모든 템플릿

Pairwise Feature Trade-Off Preference Survey

Measures consumer feature preferences through forced-choice pairwise comparisons, attribute importance rankings, and purchase intent for portable consumer electronics. Designed for market researchers seeking to identify which product attributes most influence buying decisions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 27개 · 약 12분
Q01
메시지

Welcome and thank you for participating in this research study. This survey asks you to compare pairs of product options and tell us which you prefer. It takes approximately 12 minutes to complete. • Your participation is entirely voluntary—you may stop at any time. • There are no right or wrong answers; we are interested in your genuine opinions. • All responses are confidential, anonymized, and reported only in aggregate. • Results will be used for internal product research purposes. By continuing, you agree to participate under these conditions.

Q02
객관식

Which of the following portable gadgets have you purchased or seriously considered purchasing in the past 12 months? Select all that apply.

  • Wireless headphones or earbuds
  • Portable power bank
  • Bluetooth speaker
  • Fitness tracker or smartwatch
  • Portable charger/cable kit
  • None of the above
Q03
메시지

<p><strong>Trade-off 1 — Price vs. Battery Life</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> $29 — 8-hour battery life — 1-year warranty — Standard build</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> $49 — 20-hour battery life — 1-year warranty — Standard build</p>

Q04
순위 매기기

Rank the following product attributes from most important to least important when choosing a portable gadget.

  1. Price
  2. Battery life
  3. Durability / build quality
  4. Brand reputation
  5. Warranty length
  6. Eco / sustainability rating
  7. Feature set
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q05
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I prioritize long-term reliability over getting the lowest price.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q06
장문형

Based on the trade-offs you evaluated, is there anything else you'd like to share about how you make product decisions?

Q07
객관식

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help us understand what matters most in everyday gadget choices. You may now close this window.

Q09
메시지

In this survey, you will compare pairs of portable gadget options and select the one you would most likely buy today. If neither stands out, you may choose 'No preference.' Imagine you are shopping for an everyday portable gadget such as wireless headphones or a power bank. Each option differs on specific attributes like price, battery life, or warranty.

Q10
객관식

Trade-off 1: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — Lower price ($29), shorter battery (8 hrs)
  • Option B — Higher price ($49), longer battery (20 hrs)
  • No preference
Q11
의견 척도

How likely are you to purchase a portable gadget like this in the next 3 months?

척도: 17
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q12
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: I am willing to pay more for products with strong environmental credentials.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q13
AI 인터뷰

We'd like to understand your decision-making process a bit more. An AI moderator will ask a couple of follow-up questions about the trade-offs you evaluated.

Q14
객관식

Which gender do you identify with?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
메시지

<p><strong>Trade-off 2 — Brand Reputation vs. Eco Rating</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> Well-known brand — Standard eco rating — $39 — 12-hour battery</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> Lesser-known brand — Top eco rating — $39 — 12-hour battery</p>

Q16
객관식

If you are unlikely to purchase soon, what is the primary reason?

  • Budget constraints
  • My current product is still sufficient
  • Unsure which brand or model to trust
  • Waiting for a sale or better deal
  • Available features don't meet my needs
  • Environmental or sustainability concerns
  • Not applicable — I am likely to purchase
Q17
의견 척도

To what extent do you agree or disagree: Brand reputation is more important to me than product specifications.

척도: 17
최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree
Q18
드롭다운

In which country or region do you currently reside?

  • United States
  • United Kingdom
  • Canada
  • Australia
  • India
  • Germany
  • France
  • Netherlands
  • Other
Q19
객관식

Trade-off 2: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — Well-known brand, standard eco rating
  • Option B — Lesser-known brand, top eco rating
  • No preference
Q20
드롭다운

What is the most you would be willing to pay for the portable gadget option you most preferred?

  • Less than $20
  • $20–$29
  • $30–$39
  • $40–$49
  • $50–$69
  • $70–$99
  • $100 or more
Q21
객관식

What is the highest level of education you have completed?

  • Some high school or less
  • High school diploma or equivalent
  • Some college / Associate degree
  • Bachelor's degree
  • Postgraduate degree
  • Prefer not to say
Q22
메시지

<p><strong>Trade-off 3 — Durability vs. Feature Set</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> Rugged, water-resistant build — Basic feature set — $39 — 12-hour battery</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> Standard build — Advanced features (noise cancelling, app integration) — $39 — 12-hour battery</p>

Q23
객관식

What is your current employment status?

  • Employed full-time
  • Employed part-time
  • Self-employed
  • Student
  • Homemaker / Caregiver
  • Retired
  • Not currently employed
  • Prefer not to say
Q24
객관식

Trade-off 3: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — Rugged build, basic features
  • Option B — Standard build, advanced features
  • No preference
Q25
메시지

<p><strong>Trade-off 4 — Warranty Length vs. Price</strong></p><p><strong>Option A:</strong> 2-year warranty — $45 — 12-hour battery — Standard build</p><p><strong>Option B:</strong> 6-month warranty — $30 — 12-hour battery — Standard build</p>

Q26
객관식

Trade-off 4: Which option would you choose today?

  • Option A — 2-year warranty, higher price ($45)
  • Option B — 6-month warranty, lower price ($30)
  • No preference
Q27
객관식

If any of the trade-off choices above felt difficult, what was the main reason?

  • Both options seemed similar in value
  • The attributes weren't important to me
  • I needed more information to decide
  • Price differences overshadowed other factors
  • I didn't find it difficult to choose

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes four explicit pairwise trade-off scenarios (price vs. battery life, brand vs. eco rating, durability vs. feature set, warranty vs. price) rather than generic feature-rating questions
  • Pairs forced-choice trade-offs with a ranking task for attribute importance and a purchase-intent opinion scale plus willingness-to-pay dropdown, giving both relative and absolute preference data
  • Adds an AI-moderated follow-up interview segment that probes respondents on their decision-making process behind the trade-offs they just made — something static form tools cannot do
  • Runs on QuestionPunk, so responses get automated per-response quality scoring and an auto-generated report, with transparent, inspectable AI prompts

Jotform

Consumer Preference Survey Form Template

A general-purpose consumer preference form built on Jotform's drag-and-drop builder, aimed at capturing broad likes/dislikes rather than structured pairwise trade-offs. It's a customizable starting template, not a purpose-built forced-choice or conjoint-style instrument. Good for quick deployment but lacks the trade-off methodology market researchers need for attribute-weight analysis.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization
  • Broad template library for adaptation
  • Simple to deploy quickly for basic feedback collection

아쉬운 점

  • No structured pairwise/forced-choice trade-off logic evident
  • Static form with no adaptive AI follow-up questioning
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency since it isn't an AI-driven tool

SurveyMonkey

Product Feature Survey Template

A ready-to-field template focused on gathering feedback on individual product features, likely using rating and multiple-choice questions. It's built for general feature feedback rather than head-to-head trade-off comparisons or attribute-importance ranking. Solid for straightforward feature satisfaction surveys but not designed around forced trade-offs.

잘하는 점

  • Fielding-ready template on an established survey platform
  • Likely benefits from SurveyMonkey's benchmarking and analytics tools
  • Familiar, easy-to-answer format for respondents

아쉬운 점

  • No apparent pairwise/forced-choice trade-off structure for isolating attribute influence
  • Static question flow with no adaptive AI probing on respondent reasoning
  • No AI-generated report or transparent prompt methodology

SurveySparrow

Purchase Intent Survey Template

A conversational-style template focused specifically on purchase intent, which overlaps with one section of our survey but doesn't cover pairwise feature trade-offs or attribute-importance ranking. It's a fielding-ready template well-suited to intent measurement alone rather than a full trade-off/preference study.

잘하는 점

  • Chat-like conversational UI that may improve completion rates
  • Focused specifically on purchase intent metrics
  • Ready-to-use template requiring minimal setup

아쉬운 점

  • Narrower scope focused on intent, not trade-off or attribute-ranking analysis
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to explore reasoning behind answers
  • No automated per-response quality scoring or transparent AI prompt disclosure

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.