모든 템플릿

Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment

Assesses treasury risk visibility, counterparty exposure management practices, and control effectiveness. Designed for treasury, risk, and front-office professionals to benchmark current capabilities and prioritize improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Treasury & Counterparty Risk Controls Assessment. This survey gathers your perspectives on treasury risk visibility, counterparty exposure management, and the effectiveness of current controls and systems. Your responses will be used to benchmark current capabilities and prioritize improvements. Participation is voluntary, and you may exit at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest professional judgment. All responses will be kept confidential and reported only in aggregate. Estimated completion time: 10–12 minutes.

Q02
객관식

How directly are you involved in counterparty exposure management?

  • Directly responsible
  • Regularly involved
  • Occasionally consulted
  • Aware but not involved
Q03
의견 척도

How clear is your organization's treasury risk landscape at present?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q04
의견 척도

How would you rate your organization's visibility into consolidated counterparty exposures over the past 30 days?

척도: 17
최소:No visibility최대:Full visibility
Q05
의견 척도

Over the past 6 months, how clearly defined have roles and responsibilities been for limit setting and overrides?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all clear최대:Extremely clear
Q06
의견 척도

How adequate is your organization's current system support for counterparty exposure aggregation?

척도: 17
최소:Completely inadequate최대:Fully adequate
Q07
의견 척도

Over the past 30 days, how timely has treasury risk reporting been to key stakeholders?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all timely최대:Highly timely
Q08
객관식

What is your primary role or function?

  • Treasury operations
  • Risk management
  • Front office/trading
  • Finance/controllership
  • Technology/IT
  • Compliance/Legal
  • Other (please specify)
Q09
장문형

If you could change one thing next quarter to improve counterparty exposure management, what would it be?

Q10
순위 매기기

Rank the following treasury risks by criticality for the next 3 months (1 = most critical).

  1. Liquidity risk
  2. Counterparty/credit risk
  3. Foreign exchange risk
  4. Interest rate risk
  5. Payment fraud/cyber risk
  6. Regulatory/compliance risk
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q11
객관식

How often are counterparty exposure figures refreshed or updated in your organization?

  • Real-time/streaming
  • Hourly
  • Daily
  • Weekly
  • Less than weekly
  • Not sure
Q12
객관식

Which method does your organization primarily use to estimate potential future exposure (PFE)?

  • Simple add-on factors
  • Historical simulation
  • Monte Carlo simulation
  • Standardized approach (e.g., SA-CCR)
  • Not sure
Q13
의견 척도

How adequate is your organization's current system support for collateral management?

척도: 17
최소:Completely inadequate최대:Fully adequate
Q14
순위 매기기

Rank the following areas by how much improvement would reduce treasury risk over the next quarter (1 = greatest impact).

  1. Data quality and reconciliations
  2. Systems automation for aggregation
  3. Limit framework (setting/monitoring)
  4. Collateral management processes
  5. Reporting speed and accuracy
  6. Stress testing and scenarios
  7. Training and process clarity
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q15
객관식

What is your job level?

  • Analyst/Associate
  • Manager
  • Director
  • Executive
  • Other
Q16
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your perspectives on treasury risk and counterparty exposure in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions based on your earlier responses.

Q17
객관식

Which techniques does your organization currently use to mitigate counterparty exposure? (Select all that apply)

  • Bilateral netting
  • CSA/collateral agreements
  • Counterparty exposure limits
  • Diversification across counterparties
  • Guarantees or credit insurance
  • None of the above
  • Other (please specify)
Q18
객관식

How frequently has your organization performed exposure stress tests in the past 6 months?

  • Monthly
  • Quarterly
  • Semi-annually
  • Annually or less
  • Not performed
  • Not sure
Q19
의견 척도

How adequate is your organization's current system support for limit monitoring and breach alerts?

척도: 17
최소:Completely inadequate최대:Fully adequate
Q20
드롭다운

How many years have you been in your current role?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–3 years
  • 4–6 years
  • 7–10 years
  • More than 10 years
Q21
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your input will directly inform treasury risk improvement priorities for next quarter.

Q22
드롭다운

Approximately how many counterparty limit breaches occurred in your organization in the last 90 days?

  • 0
  • 1–2
  • 3–5
  • 6–10
  • More than 10
  • Not sure / not tracked
Q23
의견 척도

How adequate is your organization's current system support for treasury risk reporting and dashboards?

척도: 17
최소:Completely inadequate최대:Fully adequate
Q24
객관식

Which region do you primarily support?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Multiple regions
Q25
장문형

Please briefly describe any workflow gaps that have caused risk or delays in the past 3 months.

Q26
객관식

Which teams do you primarily support? (Select all that apply)

  • Treasury
  • Trading
  • Corporate finance
  • Payments
  • Other (please specify)

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an adaptive AI follow-up interview segment that lets treasury and risk professionals elaborate on exposure gaps in their own words, beyond fixed-choice questions
  • Combines quantitative benchmarking (opinion scales on system support for exposure monitoring, collateral management, limit monitoring, and reporting) with ranking questions to prioritize the most critical treasury risks and improvement areas
  • Captures workflow gaps and process delays through open-text responses, plus role, seniority, region, and team-coverage segmentation for benchmarking across the organization
  • Ends with an AI-guided qualitative interview on treasury risk perspectives, giving richer context than a static questionnaire alone

Jotform

Risk-Management Self-Assessment Form Template

A generic risk-management self-assessment form builder template rather than a treasury or counterparty-specific instrument. It's a customizable static form meant for quick self-assessment rather than deep benchmarking, useful as a starting structure but not purpose-built for treasury/counterparty risk controls.

잘하는 점

  • Simple, quick-to-deploy self-assessment format
  • Drag-and-drop form customization typical of Jotform's builder
  • Broad applicability across general risk-management contexts

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive AI follow-up probing on flagged risk areas
  • Not tailored to treasury/counterparty exposure concepts (limits, breaches, CVA/PFE methods, collateral)
  • No transparent scoring methodology or automated report generation described

QuestionPro

Risk Culture Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire Template

Positioned around risk culture and general risk-assessment survey questions, functioning partly as a guide/sample-questionnaire resource rather than a ready-to-field treasury-specific template. It's useful for broad organizational risk-culture sentiment but doesn't address counterparty exposure mechanics.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey-platform infrastructure for distribution and reporting
  • Sample questions cover general risk-culture attitudes and perceptions
  • Familiar multiple-choice/scale question formats

아쉬운 점

  • Focused on risk culture broadly, not counterparty exposure, limit breaches, or collateral/CVA-PFE specifics
  • Static question set — no adaptive AI interview or voice AI follow-up to probe control gaps
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.