Secondary Trauma & Compassion Fatigue Check-In
For therapists, social workers, first responders, nurses, and other helping professionals regularly exposed to other people's trauma. Measures exposure levels, secondary traumatic stress symptoms, coping habits, and organizational support gaps, with an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific case or incident behind a respondent's most acute symptom rather than relying on abstract self-ratings.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
In the last 30 days, how often has your work required you to directly hear or witness detailed accounts of someone else's traumatic experience (e.g., abuse, violence, disaster, medical trauma)?
- Never
- A few times
- Weekly
- A few times a week
- Daily or almost daily
In the last 30 days, how often have you noticed each of the following?
- Unwanted, intrusive thoughts or images related to a case or incident you weren't directly part of
- Avoiding people, places, or media that remind you of work-related trauma
- Feeling constantly on edge, jumpy, or hypervigilant
- Emotional numbness or feeling detached from people you care about
- Trouble falling or staying asleep because of work-related thoughts
Overall, how much has hearing or witnessing others' traumatic experiences affected your own emotional wellbeing in the last 30 days?
Which of the following do you currently use to cope with the emotional impact of your work? Select all that apply.
- Talking with colleagues informally
- Formal supervision or case debriefing
- Exercise or physical activity
- Therapy or counseling for myself
- Limiting exposure to trauma-related content outside work
- Spiritual or faith-based practice
- Alcohol or substances to relax
- Journaling or creative outlets
How much do you agree with each statement about support at your current workplace?
- My supervisor checks in on how I'm coping, not just my caseload or productivity
- My workload allows enough time to process difficult cases
- I have access to trained peer support or debriefing after critical incidents
- My organization provides training on managing secondary trauma
- I would feel comfortable telling my supervisor I'm struggling with a case
If your organization could add or improve one support at a time, which would help most and which would help least?
- Mandatory debriefing after difficult cases
- Caseload or exposure limits
- More frequent clinical supervision
- Access to confidential counseling
- Structured peer support groups
- Paid mental health days
- Training on secondary trauma resilience
- Flexible scheduling after critical incidents
Identify the specific case, client, or incident (without needing identifying details) that has affected this respondent most in the last 30 days, and reconstruct what happened afterward: did they talk to anyone, take time to process it, or push through without support. If they flagged a support gap in the workplace statements, probe concretely what would have made the biggest difference in that moment. If they report minimal impact, ask what specific habits or boundaries they use that seem to be working, so they can be shared as protective practices.
Is there anything about how secondary trauma shows up in your work that we haven't asked about?
Almost done — just a few background questions to help us understand patterns across roles. All optional.
Which best describes your role? (Template note: replace with your organization's actual role categories before launching.)
- (Replace with Role A, e.g., Case Manager)
- (Replace with Role B, e.g., Therapist/Counselor)
- (Replace with Role C, e.g., First Responder)
- (Replace with Role D, e.g., Nurse/Medical Staff)
- Prefer not to say
How long have you worked in a role that involves regular exposure to others' trauma?
- Less than 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 4-7 years
- 8-15 years
- More than 15 years
- Prefer not to say
What best describes your primary work setting?
- In-person direct service
- Remote or telehealth
- Hybrid
- Administrative or supervisory
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for being honest about something that's hard to talk about. Responses are aggregated and never tied to individuals, and the findings will directly inform staffing, supervision, and support planning. If you need support now, please reach out to your supervisor or your organization's employee assistance program.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific case or incident behind a respondent's most acute symptom, rather than stopping at abstract self-ratings
- Combines quantitative measures (slider matrix on symptom frequency, opinion scale on overall impact, matrix on workplace support) with qualitative depth so patterns and root causes both surface
- Uses a max-diff exercise to prioritize which organizational support to add next, giving programs actionable direction rather than just a diagnostic score
- Closes with a long-text reflection and a de-identified background section, so responses can be compared across roles, tenure, and work settings without compromising anonymity
QuestionPro
Secondary Trauma Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a sample questionnaire and question bank for secondary trauma rather than an interactive fielding tool with adaptive logic. It covers similar ground (exposure, symptoms, coping) but presents standard survey question types for researchers to copy or adapt. Useful as a reference library more than a ready-to-run respondent experience.
잘하는 점
- Directly targeted at secondary trauma, matching the topic closely
- Provides sample questions researchers can copy into their own survey tool
- Backed by a large established survey platform with broad question-type support
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe the specific incident behind a symptom — respondents only self-rate
- No mention of voice AI interviews or screen-share guided tasks
- No published methodology for how quality or depth of response is scored
Jotform
Psychological Trauma Questionnaire Form TemplateThis template is built for general psychological trauma intake (e.g., clinical or patient-facing use) rather than the workplace secondary-trauma/compassion-fatigue focus for helping professionals — the audience and intent differ from ours. It's a static, drag-and-drop form, easy to customize and deploy quickly, but not designed to explore an incident behind a rated symptom. Best treated as a general-purpose form builder template rather than a specialized secondary trauma instrument.
잘하는 점
- Fast to set up and customize using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
- Familiar, broadly accessible form format for respondents
- Part of a large template library with easy integrations (payments, notifications, etc.)
아쉬운 점
- Not specific to secondary trauma or helping-professional exposure — targeted at general psychological trauma intake
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up interview or case reconstruction
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.