Team Building Activity Impact & Culture Survey
Measures whether your team-building activities actually strengthen trust, communication, and belonging — and which formats are worth repeating versus retiring. Includes prioritization and budget-allocation exercises for planning future events, plus an AI follow-up interview that digs into the specific moment that most changed how someone works with their teammates.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
Which of the following team-building activities have you participated in during the last 6 months?
- Offsite retreat or multi-day trip
- In-office happy hour or social event
- Volunteering or community service project
- Escape room, scavenger hunt, or similar challenge
- Virtual game or online social event
- Skill-building workshop or training retreat
Thinking about the most recent team-building activity you attended, how much did it strengthen your working relationships with teammates?
How much do you agree with each statement about your team right now?
- My team communicates openly with each other
- I trust my teammates to follow through on commitments
- I feel a genuine sense of belonging on this team
- Recent team-building activities reflected what our team actually needs
Overall, how satisfied are you with the team-building efforts at your organization?
From the activity types below, which would you most want us to do more of, and which would you most want us to do less of?
- Escape rooms or puzzle challenges
- Volunteering or community service projects
- Multi-day offsite retreats
- Virtual games or online happy hours
- Skill-building workshops
- Sports or fitness challenges
- Team meals or social outings
- Trust-building exercises (e.g., ropes courses)
If you had 100 points to allocate across next year's team-building budget, how would you split it across these categories?
- In-person offsite retreats
- Local in-office activities
- Virtual/remote-friendly events
- Volunteering or community service
- Team meals and informal socials
If a fully optional team-building event were scheduled next month, how likely would you be to attend?
Reconstruct the specific moment from the respondent's most recent team-building activity that most changed (or failed to change) how they work with teammates — what happened, who was involved, and what made it stick or fall flat. If they rated the activity's impact low or said they'd attend nothing in the future, probe what would need to be different for them to see it as worth their time rather than an obligation.
Which department or function are you part of?
- Engineering
- Sales
- Marketing
- Customer Support
- Operations
- Prefer not to say
How long have you been on your current team?
- Less than 6 months
- 6 months to 1 year
- 1-3 years
- 3-5 years
- More than 5 years
- Prefer not to say
How large is your immediate team?
- 2-5 people
- 6-10 people
- 11-20 people
- More than 20 people
- Prefer not to say
Thanks so much for sharing this — it genuinely helps. Your answers will feed directly into next quarter's team-building plan so future activities feel less like an obligation and more like time well spent.
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Includes an AI follow-up interview that reconstructs the specific moment from a respondent's most recent team-building activity that changed how they work with teammates — something a static form can't probe into
- Combines a matrix question on trust/communication/belonging with a max-diff and constant-sum budget-allocation exercise, so results directly inform which activity formats to keep, retire, or fund next year
- Opens and closes with plain-language chat messages that set context and explain how responses feed into decisions, plus demographic filters (department, tenure, team size) for segmenting results
- Pairs quantitative satisfaction and likelihood-to-attend scales with qualitative depth from the AI interview, then auto-generates a report instead of leaving analysis to the user
Jotform
Team Building Questionnaire Form TemplateA straightforward, customizable form builder template for collecting feedback on team-building activities. It's fielding-ready and easy to embed or share, but it's a static question set with no adaptive follow-up or scoring logic. Good for basic feedback collection rather than deep impact analysis.
잘하는 점
- Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
- Fielding-ready template that can be deployed quickly
- Wide range of field types and integrations typical of Jotform
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI follow-up questioning — all respondents see the same static questions
- No built-in prioritization or budget-allocation exercise for planning future activities
- No automated per-response quality scoring or auto-generated analysis report
SurveyMonkey
Team Building Survey Template & QuestionsA methodologically solid, ready-to-field survey template backed by SurveyMonkey's established question library and analytics dashboard. It covers standard satisfaction and participation questions but relies on fixed-choice and scale items rather than any conversational probing. Reporting is dashboard-based rather than a synthesized narrative report.
잘하는 점
- Established survey platform with strong analytics and benchmarking dashboards
- Fielding-ready template with proven question design practices
- Broad distribution options (email, link, embed)
아쉬운 점
- No adaptive AI interview to explore the 'why' behind a rating or the specific moments that shaped it
- No native prioritization/max-diff or budget-allocation exercise in this template
- No transparent, inspectable prompt methodology since there's no AI-driven questioning
SurveySparrow
Team Building Questionnaire TemplateA conversational-style survey template that presents questions one at a time for a more engaging respondent experience. It's fielding-ready and covers core team-building feedback topics, but the conversational format is scripted rather than adaptive — it doesn't generate new questions based on what a respondent says. No dedicated budget-allocation or prioritization exercise is evident.
잘하는 점
- Conversational, one-question-at-a-time UI that can improve completion rates
- Fielding-ready template geared specifically at employee/team feedback
- Part of a broader survey platform with reporting features
아쉬운 점
- Conversational format is pre-scripted, not adaptive — it can't dynamically follow up based on a specific answer the way an AI interview can
- No prioritization or budget-allocation exercise for planning future team-building spend
- No published per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt methodology
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.