QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Peer Feedback and Working Relationship Survey

Gathers structured peer feedback on a specific colleague's collaboration, reliability, and communication habits, plus a best-worst ranking of their standout strengths. An AI follow-up interview digs into a concrete recent example behind the ratings, so the feedback reads as evidence, not just scores.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 10개 · 약 6분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to give feedback on a colleague. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Be specific and constructive — this helps them grow, and your responses will be shared thoughtfully. About 5 minutes.

Q02
객관식필수

What is your working relationship with this person? (Template note: pair this survey with a single named colleague per send.)

  • Direct peer or teammate
  • Their manager
  • Their direct report
  • Cross-functional partner
Q03
매트릭스필수

Based on your experience working with this person in the last few months, how often do they do each of the following?

5개 행 × 4개 열
  • Communicates clearly and proactively
  • Follows through on commitments and deadlines
  • Collaborates well across teams or functions
  • Responds constructively when given feedback
  • Takes initiative on problems outside their core role
열: Rarely · Sometimes · Usually · Almost always
Q04
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to want to work with this person again on a future project?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q05
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

From this list, which trait is most and least representative of this person?

  • Clear communication
  • Reliability
  • Technical expertise
  • Collaboration
  • Problem-solving
  • Mentorship
  • Adaptability
  • Initiative
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most representative최악:Least representative
Q06
객관식필수

If this person focused on developing one area, which would have the biggest impact on their effectiveness?

  • Clearer or more frequent communication
  • Following through more consistently
  • Collaborating earlier with other teams
  • Taking more initiative
  • Deeper technical skill
  • Mentoring or supporting others more
Q07
AI 인터뷰필수

Ask the respondent to walk through one specific, recent situation where they worked with this person, focusing on what the person did well and what got in the way if anything. If the respondent flagged a growth area above, probe for a concrete example of that gap and what a better version of that moment would have looked like. Avoid letting the answer stay abstract — anchor on one real event, not a general impression.

Q08
장문형

Anything else about this person's impact on the team you'd like to add?

Q09
객관식

Which best describes your own role level? (Optional, used only to see if feedback patterns differ by seniority.)

  • Individual contributor
  • Manager
  • Senior leader
  • Prefer not to say
Q10
메시지

Thank you for the thoughtful feedback. Your ratings and comments will be summarized alongside other feedback for this person to support their development conversation.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines structured rating questions (matrix of collaboration/reliability/communication habits, opinion scale, best-worst ranking of strengths) with an AI follow-up interview that asks the respondent to walk through one specific, recent example behind their ratings.
  • Turns generic scores into evidence: the AI interview probes for a concrete situation, so reports include real examples rather than just numbers.
  • Includes role-level context (optional) so feedback patterns can be checked against seniority, plus a closing message setting expectations that responses will be summarized for the colleague.
  • Auto-generates a report from the combined rating and interview data, removing manual write-up work for whoever compiles peer feedback.

Jotform

Peer Feedback Forms

A template gallery page offering multiple static peer feedback form layouts that can be customized with Jotform's form builder. Good for quick deployment and integrates with Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it's a fixed-question form rather than an interview-style survey. No mention of follow-up probing or automated scoring of open responses.

잘하는 점

  • Multiple ready-made form layouts to choose from
  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Can embed in existing workflows/integrations Jotform supports

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questions to get at specifics behind a rating
  • No automated quality scoring of open-text responses
  • No published methodology for how questions were designed or validated

SurveyMonkey

Workplace Peer Feedback Template

A single ready-to-use peer feedback survey template built for SurveyMonkey's platform, with standard rating and open-text questions. It benefits from SurveyMonkey's reporting dashboards and distribution tools, but the question set is fixed at send-time with no dynamic branching based on individual answers. There's no voice-based or interview component.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established survey distribution and analytics tools
  • Simple, familiar rating-scale question format for respondents
  • Quick to launch as a fielding-ready template

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into specific examples behind ratings
  • No voice AI interview option
  • No automated per-response quality scoring of open-ended answers

Typeform

Peer Feedback Form Template

A conversational-style, fielding-ready form template using Typeform's one-question-at-a-time UI, which makes it feel more personal than a typical grid form. It still relies on pre-set questions rather than any AI-driven follow-up, and reporting is limited to Typeform's standard results summaries.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time interface
  • Fielding-ready template that's quick to publish
  • Good completion-friendly design for shorter feedback forms

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to probe for concrete examples
  • No automated quality scoring of responses
  • No transparent, published prompt/methodology behind question design

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기