QuestionPunkQuestionPunk
무료로 시작하기
모든 템플릿

Seminar Feedback and Attendee Profile Survey

Captures how attendees rated the seminar's content, speakers, and logistics, alongside who they are professionally — with an AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind their overall rating so organizers know exactly what to fix or repeat next time.

이 템플릿 사용하기템플릿 더 둘러보기

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 12개 · 약 7분
Q01
메시지

Thanks for attending (Replace with seminar name)! We'd love your honest feedback to help us improve future sessions. Your responses are completely confidential and anonymized. This will take about 4-5 minutes.

Q02
객관식

How did you hear about this seminar?

  • Email invitation
  • Colleague or word of mouth
  • Social media
  • Company website
  • Search engine
  • Other
Q03
의견 척도필수

Overall, how would you rate this seminar?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Poor최대:Excellent
Q04
매트릭스필수

Please rate each aspect of the seminar.

5개 행 × 5개 열
  • Relevance of content to your work
  • Speaker knowledge and delivery
  • Quality of materials/handouts
  • Venue and logistics
  • Opportunities for Q&A or interaction
열: Poor · Below Average · Average · Good · Excellent
Q05
객관식

Which session or topic did you find most valuable? (Template note: replace with your actual session list before launching.)

  • Session A (Replace with topic)
  • Session B (Replace with topic)
  • Session C (Replace with topic)
  • None stood out
Q06
평점 척도필수

How would you rate the seminar's pacing and length?

범위: 1 – 5
최소:Too rushed / too long최대:Just right
Q07
AI 인터뷰

Probe the reasoning behind the respondent's overall seminar rating, anchoring on the specific score they gave. If it was high, find out which single moment or session made it feel worthwhile and whether they'd act on what they learned. If it was middling or low, dig into what specifically fell short (content, speaker, pacing, or logistics) and what one change would have moved their rating up. If they flagged a weak-rated aspect in the matrix above, ask them to describe a concrete example.

Q08
의견 척도필수

How likely are you to attend another seminar from us in the next year?

척도: 0 – 10
최소:Not at all likely최대:Extremely likely
Q09
장문형

What topics or speakers would you like to see at future seminars?

Q10
드롭다운

What is your primary job function?

  • Marketing
  • Sales
  • Product/Engineering
  • Operations
  • HR/People
  • Finance
  • Executive/Leadership
  • Other
  • Prefer not to say
Q11
객관식

How many years of experience do you have in this field?

  • Less than 1 year
  • 1-3 years
  • 4-9 years
  • 10+ years
  • Prefer not to say
Q12
메시지

Thank you for sharing your feedback! Your responses will be compiled into a report the organizing team uses to shape the content, speakers, and format of our next seminar.

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Combines seminar experience ratings (overall, matrix of aspects, pacing/length) with attendee profiling (job function, years of experience) in one flow, so organizers see both what happened and who it happened to.
  • An AI follow-up interview automatically probes the reasoning behind each respondent's overall rating, surfacing the 'why' instead of leaving organizers to guess from a number.
  • Open-ended input on desired future topics/speakers plus a likelihood-to-return question gives forward-looking, actionable data, not just a retrospective scorecard.
  • Auto-generated reports turn the ratings, profile data, and AI-probed reasoning into a ready-to-share summary for stakeholders, without manual compilation.

QuestionPro

Seminar feedback & attendee information survey questions + Sample questionnaire template

This page pairs a sample questionnaire with guidance on seminar feedback and attendee information questions, similar in scope to our combined ratings-plus-profile approach. It reads as a reference template/question bank rather than a single fielding-ready flow with built-in follow-up logic. QuestionPro is a full-featured survey platform, but this specific asset is oriented toward question examples and structure rather than adaptive probing.

잘하는 점

  • Covers both seminar quality and attendee demographic questions in one template concept
  • Backed by a mature enterprise survey platform with broad question-type support
  • Includes sample questionnaire language useful as a starting point

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up that digs into the reasoning behind a rating — respondents just answer fixed questions
  • No mention of automated per-response quality scoring or voice AI interviews
  • Presented as a template/guide reference rather than a ready-to-launch interview-style survey

Jotform

Seminar Feedback Form Template

Jotform offers a drag-and-drop seminar feedback form template, easy to customize with its form builder and widgets. It's a static, fielding-ready form focused on quick feedback collection rather than deep qualitative follow-up. Good for basic satisfaction capture, but it doesn't dynamically explore why an attendee gave a particular rating.

잘하는 점

  • Easy drag-and-drop customization within Jotform's builder
  • Ready-to-use, fielding-ready form for quick deployment
  • Wide integration ecosystem typical of Jotform's platform

아쉬운 점

  • Static question set with no adaptive AI follow-up to probe the reasoning behind ratings
  • No voice AI interview option or automated per-response quality scoring
  • No transparent, published interview prompts since there's no AI interviewing component

SurveySparrow

Online Seminar Feedback Form Template

SurveySparrow's template presents seminar feedback in its signature conversational, one-question-at-a-time format, which improves completion feel versus a traditional form. It's still a pre-set question sequence rather than an AI-driven interview that adapts based on what the respondent actually says. Useful for a friendlier UX, but the depth of follow-up is limited to whatever branching logic is manually configured.

잘하는 점

  • Conversational, chat-like survey experience that can boost engagement
  • Fielding-ready template designed specifically for education/seminar contexts
  • Supports standard logic and branching within its conversational format

아쉬운 점

  • No true adaptive AI follow-up interview that reasons about the respondent's overall rating in real time
  • No voice AI interview mode or automated quality scoring of individual responses
  • Any follow-up logic is pre-scripted rather than generated dynamically from respondent answers

Typeform

Free Seminar Feedback Form Template

Typeform's free template offers its well-known conversational, visually polished form experience for seminar feedback. It's a static template with optional logic jumps, well suited for straightforward satisfaction and ratings capture. It does not include AI-driven interviewing to explore the reasoning behind responses.

잘하는 점

  • Polished, conversational one-question-at-a-time UI
  • Free to use as a starting template
  • Supports basic conditional logic for branching within the form

아쉬운 점

  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to dig into why a respondent rated the seminar the way they did
  • No voice AI interview capability or automated per-response quality scoring
  • No published, transparent AI prompt methodology since there's no AI interviewing component

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.

Use this template무료로 시작하기