Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey
Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which of the following best describes your current teaching appointment?
- Adjunct or part-time instructor
- Full-time non-tenure track
- Tenure-track or tenured
- Graduate TA/Instructor
- Multiple roles (including adjunct)
- Other
Overall, how satisfied are you with your adjunct or part-time teaching experience this term?
How responsive has your department or program been to your questions or requests this term?
How would you rate the fairness of your compensation relative to your workload this term?
How satisfied are you with the technology and learning management system (LMS) available for your courses?
Please rank the following areas from most to least in need of improvement for adjunct instructors at your institution.
- Compensation and benefits
- Course scheduling predictability
- Communication from department
- Access to teaching resources
- Recognition and respect
What type of institution are you teaching at this term?
- Public 2-year (community/technical college)
- Public 4-year university
- Private nonprofit
- Private for-profit
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to inform improvements for adjunct and part-time instructors at your institution. We appreciate your time and honest feedback.
How many courses are you teaching this term?
- 0 (not currently teaching)
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5 or more
At the start of this term, how prepared did you feel to teach your assigned course(s)?
How satisfied are you with the onboarding or orientation support you received for your current course(s)?
How satisfied are you with your per-course pay rate?
How satisfied are you with the course materials and curriculum support provided to you?
Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience as an adjunct instructor? Please share your thoughts and the moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions.
How long have you taught in an adjunct or part-time capacity in total?
- Less than 1 year
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6–10 years
- 11–15 years
- 16–20 years
- More than 20 years
How satisfied are you with access to mentoring or peer support from other faculty?
How satisfied are you with your access to benefits (e.g., health insurance, retirement)?
How satisfied are you with your physical workspace or classroom facilities?
What is your primary broad discipline area?
- STEM
- Social sciences
- Humanities
- Arts
- Business
- Health professions
- Education
- Other
- Prefer not to say
How satisfied are you with opportunities for professional development available to you?
How satisfied are you with the predictability and timeliness of your pay?
Typically, how far in advance are you notified of a new course assignment?
- Less than 1 week
- 1–2 weeks
- 3–4 weeks
- 1–2 months
- More than 2 months
- Not applicable
In which region is your institution located?
- Northeast (U.S.)
- Midwest (U.S.)
- South (U.S.)
- West (U.S.)
- Outside the U.S.
- Prefer not to say
What is your gender identity?
- Woman
- Man
- Non-binary
- Prefer to self-describe
- Prefer not to say
What is your age range?
- Under 25
- 25–34
- 35–44
- 45–54
- 55–64
- 65 or older
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on pay equity, benefits, and pay predictability with an AI follow-up interview that asks each respondent to identify their single most important improvement area, generating richer qualitative context than fixed-choice forms alone
- Covers the full adjunct experience lifecycle in one instrument — onboarding, mentoring, professional development, scheduling notice, LMS/tech support, and classroom facilities — rather than a generic faculty satisfaction snapshot
- Includes a ranking question forcing respondents to prioritize improvement areas (pay, support, resources, scheduling), giving administrators a clear action hierarchy instead of just averages
- Segments results by institution type, discipline, region, appointment length, and demographics, enabling equity-focused subgroup analysis specific to adjunct/part-time status
QuestionPro
University Faculty Satisfaction SurveyA general faculty satisfaction template covering broad workplace topics like workload and campus climate, not adjunct-specific pay equity or scheduling predictability. It's a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview tool. Useful as a generic starting point but requires heavy customization for adjunct/part-time-specific compensation issues.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with a ready-made faculty satisfaction template
- Covers general faculty experience topics applicable across institution types
- Likely offers standard survey logic and reporting dashboards
아쉬운 점
- Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
- No adjunct-specific focus on per-course pay, benefits access, or assignment notice timing
- No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative scoring of open responses
SurveyMonkey
University Faculty Satisfaction Survey QuestionsSurveyMonkey's faculty satisfaction template targets general faculty sentiment rather than the specific pay-equity and scheduling concerns unique to adjunct and part-time instructors. It's a static question bank designed for broad customization, not a purpose-built adjunct compensation instrument. Reporting is standard dashboard analytics rather than narrative, interview-based insight.
잘하는 점
- Widely used platform with strong survey distribution and basic analytics tools
- Faculty-focused template saves time versus building from scratch
- Simple to customize question wording for different institution types
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up to probe pay equity or workload concerns
- Not tailored to adjunct-specific issues like per-course pay or last-minute scheduling
- No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.