • Email notification
  • In-product banner or console
  • Release notes or changelog
  • API response headers or warnings
  • Documentation site
  • Social media or community post
  • Colleague or internal announcement
  • I don't recall
Q07
드롭다운

What is your primary role?

  • Backend engineer
  • Frontend engineer
  • Full-stack engineer
  • Mobile engineer
  • DevOps / SRE
  • Data / ML engineer
  • Architect
  • Engineering manager
  • Product manager
  • Other
Q08
장문형

Based on your responses in this survey, what would make deprecation timelines and guidance clearer and fairer for you?

Q09
드롭다운

Who initiated the deprecation you most recently experienced?

  • Cloud platform provider
  • SaaS or API vendor
  • Open-source project maintainers
  • Internal team at my company
  • Hardware/device vendor
  • Not sure
Q10
드롭다운

Approximately how many weeks of advance notice were you given before the deprecation took effect?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • 13–26 weeks (3–6 months)
  • More than 26 weeks (6+ months)
  • Not sure
Q11
의견 척도

How would you rate the clarity of step-by-step migration instructions?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q12
순위 매기기

Rank the following pain points from most to least impactful during your deprecation and migration experience.

  1. Understanding what changed
  2. Planning the migration timeline
  3. Refactoring code
  4. Updating dependencies
  5. Testing and validation
  6. Coordinating across teams
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q13
의견 척도

After this deprecation experience, how did your trust in the vendor or provider change?

척도: 17
최소:Decreased significantly최대:Increased significantly
Q14
드롭다운

How many years of professional software development experience do you have?

  • Less than 1
  • 1–3
  • 4–6
  • 7–10
  • 11–15
  • 16+
Q15
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your deprecation experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q16
의견 척도

Overall, how fair was the deprecation timeline you experienced?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q17
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of code examples or migration guides provided?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q18
드롭다운

Approximately how many employees does your organization have?

  • 1–10
  • 11–50
  • 51–200
  • 201–1,000
  • 1,001–5,000
  • 5,001–10,000
  • 10,001+
Q19
메시지

Thank you for your time — your feedback will directly inform how we improve deprecation practices and developer experience.

Q20
드롭다운

What is the minimum number of weeks of advance notice you consider fair for breaking API changes?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 5–8 weeks
  • 9–12 weeks
  • 13–26 weeks (3–6 months)
  • More than 26 weeks (6+ months)
Q21
의견 척도

How would you rate the completeness of the breaking-changes documentation?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q22
드롭다운

Which region are you primarily based in?

  • North America
  • Latin America
  • Europe
  • Middle East
  • Africa
  • East Asia
  • South Asia
  • Southeast Asia
  • Oceania
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Combines structured questions (timeline fairness, notice period, documentation clarity, migration effort) with an adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe the specific pain points a respondent flags, rather than relying only on fixed-choice answers
  • Includes a dedicated ranking question to force prioritization of pain points and multiple opinion-scale items covering guidance clarity, code example quality, and documentation completeness so results are directly actionable for API/dev-relations teams
  • Captures respondent context (role, years of experience, org size, region) enabling segmentation of migration-burden feedback by developer seniority or company size
  • Closes with an open-text reflection question plus an AI-moderated follow-up interview, giving both quantifiable scores and rich qualitative detail on what would make deprecation timelines and support better

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.