eDiscovery Platform Usability & Workflow Assessment
Evaluates e-discovery software usability, workflow pain points, and feature priorities across the EDRM lifecycle. Designed for legal professionals, litigation support teams, and legal operations who use e-discovery platforms on active matters.
샘플 질문
템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.
When did you last use an e-discovery tool on an actual matter?
- Today
- In the last 7 days
- 8–30 days ago
- 1–3 months ago
- 3–12 months ago
- More than a year ago
Which of the following best describes your primary role on matters involving e-discovery?
- In-house counsel
- Outside counsel
- Litigation support / e-discovery manager
- Paralegal / reviewer
- IT / legal operations
- Compliance / investigations
- Other
Rank the following e-discovery workflow steps by the amount of time you typically spend on each (drag the most time-consuming to the top).
- Data ingestion/processing
- Culling (deduplication, deNIST, date scoping)
- Search and filtering
- Document review
- Coding/tagging decisions
- Privilege/quality control
- Production/export packaging
Overall, how satisfied are you with your primary e-discovery tool's usability over the last 30 days?
Rank the following factors by how much they influence your e-discovery tool choice (drag the most important to the top).
- Speed and performance
- Search power and accuracy
- Ease of use for reviewers
- Privilege and QC capabilities
- Production and export reliability
- Analytics and AI features
- Total cost of ownership
- Security and compliance certifications
If you experienced a frustrating moment with your e-discovery tool in the last 90 days, please briefly describe what happened.
How many years have you worked with e-discovery tools?
- 0–1 years
- 2–4 years
- 5–9 years
- 10–14 years
- 15+ years
- Prefer not to say
Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses are confidential and will be used in aggregate to improve e-discovery tools and workflows. If you have any questions about this research, please contact the study team.
Which e-discovery platform do you use most often on active matters?
- Relativity
- Everlaw
- DISCO
- Logikcull
- Reveal / Brainspace
- Nuix
- Microsoft Purview eDiscovery (Premium)
- Other or mixed tools
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was data ingestion and processing in your primary tool?
How would you rate your primary tool's speed and performance during peak review periods in the last 30 days?
Rank the following potential improvements by how much they would help your team (drag the most helpful to the top).
- Faster performance at scale
- Smarter search (concepts/AI)
- Simpler reviewer interface
- Stronger privilege/QC tools
- Easier, more reliable productions
- Smoother integrations and data imports
Based on your responses in this survey, we'd like to explore your e-discovery experience in a bit more depth. An AI moderator will ask you a couple of follow-up questions.
What type of organization do you primarily work in?
- Law firm
- In-house legal department
- Government/regulator
- Consultancy/ALSP
- Corporate IT / Legal Operations
- Other
- Prefer not to say
During an active matter, how frequently do you use e-discovery tools?
- Multiple times a day
- Daily
- Several times a week
- Weekly
- Less than weekly
- Only at specific milestones
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was search and filtering in your primary tool?
How likely are you to recommend your primary e-discovery tool to a colleague?
If you could change one thing about your primary e-discovery tool, what would it be?
Approximately how many employees are in your organization?
- 1–10
- 11–50
- 51–200
- 201–1,000
- 1,001–5,000
- 5,001–20,000
- 20,001+
- Prefer not to say
Which matter types have you supported with e-discovery in the last 12 months? Select all that apply.
- Civil/commercial litigation
- Internal investigations
- Regulatory inquiries/response
- Arbitration
- Data subject access requests (DSARs)
- Compliance audits/monitoring
- M&A or due diligence
- Other
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was document review in your primary tool?
Which of the following issues did you encounter with your primary e-discovery tool in the last 60 days? Select all that apply.
- Slow page loads or timeouts
- Indexing or processing delays
- Search misses or inconsistent results
- Export/production failures
- Confusing error messages
- Tag/coding conflicts or overrides
- Permissions or access confusion
- Unexpected billing/usage spikes
- None of the above
In which region is your primary work location?
- North America
- Europe, Middle East, or Africa (EMEA)
- Asia-Pacific (APAC)
- Latin America
- Other
- Prefer not to say
Thinking about the last 60 days, how easy or difficult was production and export packaging in your primary tool?
How did you primarily learn to use your current e-discovery tool?
- Formal vendor training
- Internal training program
- Self-taught (docs/videos)
- Peer coaching/mentoring
- External consultant
- No formal training
Approximately how many people on your typical matter team use the e-discovery tool?
- 1–2
- 3–5
- 6–10
- 11–20
- 21–50
- 51+
- Varies significantly
포함된 기능
AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.
다른 서비스와 비교
다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.
이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유
- Purpose-built for the EDRM lifecycle, covering ingestion/processing, search/filtering, review, and production as distinct usability checkpoints rather than a single generic usability score
- Includes role, platform, matter-type, and organizational firmographic questions so results can be segmented by litigation support role, org type, and team size
- Combines structured opinion-scale, ranking, and multiple-choice questions with two open-text prompts and an AI follow-up interview that probes deeper into a respondent's specific frustrating moments and tool-change requests
- Pairs quantitative usability ratings (satisfaction, performance, recommend-likelihood) with qualitative detail on issues encountered and how users learned the tool, giving both benchmarking and narrative insight
QuestionPro
System Usability Scale Survey Template | Sample Survey, Examples, Questions & QuestionnairesThis is a generic, industry-agnostic System Usability Scale (SUS) template rather than anything built for e-discovery or legal workflows specifically. It's useful as a general usability-scoring instrument but would require heavy customization to capture EDRM-stage pain points, matter types, or platform-specific issues. It reads as a static questionnaire template rather than a fielding-ready, domain-specific assessment.
잘하는 점
- Based on the well-established, validated SUS methodology for measuring perceived usability
- Simple, short format that's easy to field quickly across any software product
- Produces a standardized usability score that's comparable across studies
아쉬운 점
- Not tailored to e-discovery workflows, EDRM stages, or legal-industry terminology
- Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe individual pain points or frustrating moments
- No mechanism for guided screen-share tasks, automated per-response quality scoring, or auto-generated reporting
설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?
이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.