Politician Statement Reaction & Credibility Survey

Captures how a specific statement from a public official lands with real people — whether they'd heard it, how they interpret it, and what it does to their trust. An AI follow-up interview digs into the reasoning behind each reaction, surfacing the specific words or context driving approval, skepticism, or backlash.

이 템플릿 사용하기 템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 13개 · 약 7분

Q01

메시지

Thanks for taking a few minutes to share your reaction to a recent statement made by a public official. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. There are no right answers — we want your honest, gut reaction. This takes about 5-6 minutes.

Q02

객관식필수

Before today, had you heard about this statement?

Yes, I saw or heard it directly (video, audio, or in person)
Yes, I heard about it secondhand (news, social media, friends)
No, this is the first I'm hearing of it

Q03

텍스트 하이라이트

Please read the statement below, then highlight any words or phrases that stand out to you — whether they strike you as compelling, concerning, vague, or anything else worth flagging.

"(Replace with the exact quote from the politician, including enough surrounding context to be fair.)" (Template note: paste the verbatim statement and cite the source/date before launching.)

Q04

의견 척도필수

How much do you agree with the sentiment expressed in this statement?

척도: 1 – 7

최소:Strongly disagree최대:Strongly agree

Q05

객관식필수

Which of these best describes how the statement came across to you?

Honest and straightforward
Somewhat exaggerated
Misleading
Taken out of context
Politically calculated
I'm not sure

Q06

평점 척도필수

How has this statement affected your trust in this politician?

범위: 1 – 5

최소:Much less trust최대:Much more trust

Q07

매트릭스

Thinking about the statement itself, how much do you agree with each of the following?

5개 행 × 5개 열

It was clear and easy to understand
It was honest
It was relevant to issues that matter to me
It was divisive
It was consistent with things this politician has said before

열: Strongly disagree · Disagree · Neutral · Agree · Strongly agree

Q08

최선·최악 선택형(MaxDiff)

When you form an opinion about a statement like this, which factors matter most to you?

Tone and delivery
Factual accuracy
Timing of the statement
Media coverage around it
How it compares to past statements from this politician
Reactions from other politicians or officials
How personally relevant it is to me

세트별 최선·최악 선택최선:Matters most to my opinion최악:Matters least to my opinion

Q09

AI 인터뷰

Explore the specific reasoning behind this respondent's reaction to the statement: which words or phrases from the highlighted passage drove their agreement or disagreement, and why. If they rated it as misleading or taken out of context, ask what context they think is missing. If they hadn't heard of the statement before this survey, probe their first impression now that they've read it and what would change their mind.

Q10

객관식

What, if anything, do you think this politician should do next?

Clarify what they meant
Apologize
Stand by the statement
Provide more context or evidence
Nothing needs to be done
Not sure

Q11

객관식

Which best describes your political affiliation?

Left-leaning
Center
Right-leaning
Independent / none
Prefer not to say

Q12

드롭다운

What is your age range?

18-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+
Prefer not to say

Q13

메시지

That's everything — thank you for your honest reactions. Your responses will be combined with others to build a picture of how this statement is landing with the public and where the biggest reactions are coming from.

포함된 기능

AI 후속 질문
정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.
주의력 확인 장치
성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.
AI가 작성한 문안
문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.
자동 리포트
응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

Opens by establishing prior awareness of the statement, then uses text highlighting to pinpoint the exact words or phrases driving a respondent's reaction, rather than just capturing a general opinion
Combines an opinion scale, a matrix of statement-specific agreement items, and a MaxDiff exercise on what factors matter most, giving both breadth and depth on how the statement is being judged
Includes an AI follow-up interview that explores the specific reasoning behind each respondent's reaction, surfacing why certain wording triggered approval, skepticism, or backlash
Captures downstream effects (trust rating, what the politician should do next) alongside political affiliation and age, so credibility shifts can be segmented by respondent background

SurveyMonkey

Which Politician Said... Survey Template

This is a lighter, quiz-style template built around guessing which politician said a given quote, not a structured instrument for measuring reaction, sentiment, or credibility impact. It's a fielding-ready form on a major platform, but its purpose (engagement/trivia) differs from a credibility research survey. Useful mainly as a reference point for how SurveyMonkey packages politician-statement content, not as a direct substitute.

잘하는 점

Ready-to-use template on a widely recognized survey platform
Simple, quick format likely to drive high completion rates
Easy to customize question wording and answer choices via a familiar editor

아쉬운 점

No adaptive AI follow-up questioning to probe the reasoning behind a reaction — it's a static question set
No mechanism to identify which specific words or phrases in a statement drive a respondent's response
No built-in per-response quality scoring or transparent methodology reporting

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template 무료로 시작하기