Q01
메시지
모든 템플릿
Hybrid Work Arrangement & Collaboration Pulse
A pulse survey measuring how hybrid and flexible work arrangements affect collaboration effectiveness, productivity, scheduling equity, and manager support. Designed for HR and workplace strategy teams to identify arrangement-preference gaps and fairness concerns across distributed workforces.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
질문 22개 · 약 10분
Q02
객관식
Which of the following best describes your current work arrangement?
- Fully remote
- Mostly remote (3–4 days remote per week)
- Hybrid balanced (2–3 days onsite per week)
- Mostly onsite (3–4 days onsite per week)
- Fully onsite
- Varies by season or project
Q03
의견 척도
In the past 4 weeks, cross-team collaboration has been effective.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q04
의견 척도
Our organization's guidelines on remote and hybrid work arrangements are clear.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q05
장문형
Please share any fairness concerns you have related to work location or scheduling.
Q06
객관식
Are you a people manager?
- Yes
- No
- Prefer not to say
Q07
메시지
Thank you for completing this survey. Your feedback will directly inform how we shape our hybrid work practices. Results will be shared in aggregate with leadership.
Q08
객관식
Which work arrangement would you prefer most of the time?
- Fully remote
- Mostly remote (3–4 days remote per week)
- Hybrid balanced (2–3 days onsite per week)
- Mostly onsite (3–4 days onsite per week)
- Fully onsite
- Depends on project or team needs
Q09
의견 척도
My manager effectively balances flexibility with team coordination.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q10
의견 척도
Opportunities for career advancement are equally available regardless of work location.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q11
장문형
What one change would most improve the balance between flexibility and collaboration for you and your team?
Q12
객관식
What is your employment type?
- Full-time
- Part-time
- Contractor
- Intern
- Prefer not to say
Q13
의견 척도
How closely does your current work arrangement match your preference?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Not at all closely최대:Very closely
Q14
드롭다운
Approximately what percentage of your work requires overlapping hours with colleagues?
- 0–10%
- 11–25%
- 26–50%
- 51–75%
- 76–100%
- Not sure
Q15
의견 척도
Remote and onsite employees are included equally in important decisions and discussions.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q16
AI 인터뷰
We'd like to explore your experience with hybrid work and collaboration a bit further. Please share your thoughts, and our AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions.
Q17
객관식
How long have you been with the organization?
- Less than 6 months
- 6–12 months
- 1–2 years
- 3–5 years
- 6+ years
- Prefer not to say
Q18
의견 척도
Overall, how does your current work arrangement affect your productivity?
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Very negatively최대:Very positively
Q19
객관식
What daily overlap window best supports your team's collaboration?
- No set overlap needed
- About 2 hours
- About 3 hours
- About 4 hours
- 5+ hours
- Not sure
Q20
의견 척도
Performance evaluations at our organization are fair regardless of work arrangement.
척도: 1 – 7
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q21
드롭다운
In which country or region are you primarily based?
- North America
- Europe
- Asia-Pacific
- Latin America
- Middle East & Africa
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Q22
순위 매기기
When scheduling shared team time, please rank the following priorities from most to least important.
- Customer responsiveness
- Project deadlines
- Individual well-being
- Time zone inclusion
- Minimal after-hours impact
- Focus time protection
드래그하여 순위 지정
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Directly measures the arrangement-preference gap by pairing a current-arrangement question with a preferred-arrangement question and a match-closeness scale, rather than just capturing arrangement type.
- Includes a dedicated fairness and equity block (career advancement, inclusion in decisions, and performance evaluation fairness by work location) plus an open-text question specifically inviting fairness concerns.
- Uses a ranking exercise to surface scheduling-equity tradeoffs (how teams prioritize shared time) and a dropdown/overlap-window pair to quantify collaboration overlap needs.
- Adds an AI follow-up interview segment to probe hybrid collaboration experiences in participants' own words, then auto-generates a report — capabilities static form builders don't offer.
Jotform
Remote or Hybrid Working Arrangement Form TemplateThis is a static, fielding-ready form for capturing employee remote/hybrid work arrangement preferences, likely used for HR intake or scheduling requests rather than pulse-style measurement. It's easy to customize and deploy quickly within Jotform's broader form ecosystem, but it reads as an intake form rather than a survey designed to measure collaboration effectiveness or fairness perceptions over time.
잘하는 점
- Quick to deploy and customize using Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder
- Fits naturally into Jotform's wider suite of integrations and automation tools
- Simple, familiar format for straightforward arrangement data collection
아쉬운 점
- Static form with fixed questions — no adaptive AI follow-up probing based on individual responses
- No built-in fairness/equity scoring, scheduling-priority ranking, or automated analysis of collaboration effectiveness
- No transparent methodology or automated report generation comparable to QuestionPunk's per-response scoring and reporting
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.