Field Trip Experience Feedback Survey
Measures how well a school, museum, or organizational field trip delivered on learning value, logistics, and safety, gathered from teachers, chaperones, and parents — with an AI follow-up that reconstructs the specific moment the trip clicked or fell apart instead of relying on a single satisfaction score.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Overall, how would you rate this field trip?
How would you rate each part of the trip?
- Pre-trip communication
- Transportation logistics
- Educational value of the destination
- Safety and supervision
- Value for the cost
Which part of the trip did participants seem most engaged with?
- Guided tour or presentation
- Hands-on activity or workshop
- Free exploration time
- Group discussion or debrief
- Nothing stood out
Rank these factors by how much they matter for planning the next field trip, most important first.
- Transportation arrangements
- Itinerary pacing
- Group size
- Cost per participant
- Alignment with learning goals
How likely are you to recommend this trip to other classes or groups next year?
Reconstruct the single moment that most shaped this respondent's overall rating — ask them to describe exactly what happened, where, and why it stood out, whether positive or negative. If their recommendation score was low, probe what specifically would need to change for them to recommend the trip next time; if high, probe whether that moment could be intentionally recreated on future trips.
What's one specific change that would make the next field trip better?
Which best describes your role on this trip?
- Teacher or educator
- Chaperone
- Parent or guardian
- Student
- Other staff
- Prefer not to say
What grade level or age group were the trip participants?
- Early elementary (K-2)
- Upper elementary (3-5)
- Middle school (6-8)
- High school (9-12)
- College or adult group
- Prefer not to say
Thanks so much for your feedback! Responses across chaperones, teachers, and parents will be combined into a report used to plan and improve future field trips.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment the trip clicked or fell apart, going beyond a single satisfaction score
- Combines quantitative ratings (overall opinion scale, matrix breakdown by trip component, recommendation likelihood) with open-ended and ranking questions for planning priorities
- Separates respondent context (role on trip, grade/age level) so feedback from teachers, chaperones, and parents can be compared meaningfully
- Auto-generates a report from all responses without requiring manual tallying of matrix or ranking data
QuestionPro
Field trip survey questions in a sample survey templateThis is a sample set of field trip survey questions presented as a static template within QuestionPro's broader survey platform. It covers standard satisfaction and logistics questions but is offered as a fixed question list rather than an adaptive interview experience. Useful as a starting question bank, though it requires manual customization for role-specific feedback (teacher vs. chaperone vs. parent).
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with broad question-type support (ratings, multiple choice, etc.)
- Provides a ready reference list of field-trip-relevant questions
- Backed by QuestionPro's general reporting and analytics tools
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up to probe why a rating was given or reconstruct a specific moment
- No voice AI interview option
- No published methodology for how responses are scored or weighted
SurveySparrow
Field Trip Survey TemplateSurveySparrow offers a conversational-style field trip questionnaire template, which is closer to fielding-ready than a plain form but still relies on pre-set question flows rather than dynamic AI-driven probing. It's built for general education feedback collection and includes SurveySparrow's typical chat-like survey UI. No indication of voice interviews or automated per-response quality scoring.
잘하는 점
- Conversational survey format that may feel more engaging than a plain form
- Education-focused template tailored to field trip contexts
- Part of a platform with broader survey distribution and reporting features
아쉬운 점
- Lacks an adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into the specific moment that shaped a respondent's rating
- No voice AI interview capability
- No transparent, published prompt-level methodology for how feedback is interpreted
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.