Enterprise WTP & Adoption Drivers for Low-Carbon Software
Surveys enterprise software buyers to measure demand, willingness to pay, and key adoption barriers for low-carbon software. Identifies price sensitivity thresholds and ESG procurement priorities across industries and organization sizes.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which of the following best describes your involvement in software purchasing decisions for your organization?
- I am a final decision-maker
- I am part of the buying committee
- I recommend or influence vendors
- I approve budgets for software purchases
- I have no involvement in software purchasing
How satisfied are you with the sustainability information currently provided by software vendors?
How interested is your organization in choosing a greener software option when functionality is comparable to alternatives?
Assuming equal functionality and performance, what is the maximum price premium your organization would pay for a materially greener software option?
- 0% — would not pay any premium
- 1–5%
- 6–10%
- 11–15%
- 16–20%
- More than 20%
- Unsure
Please rank the following drivers of greener software adoption from most to least important for your organization over the next 12–24 months.
- New or tightening environmental regulations
- Internal ESG or sustainability targets
- Customer or partner contractual requirements
- Demonstrable cost savings or efficiency gains
- Competitive differentiation in the market
- Employee expectations around sustainability
Based on your responses in this survey, please share any additional thoughts on how green criteria factor into your software procurement decisions, or what would most increase your likelihood to choose greener software.
Approximately how many employees does your organization have?
- Fewer than 200
- 200–999
- 1,000–4,999
- 5,000–19,999
- 20,000 or more
- Prefer not to say
You've reached the end of the survey. Thank you for sharing your insights — your responses will help advance research on sustainable software procurement. Please submit your responses now.
Thank you for your interest. This survey is designed for professionals involved in software purchasing decisions. Based on your response, you are not eligible for this study. We appreciate your time.
Which of the following have been barriers to purchasing greener software in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Lack of standardized carbon or sustainability metrics
- Higher cost of greener alternatives
- Limited availability of greener vendor options
- Insufficient executive or leadership buy-in
- No regulatory or compliance requirement to do so
- Concerns about performance or reliability trade-offs
- Greener software not a current organizational priority
- Other (please specify)
- None of the above
How likely is your organization to actively evaluate greener software alternatives in the next 12 months?
What payback timeframe would your organization expect to recoup any premium paid for greener software?
- Immediate (would not pay a premium)
- Less than 12 months
- 12–24 months
- 25–36 months
- More than 36 months
- Unsure
We'd like to explore your thoughts on greener software decisions in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions based on your responses.
What is your organization's primary industry?
- Technology
- Financial services
- Manufacturing
- Retail / Consumer goods
- Healthcare
- Energy / Utilities
- Public sector
- Education
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Please rank the following from most to least important in terms of where the value of greener software comes from for your organization.
- Reduced carbon emissions and environmental impact
- Cost savings from improved efficiency
- Regulatory and compliance readiness
- Customer or partner sustainability requirements
- Brand and reputation benefits
- Employee engagement and talent attraction
Where is your organization primarily headquartered?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East
- Africa
- Prefer not to say
To what extent would your organization accept minor performance trade-offs in order to reduce software-related carbon emissions?
What is your role level within your organization?
- Executive (C-suite / VP)
- Director
- Manager
- Individual contributor
- Consultant / Contractor
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Approximately how much does your organization spend annually on software across all categories?
- Less than $1M
- $1M–$4.9M
- $5M–$19.9M
- $20M–$99.9M
- $100M or more
- Unsure
- Prefer not to say
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Combines quantitative measures (opinion scales on satisfaction with current sustainability disclosures, interest and likelihood to evaluate greener alternatives, tolerance for performance trade-offs) with ranking questions on value drivers and adoption drivers, plus dropdowns capturing maximum price premium and expected payback timeframe
- Segments responses by firmographics — employee count, industry, HQ region, role level, and software spend — enabling cross-tab analysis of price sensitivity and ESG priorities
- Includes an AI follow-up interview segment that probes the qualitative reasoning behind a respondent's stated WTP and barriers, going beyond what a static questionnaire can capture
- Closes with an open-text reflection question and automated end-to-end reporting, so nuanced procurement rationale isn't lost between the scaled questions
QuestionPro
20 Software Evaluation Survey Questions + Sample Questionnaire TemplateThis is a general software evaluation content guide with a sample questionnaire, not a purpose-built survey for enterprise WTP or ESG procurement drivers. It's useful as a reference for general software vendor evaluation criteria but isn't focused on low-carbon software, price sensitivity thresholds, or sustainability procurement priorities. Best read as an educational article rather than a fielding-ready instrument for this specific research question.
잘하는 점
- Covers broad software evaluation criteria like usability, features, and support that could be adapted
- Provides a sample questionnaire structure as a starting point
- Backed by an established survey platform with wide question-type support
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up interviews — questions are static text with no dynamic probing
- No focus on sustainability, ESG procurement, or willingness-to-pay pricing thresholds
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated insight reporting
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.