QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

End-of-Course Student Feedback Survey

Captures how students experienced a course — clarity of instruction, workload, materials, and instructor effectiveness — plus a best-worst prioritization of what to fix first. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind the overall rating so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of a single number.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share honest feedback on this course. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your responses help the instructor improve it for future students and are more useful the more specific you are. About 5 minutes.

Q02
단문형필수

Which course is this feedback about? (Include course code or section if known.)

Q03
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to recommend this course to another student in your program?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q04
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each statement about this course?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • The learning objectives were clear from the start
  • The workload was manageable given the credit hours
  • The instructor was accessible when I needed help
  • Assessments (exams, assignments) fairly reflected what was taught
  • Course materials (readings, slides, examples) were useful
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q05
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the instructor's teaching effectiveness this term?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q06
객관식필수

In a typical week this term, how often did you actively participate (asking questions, discussion, group work) in this course?

  • Never
  • Rarely (once or twice all term)
  • Sometimes (a few times a month)
  • Most weeks
  • Every session
Q07
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Of the areas below, which most needs improvement and which is least in need of improvement?

  • Pacing of lectures or modules
  • Clarity of explanations
  • Amount and manageability of workload
  • Speed and usefulness of feedback on assignments
  • Opportunities for questions and discussion
  • Quality of course materials
  • Fairness and clarity of grading
  • Availability of the instructor outside class
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most needs improvement최악:Least needs improvement
Q08
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's recommendation likelihood score and their lowest-agreement statement in the rating battery. Ask for a specific moment or example (a lecture, assignment, or interaction) that shaped their view, and whether it was a one-time issue or happened repeatedly. If they flagged an area in the improvement trade-off, ask what a fix would concretely look like from their perspective. If their overall rating was high, ask what almost went wrong or could break next term.

Q09
객관식

Would you take another course from this instructor if your schedule allowed?

  • Yes, definitely
  • Probably
  • Not sure
  • Probably not
  • No
Q10
객관식

What year of study are you currently in?

  • First year
  • Second year
  • Third year
  • Fourth year or beyond
  • Graduate student
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

What is your primary program or major?

  • (Replace with your program list, e.g. Business, Engineering, Arts)
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

That's everything — thank you for the detailed feedback! Your responses will be reviewed by the instructor and department to shape improvements for the next offering of this course.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond a single satisfaction score by pairing a numeric recommendation rating with an AI follow-up interview that probes the reasoning behind it, so instructors get specific, actionable detail instead of just a number
  • Includes a max-diff best-worst prioritization exercise so instructors know what to fix first, not just what students are dissatisfied with
  • Combines structured measurement (matrix agreement statements, instructor effectiveness rating, participation frequency) with open-ended context, giving both quantifiable trends and qualitative reasoning
  • Captures program/year-of-study context alongside course-specific feedback, enabling segmentation without extra survey design work

Jotform

Distance Learning Feedback Form for Students

This is a fielding-ready static form aimed at distance/remote learning feedback rather than general in-person course evaluation. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder with standard field types. Useful as a quick-start template, but it collects fixed responses only with no mechanism to dig deeper into any single answer.

잘하는 점

  • Ready to deploy immediately with Jotform's established form-building and distribution tools
  • Purpose-built for remote/distance learning context, which may better match online-course use cases
  • Likely supports standard field types (ratings, multiple choice, text) common to feedback forms

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe reasoning behind ratings
  • No built-in prioritization mechanism (e.g., best-worst scaling) to rank what needs fixing first
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analytical report

SurveySparrow

Student Feedback Survey Template

A general-purpose student feedback template rather than one tailored specifically to end-of-course evaluation. It's presented as a conversational, ready-to-use survey on SurveySparrow's platform. It covers broad feedback themes but doesn't appear to include a structured prioritization exercise or deeper reasoning capture.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-style survey format that can feel more engaging than a traditional form
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup
  • General education framing makes it adaptable across course types

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview to follow up on low or high ratings with targeted questions
  • No best-worst prioritization to identify the single most urgent area to address
  • No transparent, published probing methodology or automated quality scoring of responses

Typeform

Student Feedback Survey Template

A conversational, one-question-at-a-time survey template well-suited to general student feedback collection. It's a static template built for Typeform's polished form experience rather than course-evaluation-specific research design. It doesn't appear to include voice interviews, adaptive probing, or a formal prioritization method.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, one-question-at-a-time interface known for strong completion rates
  • Easy to customize branding and question flow within Typeform's builder
  • Ready to deploy quickly for general student feedback needs

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question flow with no adaptive AI follow-up to explore the 'why' behind a rating
  • No best-worst prioritization feature to surface the top issue to fix first
  • No automated quality scoring or auto-generated report synthesizing open-ended responses

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기