모든 템플릿

Remote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey

Measures remote and hybrid employees' experiences across tools, collaboration, productivity, and well-being to identify friction points and prioritize workplace improvements.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 29개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome to the Remote & Hybrid Work Experience Survey. This confidential survey takes approximately 13 minutes and asks about your remote work experience over the last 30 days. Your responses are anonymous and will be reported only in aggregate to help improve our remote work practices. Participation is entirely voluntary — you may skip any question or stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers; we simply want your honest perspective.

Q02
드롭다운

Over the last 30 days, approximately what share of your workdays were remote?

  • 0% (I worked onsite only)
  • 1–25%
  • 26–50%
  • 51–75%
  • 76–99%
  • 100% (fully remote)
Q03
메시지

The following questions ask you to rate different aspects of your remote setup. Please respond based on your experience over the last 30 days.

Q04
의견 척도

How effective was team collaboration on remote days?

척도: 17
최소:Very ineffective최대:Very effective
Q05
의견 척도

How would you rate your personal productivity on remote days compared to onsite days?

척도: 17
최소:Much lower최대:Much higher
Q06
의견 척도

How easy was it to disconnect from work at the end of the day on remote days?

척도: 15
최소:Very difficult최대:Very easy
Q07
의견 척도

Overall, how satisfied are you with your remote or hybrid work experience at this company?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q08
드롭다운

What is your primary job function?

  • Engineering/IT
  • Product/Design
  • Operations
  • Sales/Marketing
  • Customer Support/Success
  • HR/People
  • Finance/Legal
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q09
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used to improve our remote and hybrid work practices. If you have any questions, please contact [survey administrator].

Q10
의견 척도

How would you rate the reliability and speed of your internet connection on remote days?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q11
객관식

Which collaboration tools did you actively use on remote days? Select all that apply.

  • Slack or Microsoft Teams
  • Zoom, Google Meet, or Webex
  • Asana, Jira, or Trello
  • Confluence, Notion, or SharePoint
  • Online whiteboards (Miro, Mural, FigJam)
  • Email
  • Other
  • None of the above
Q12
의견 척도

How often did unclear priorities or goals slow you down on remote days?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q13
의견 척도

How would you rate your overall sense of connection to your team on remote days?

척도: 17
최소:Very disconnected최대:Very connected
Q14
장문형

Based on your responses throughout this survey, what is the single most important change that would improve your remote work experience?

Q15
드롭다운

How long have you been with the company?

  • Less than 6 months
  • 6–12 months
  • 1–2 years
  • 3–5 years
  • 6+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q16
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of your video conferencing tools (e.g., Zoom, Teams, Meet)?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q17
드롭다운

On a typical remote day, roughly how many meetings did you have?

  • 0 meetings
  • 1–2
  • 3–4
  • 5–6
  • 7 or more
Q18
의견 척도

How often did waiting for responses from colleagues slow you down on remote days?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q19
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to explore your experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions about your remote work.

Q20
드롭다운

What region best describes your primary work time zone?

  • Americas
  • EMEA
  • APAC
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q21
의견 척도

How would you rate the quality of your messaging and collaboration tools (e.g., Slack, Teams chat)?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q22
의견 척도

To what extent were your remote meetings efficient and productive?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all최대:To a great extent
Q23
의견 척도

How often did technical issues (slow tools, outages, VPN problems) slow you down on remote days?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q24
드롭다운

Are you a people manager?

  • Yes
  • No
  • Prefer not to say
Q25
의견 척도

How would you rate the reliability of your VPN or remote-access setup?

척도: 17
최소:Very poor최대:Excellent
Q26
의견 척도

How often did excessive or unproductive meetings slow you down on remote days?

척도: 15
최소:Never최대:Very often
Q27
객관식

Which hardware or environment factors created friction on remote days? Select all that apply.

  • Laptop performance
  • External monitor(s) setup
  • Webcam or microphone
  • Headset or audio quality
  • VPN or authentication device
  • Ergonomics (desk/chair)
  • Power or internet reliability
  • None of the above
Q28
순위 매기기

Rank the following improvements by how much they would help your remote work experience. Place the most helpful at the top.

  1. Better equipment stipend
  2. Faster VPN/network
  3. Fewer or shorter meetings
  4. Clearer goals and roadmaps
  5. Training on remote tools
  6. Dedicated focus-time norms
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q29
장문형

Were there any tools that felt missing, redundant, or difficult to use on remote days? Please describe.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Goes beyond static ratings with an AI follow-up interview that lets employees elaborate on friction points in their own words, with fully transparent prompts.
  • Separates remote-day experience into distinct dimensions (connectivity, video/collab tools, VPN, meeting efficiency, disconnection, team connection) rather than a single generic satisfaction score.
  • Includes a ranking exercise for prioritizing improvements plus an open-text 'most important thing' question, giving both quantified priorities and qualitative context automatically summarized in a report.
  • Captures role, tenure, manager status, and time zone as segmentation variables so results can be sliced by team/manager without extra setup.

Jotform

Remote or Hybrid Working Arrangement Form

This is primarily a working-arrangement request/agreement form rather than an experience-measurement survey, so its content focus differs from ours. It's built on Jotform's drag-and-drop form builder, useful for HR logistics documentation but not designed to probe productivity, collaboration, or well-being. Best treated as a related-but-different use case rather than a direct competitor to an experience survey.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's form builder
  • Likely integrates with Jotform's broader HR form ecosystem (e-signatures, approvals)
  • Familiar, widely-used platform for quick deployment

아쉬운 점

  • Static form fields only — no adaptive follow-up questioning to probe 'why' behind responses
  • Not focused on measuring experience/friction across tools, collaboration, and well-being like a dedicated experience survey
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or AI-generated report

SurveyMonkey

Remote Workforce Engagement Survey Template

A ready-to-field template aimed at gauging remote employee engagement, comparable in intent to our survey. SurveyMonkey brings strong analytics and benchmarking tools on the back end. However, it's built from static question types without adaptive probing into individual answers.

잘하는 점

  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's established analytics and reporting dashboards
  • Large template library suggests easy customization for engagement-specific angles
  • Widely recognized platform likely to have high respondent familiarity/trust

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into open-ended friction points
  • No voice AI interview option or guided screen-share tasks
  • Methodology and question-generation logic aren't published as transparent prompts

SurveySparrow

Remote Employee Engagement Survey Template

A fielding-ready survey template focused on remote employee engagement, filed under SurveySparrow's COVID-19-era template category. It's conversational in UI style but still relies on fixed question sequences rather than dynamic AI-driven probing. Good for a quick engagement pulse-check rather than deep root-cause analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey UI that may improve completion rates
  • Purpose-built for remote employee engagement context
  • Likely supports basic branching logic within SurveySparrow's platform

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI interview or voice AI option to explore individual responses further
  • Template is older (COVID-19-era category), so question set may not reflect current hybrid-work norms
  • No automated quality scoring of individual responses or AI-synthesized report

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.