모든 템플릿

Live Chat vs. Async Messaging: Support Channel Preference Survey

Measures customer preferences, satisfaction, and response-time expectations across live chat and asynchronous messaging channels to guide support channel investment and design decisions.

샘플 질문

템플릿에 포함된 내용을 미리 확인해 보세요. 모든 질문은 설문 공개 전에 자유롭게 수정할 수 있습니다.

질문 20개 · 약 9분
Q01
메시지

Welcome! This survey explores your experiences and preferences with customer support channels—specifically live chat and asynchronous messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app messages). The survey takes approximately 10 minutes. Your participation is voluntary, and you may stop at any time. There are no right or wrong answers—we are interested in your honest opinions. All responses are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate. By continuing, you agree to participate.

Q02
객관식

Have you contacted customer support for any product or service in the past 12 months?

  • Yes
  • No
Q03
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your overall experience using live chat for customer support?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q04
의견 척도

Overall, which type of support channel do you prefer?

척도: 17
최소:Strongly prefer live chat최대:Strongly prefer async messaging
Q05
드롭다운

For live chat, what is the longest you would wait for a first reply from a human agent?

  • Less than 1 minute
  • 1–2 minutes
  • 3–5 minutes
  • 6–10 minutes
  • 11–15 minutes
  • More than 15 minutes
Q06
AI 인터뷰

Think of a recent customer support interaction. How did the channel you used (e.g., live chat, async messaging, phone) affect the outcome—positively or negatively?

Q07
드롭다운

What is your age group?

  • 18–24
  • 25–34
  • 35–44
  • 45–54
  • 55–64
  • 65+
  • Prefer not to say
Q08
메시지

Thank you for completing this survey. Your responses will help us improve customer support experiences. All answers are confidential and will be reported only in aggregate.

Q09
객관식

In the past 12 months, which of the following customer support channels have you used? Select all that apply.

  • Live chat (real-time typing with an agent)
  • Async messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app messages)
  • Email support
  • Phone call
  • Social media DM
  • Support forum or community
  • In-app chatbot only
  • Other (please specify)
Q10
의견 척도

How satisfied are you with your overall experience using async messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app) for customer support?

척도: 17
최소:Very dissatisfied최대:Very satisfied
Q11
드롭다운

If you could use only one channel for most of your support needs, which would you choose?

  • Live chat
  • Async messaging
  • Email
  • Phone call
  • No strong preference
Q12
드롭다운

For async messaging (e.g., SMS, WhatsApp, in-app), what is the longest you would consider an acceptable wait for a first reply?

  • Less than 30 minutes
  • 30 minutes to 1 hour
  • 1–2 hours
  • 2–4 hours
  • 4–8 hours
  • 8–24 hours
  • More than 24 hours
Q13
장문형

Based on your experiences, what one change would most improve live chat or async messaging support for you?

Q14
객관식

How do you describe your gender?

  • Woman
  • Man
  • Non-binary
  • Prefer not to say
Q15
객관식

When you contact customer support, what is usually your primary goal?

  • Get a quick answer to a simple question
  • Resolve a complex or ongoing issue
  • Get a status update or follow-up
  • Make an account or billing change
  • Report a problem or bug
  • Other (please specify)
Q16
순위 매기기

Please rank the following support attributes from most important (top) to least important (bottom) to you.

  1. Speed of first reply
  2. Getting my issue fully resolved
  3. Being able to multitask during the conversation
  4. Not having to repeat information
  5. 24/7 availability
드래그하여 순위 지정
Q17
드롭다운

Which region best describes where you currently live?

  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Europe
  • North America
  • South America
  • Oceania
  • Middle East
  • Prefer not to say
Q18
객관식

Which device do you most often use when contacting customer support?

  • Smartphone
  • Laptop or desktop
  • Tablet
  • I use multiple devices equally
  • Prefer not to say
Q19
객관식

Imagine you have a quick, simple question for support (e.g., checking a return policy). Which channel would you prefer?

  • Live chat
  • Async messaging
  • Email
  • Phone call
  • No preference
Q20
객관식

Now imagine you have a complex issue that may require multiple back-and-forth exchanges (e.g., a billing dispute). Which channel would you prefer?

  • Live chat
  • Async messaging
  • Email
  • Phone call
  • No preference

포함된 기능

  • AI 후속 질문

    정형화된 설문이 놓치는 세부 내용을, 주관식 답변에 맞춰 AI가 심층 질문으로 끌어냅니다.

  • 주의력 확인 장치

    성의 없는 답변과 저품질 응답자를 걸러내는 내장 안전장치입니다.

  • AI가 작성한 문안

    문구, 질문 순서, 분기 로직까지 AI가 연구 목표에 맞춰 작성합니다.

  • 자동 리포트

    응답이 모이면 주요 주제, 인용문, 이해하기 쉬운 요약이 자동으로 작성됩니다.

다른 서비스와 비교

다른 설문 도구의 가장 유사한 템플릿을 검토했습니다. 그 도구들이 잘하는 점과, 이 템플릿이 한발 더 나아가는 지점을 정리했습니다.

이 템플릿을 선택하는 이유

  • Includes an AI follow-up interview question that adaptively probes on the respondent's most recent support experience, going beyond fixed-choice ratings
  • Directly compares live chat and async messaging using paired opinion-scale satisfaction items and channel-specific wait-time-tolerance dropdowns, rather than treating support as a single undifferentiated category
  • Uses a ranking exercise to surface which support attributes (speed, resolution, tone, etc.) respondents value most, giving weighted insight beyond simple satisfaction scores
  • Combines quantitative filters (channel used, device, goal, demographics) with an open-text improvement question and an AI interview for qualitative depth, then auto-generates a report from both

SurveySparrow

Customer Support Chatbot Template

This template is focused specifically on chatbot interactions rather than a live-chat-vs-async-messaging comparison, so it covers a narrower slice of the channel-preference question. It's a ready-to-field static form built for quick satisfaction capture after a bot interaction. Useful as a single-channel pulse check but not designed to weigh channel tradeoffs.

잘하는 점

  • Purpose-built for chatbot-specific feedback capture
  • Likely quick to deploy for a single support touchpoint
  • Fits SurveySparrow's broader conversational-survey format

아쉬운 점

  • Appears limited to chatbot experiences rather than comparing multiple channels like live chat vs async messaging
  • No adaptive AI follow-up interview to probe why a respondent felt a certain way
  • No published methodology or prompt transparency for how questions were derived

SurveyMonkey

Customer Support Satisfaction Survey Template

A general-purpose customer support satisfaction template that likely covers overall support quality rather than a dedicated live-chat-vs-async-messaging comparison. It's a solid fielding-ready static survey for broad satisfaction tracking. It doesn't appear built to isolate channel-specific expectations like reply-time tolerance per channel.

잘하는 점

  • Well-established, easy-to-deploy static template
  • Broad applicability across support satisfaction use cases
  • Backed by SurveyMonkey's large-scale survey infrastructure

아쉬운 점

  • No indication of channel-by-channel comparison (e.g., wait-time thresholds for live chat vs async)
  • Static question set with no adaptive AI interview or voice interview option
  • No per-response quality scoring or transparent prompt methodology

QuestionPro

Customer Support Service Evaluation Survey Template

This template evaluates customer support service broadly, which overlaps with our topic but doesn't appear focused on comparing live chat and async messaging specifically. It's a standard fielding-ready form suited for general service evaluation. It likely lacks the channel-preference depth (ranking attributes, per-channel wait tolerance) our template targets.

잘하는 점

  • Ready-to-use static template for general support evaluation
  • Fits within QuestionPro's broader enterprise survey suite
  • Likely includes standard satisfaction and NPS-style questions

아쉬운 점

  • No evident channel-specific comparison between live chat and async messaging
  • No adaptive AI follow-up or voice AI interview capability
  • No transparent prompt design or automated quality scoring per response

설문을 공개할 준비가 되셨나요?

이 템플릿을 편집기에서 열어 보세요. 첫 응답자가 보기 전에 모든 부분을 원하는 대로 바꿀 수 있습니다.