모든 템플릿

Adjunct Faculty Experience & Compensation Survey

Measures adjunct and part-time instructor satisfaction across pay equity, institutional support, teaching resources, and scheduling predictability. Designed for higher education administrators seeking actionable data to improve adjunct working conditions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 26개 · 약 11분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Adjunct Faculty Experience Survey. This survey is designed to understand the experiences of adjunct and part-time instructors in higher education. Your responses will help inform improvements to pay, support, resources, and working conditions. Participation is entirely voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. The survey takes approximately 8–10 minutes to complete.

Q02
객관식

Which of the following best describes your current teaching appointment?

  • Adjunct or part-time instructor
  • Full-time non-tenure track
  • Tenure-track or tenured
  • Graduate TA/Instructor
  • Multiple roles (including adjunct)
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with your adjunct or part-time teaching experience this term?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
의견 척도

How responsive has your department or program been to your questions or requests this term?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all responsive최대:Extremely responsive
Q05
의견 척도

How would you rate the fairness of your compensation relative to your workload this term?

척도: 17
최소:Very unfair최대:Very fair
Q06
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the technology and learning management system (LMS) available for your courses?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q07
순위 매기기

Please rank the following areas from most to least in need of improvement for adjunct instructors at your institution.

  1. Compensation and benefits
  2. Course scheduling predictability
  3. Communication from department
  4. Access to teaching resources
  5. Recognition and respect
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q08
객관식

What type of institution are you teaching at this term?

  • Public 2-year (community/technical college)
  • Public 4-year university
  • Private nonprofit
  • Private for-profit
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to inform improvements for adjunct and part-time instructors at your institution. We appreciate your time and honest feedback.

Q10
드롭다운

How many courses are you teaching this term?

  • 0 (not currently teaching)
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5 or more
Q11
의견 척도

At the start of this term, how prepared did you feel to teach your assigned course(s)?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all prepared최대:Very well prepared
Q12
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the onboarding or orientation support you received for your current course(s)?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q13
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your per-course pay rate?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q14
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the course materials and curriculum support provided to you?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q15
AI 인터뷰

Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your experience as an adjunct instructor? Please share your thoughts and the moderator will ask a few brief follow-up questions.

Q16
드롭다운

How long have you taught in an adjunct or part-time capacity in total?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6–10 years
  • 11–15 years
  • 16–20 years
  • More than 20 years
Q17
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with access to mentoring or peer support from other faculty?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q18
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your access to benefits (e.g., health insurance, retirement)?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q19
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your physical workspace or classroom facilities?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q20
객관식

What is your primary broad discipline area?

  • STEM
  • Social sciences
  • Humanities
  • Arts
  • Business
  • Health professions
  • Education
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with opportunities for professional development available to you?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q22
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with the predictability and timeliness of your pay?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q23
드롭다운

Typically, how far in advance are you notified of a new course assignment?

  • Less than 1 week
  • 1–2 weeks
  • 3–4 weeks
  • 1–2 months
  • More than 2 months
  • Not applicable
Q24
객관식

In which region is your institution located?

  • Northeast (U.S.)
  • Midwest (U.S.)
  • South (U.S.)
  • West (U.S.)
  • Outside the U.S.
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
객관식

What is your gender identity?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer to self-describe
  • Prefer not to say
Q26
객관식

What is your age range?

  • Under 25
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65 or older
  • Prefer not to say

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured opinion-scale ratings on pay equity, benefits, and pay predictability with an AI follow-up interview that asks each respondent to identify their single most important improvement area, generating richer qualitative context than fixed-choice forms alone
  • Covers the full adjunct experience lifecycle in one instrument — onboarding, mentoring, professional development, scheduling notice, LMS/tech support, and classroom facilities — rather than a generic faculty satisfaction snapshot
  • Includes a ranking question forcing respondents to prioritize improvement areas (pay, support, resources, scheduling), giving administrators a clear action hierarchy instead of just averages
  • Segments results by institution type, discipline, region, appointment length, and demographics, enabling equity-focused subgroup analysis specific to adjunct/part-time status

QuestionPro

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey

A general faculty satisfaction template covering broad workplace topics like workload and campus climate, not adjunct-specific pay equity or scheduling predictability. It's a static, ready-to-field questionnaire rather than an adaptive interview tool. Useful as a generic starting point but requires heavy customization for adjunct/part-time-specific compensation issues.

잘하는 점

  • Established survey platform with a ready-made faculty satisfaction template
  • Covers general faculty experience topics applicable across institution types
  • Likely offers standard survey logic and reporting dashboards

아쉬운 점

  • Fixed question set with no adaptive AI follow-up probing into individual responses
  • No adjunct-specific focus on per-course pay, benefits access, or assignment notice timing
  • No transparent prompt methodology or automated qualitative scoring of open responses

SurveyMonkey

University Faculty Satisfaction Survey Questions

SurveyMonkey's faculty satisfaction template targets general faculty sentiment rather than the specific pay-equity and scheduling concerns unique to adjunct and part-time instructors. It's a static question bank designed for broad customization, not a purpose-built adjunct compensation instrument. Reporting is standard dashboard analytics rather than narrative, interview-based insight.

잘하는 점

  • Widely used platform with strong survey distribution and basic analytics tools
  • Faculty-focused template saves time versus building from scratch
  • Simple to customize question wording for different institution types

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice-based follow-up to probe pay equity or workload concerns
  • Not tailored to adjunct-specific issues like per-course pay or last-minute scheduling
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.