QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Leadership Alignment on AI Strategy Pulse Check

A short pulse check for executive and senior leadership teams that surfaces where AI strategy is genuinely shared versus quietly contested — covering clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage. An AI follow-up interview digs into the specific decision or disagreement behind the lowest-rated alignment statement instead of settling for a vague 'somewhat aligned' score.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to weigh in on where our leadership team stands on AI strategy. This pulse check covers priorities, resourcing, and confidence — about 6 minutes. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. Your honest view, even where it differs from others', is what makes this useful.

Q02
의견 척도필수

How clear is our organization's AI strategy to you personally?

척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not clear at all최대:Completely clear
Q03
매트릭스필수

How much do you agree with each of the following statements about our leadership team's alignment on AI?

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Leadership agrees on the top 2-3 AI use cases to prioritize
  • We've allocated sufficient budget to execute our AI plans
  • Roles and decision rights for AI initiatives are clear
  • We have a shared view of acceptable AI risk and governance
  • Leadership communicates a consistent AI narrative to the rest of the organization
열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree
Q04
최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)필수

Which of these AI investment areas matter most for our strategy right now?

  • Customer experience & engagement
  • Internal productivity & automation
  • New product or revenue innovation
  • Risk, compliance & governance
  • Talent capability & AI literacy
  • Data & infrastructure readiness
  • Competitive differentiation
세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Most important now최악:Least important now
Q05
점수 배분필수

If you had 100 points of budget to allocate across these AI-related priorities for the next 12 months, how would you split them?

  • Customer-facing AI products/features
  • Internal productivity & automation tools
  • Data & infrastructure investment
  • Risk, compliance & governance
  • Talent, training & change management
100점 배분
Q06
객관식필수

Which best describes our organization's current stage of AI adoption?

  • Exploring / early pilots only
  • Scaling a few proven use cases
  • AI embedded in core workflows
  • Still mostly conceptual / no active projects
  • Not sure
Q07
평점 척도필수

How confident are you that we'll achieve our stated AI strategy goals in the next 12 months?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Not at all confident최대:Extremely confident
Q08
객관식필수

What's the biggest barrier to better leadership alignment on AI right now? (Select up to two)

  • Unclear or competing business priorities
  • Insufficient budget or resources
  • Unclear ownership / decision rights
  • Gaps in AI skills or literacy on the leadership team
  • Data or technical readiness
  • Differing risk tolerance across leaders
  • Lack of a shared success metric
Q09
AI 인터뷰

Identify which alignment statement the respondent rated lowest and probe concretely: what specific decision, budget line, or use case is leadership actually disagreeing about, who holds the opposing view, and how it connects to the barrier they selected. If they rated everything highly, stress-test that by asking for a recent example where leadership's AI priorities visibly conflicted. Close by asking what decision needs to get made in the next 30 days to move alignment forward.

Q10
장문형

What is the one decision our leadership team needs to make about AI in the next quarter that we keep avoiding or delaying?

Q11
객관식

Which best describes your role level?

  • C-suite / executive leadership
  • Senior VP / VP
  • Director
  • Senior manager
  • Other leadership role
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
객관식

Which function do you primarily represent?

  • Technology / Engineering
  • Product
  • Operations
  • Finance
  • Marketing / Sales
  • HR / People
  • Legal / Risk / Compliance
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q13
메시지

Thanks for your candid input. Responses are aggregated into a leadership alignment report — no individual answers are attributed by name — to help focus our next AI strategy conversation.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

이 템플릿의 설계 목적을 소개합니다. 다른 설문 도구에서는 직접 비교할 만한 템플릿을 찾지 못했습니다.

차별화 포인트

  • Goes beyond generic leadership check-ins by focusing specifically on AI strategy: clarity, priorities, budget trade-offs, and adoption stage, using a matrix, max-diff, and constant-sum allocation to surface real trade-off thinking, not just satisfaction scores
  • Pinpoints the exact alignment statement each respondent rated lowest and runs an AI follow-up interview that probes the specific decision or disagreement behind it, instead of stopping at a vague 'somewhat aligned' number
  • Segments results by role level and function so leadership can see whether misalignment is company-wide or concentrated in specific groups, alongside an open question forcing respondents to name the one AI decision leadership must make next
  • Automatically aggregates responses into a leadership alignment report, saving the manual synthesis work that static survey exports require

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기